Sorry for the necro-post, but I was searching on this same topic today, discovered my old thread, and realized that I'd lost track of it somehow
I wanted to follow-up on some of the responses for my own edification, otherwise I won't have learned much from posing the question in the first place. Thanks in advance for indulging my curiosity. I'm a licensed ham and a EE, but my experience is mostly in signal-processing theory and embedded systems.
So, as a reminder, this started off as nothing more than a thought experiment, although I suppose actually building something is still a possibility. The design exercise was to come up with a ~0.5W VHF CW balloon-borne transmitter, MCU controlled, capable of running a frequency-shift keyed mode like FT8 (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WSJT_(amateur_radio_software)#FT8). It would be a single-use device (cheap), capable of being lofted by a single latex helium balloon (single-digit grams including battery and wire antenna), with the best possible power efficiency and very low sleep current between transmissions. My idea had been to drive the output stage, whatever it is, from the "MCO" (auxillary clock output) pin of an STM32, using the internal PLL to multiply up from a VCXO which would be connected to the MCU DAC for FSK.
Only 0.5W? Why not use the clock generator directly?
Yes, I'd considered hanging a filter off of a digital output. But conceptually (remember I am not an analog-design guy) it seemed to make sense that if my signal source is a square wave, I could use that to drive some kind of resonant switching amplifier, with better efficiency than I'd get by just filtering out the square-wave harmonics and connecting an antenna.
BTW, EPC2038 won't work properly with 3.3V driving. You need at least 4.5V.
Help me understand this. Is it because of part-to-part variation, specifically the spread in Vgs(th)? If I hand-selected for a device with the "typical" (or better) Rds(on) curve, 3.3V-drive would be fine, correct? And roughly 50% of the parts should be typical or better?
30pC*3.3V=100pJ
100pJ*150MHz=0.15W
Doesn't look good for a 0.5W amplifier.
This is off by a factor of 10; the input power is only 15 mW, not 150 mW. Once you account for added capacitance at that node it will obviously be higher, but > 10 dB power gain seems possible unless I am mistaken.
The problem remains how to get sufficient drive current to make this work, without burning additional power which will destroy the overall efficiency. Actually, I was thinking it might be wiser to target the 6m band instead, which could improve the situation.