Well I personally think the new changes sound good and will be for the better but as with many thing what works in practice doesn't always work out in reality. And I'm not talking stupid things like the Ubeam and other such nonsense but some times making new laws doesn't solve any problems but make them worse. It could be like Prohibition in the US in the 1920's alcohol and violence from it costs lives and productivity something had to be done so get rid of it. Yeah that didn't worse it made things worse. Could this new law create more hidden problems then it fixes? Also where did the motivation/will, ormost importantly the money come from to get it changed? Behind every law there is almost always a financial motivation. What is the motivation of this one? Is it that telecoms want more spectrum and they will disguise it as benefiting hams like giving out free digital TV converter boxes which will die in a few months, meanwhile the spectrum is lost from the people forever, and now you have to keep buying new converter boxes? So you sold it for a free box but not really because they turned you into a customer. That's no a good deal at all. Like the town in texas that gave up the rights for the shale gas under the town so every resident could get free directTV for life. In reality they could have gotten free healthcare and retired very comfortably but instead they got TV and new residents don't get free TV. That has to be the dumbest town in America. They more then likely have lead in the water. Millions in free gas for shitty TV service. That's my 0.02$