The more I read about this the more I suspect that RF, like a number of similar areas where regulation is also being deliberately broken have a strong possibility within the next few years gradually together adding up to create major global health problems for the world's people. Problems that are at that point going to be impossible to halt because of stealth entitlements to preempt national rights to regulate which are going to impact countries like our own and others.
Hypothetical future non-biased regulators wont be able to regulate, they won't be able to say no. The question will have been nailed down outside the jurisdiction of nation-states to fix.
The effect of this will be to steal peoples health, for example, people whose apartment blocks have cell-phone base stations mounted on their own or a neighbor's roofs, in an uncompensated manner. They plan to install them every 100 to 200 meters. Thats a lot.
Or, what about people who constantly carry a cell phone in a pocket close to- their gonads.
Look at the areas where they clearly were trying to trivialize the science. Oxidative stress. Reproductive issues including male fertility, etc.
Those areas are problematic and the outdated practice of just measuring heat ignores the other effects which can be quantified, particularly the oxidative stress need to be looked at in a far more granular manner, because vulnerability to oxidative stress is much higher at the beginning of life and later in life than in the middle.
The kinds of experiments they would need to really show subtle effects in, say children, of increased oxidative stress for mothers during pregnancy, can't be done.
However, people have been studying oxidative stress generally for a long time and its a body of science where the effects of oxidative stress generally are quite consistent and very well known. Thats what I have been trying to tell people. They left that out.
The same issue is what worries me about numerous other kinds of exposure, such as low level ionizing radiation. It also causes oxidative stress. So does mercury and heavy metal exposures, so do numerous chemicals.
You should do enough reading to not be subject to "trust us, we're experts" BS.
Certain things are really worrisome. Here is another one, failure to address was pointed out in the critique..
There has been a lot of research which show measurable changes relating to reproduction, such as to the testes, particularly to the quality of human sperm, from strong RF fields, within the range people are commonly exposed to now..
A search for papers pulls up a lot of hits. Just picking a few of the very first ones illustrates what I am trying to explain.
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/omcl/2018/5076271/Another
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6240172/This is not new information. But many people don't seem to be aware of this and the 'official' reports that attempt to sweep it under the rug arent helping us understand it either.
Given these pressures I think the only reasonable path is to go very slowly or stop until much more data has been gathered in these areas where there remain some very important health questions.
Keeping that in mind, if people really want to understand this, put more effort into reading papers - read more original papers to get the finer points of what they say.
Papers you can find in fifteen quality minutes of searching on databases. You miss a lot only reading abstracts. And even more only reading "official experts". Too much!
If I really want to understand something I print it out so I can mark it up with my questions as I read.
I go through a lot of paper doing this. But its what works for me the best.
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
