I have wondered two things about attenuator power ratings. First, is the rating the maximum input power, or maximum dissipated power? For example, if I have a 3 dB attenuator rated at 3 W, am I allowed to insert 6 W of power (since the 3 dB attenuator will absorb half of the power, and half of 6 W is 3 W) or only 3 W?
It is rated for input power, so if it has rating 3 W, then input power should not exceed 3 W (34.7 dBm for 50 Ω).
But for Chinese attenuators I would suggest to divide it's rating at least by 2 or even by 3.
I have several Chinese burned out attenuators which was burned at power which is a little bellow it's rating. For example 5 W attenuator was burned out from 4 W.
For some unknown reason Chinese attenuators cannot keep even rated power. But I have Chinese 10W dummy load which survive at 20 W power for several seconds a lot of times. I don't know why there is such difference between dummy load and attenuators, but Chinese attenuators are move vulnerable for input power than a dummy load.
Also be careful, attenuators are not always bidirectional, usually it has max power connector and low power connector. Do not mix them up, otherwise the attenuator will burn out. I have such experience, because Chinese seller didn't mark where is max power side (he even don't know that
). For example I burned out 35W attenuator with 5 W power in such way.
I found that max power side usually marked with SU label on Chinese attenuators. Usually this is a male connector.
And something I never understood: Why do all attenuators come rated in W and not dBm? Ofcourse they are equivalent but since any RF engineer I know 'thinks' in dBm, wouldn't it make more sense to have everything in dBm?
Watts is more useful, because it allows to see power more precise and allows to estimate heat dissipation. The difference between 2 W and 100 W is just 17 dB, so it's better to see 100 W. With dB values it will be hard to estimate it's heating.