Author Topic: RF generator sweep settings for filter test  (Read 1426 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cio74Topic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 173
  • Country: gb
RF generator sweep settings for filter test
« on: July 03, 2016, 04:42:46 pm »
Hello,

Until I'll buy a proper SA I am playing with a combo made of an Anritsu MG3633A and a Picoscope 3206MSO.

I have made a simple crystal ladder filter with 3 poles, all xtal are 11.0592MHz and then set the generator to output a 0dBm signal

start at 11.00 MHz
stop at 11.10 MHz


The first graph has step size 10Hz and dwell time 10ms

The second step size 1Hz and dwell time 1ms

Apart from the later taking way longer to complete and a much cleaner plot the measured shape and the amplitude at top are very close.

Is there any rule to set dwell time, step size, span for better results?

Thanks.




 

Offline cio74Topic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 173
  • Country: gb
Re: RF generator sweep settings for filter test
« Reply #1 on: July 03, 2016, 05:18:06 pm »
Added 3 more crystals, 6 poles now, not exactly flat response

 

Offline Neganur

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1138
  • Country: fi
Re: RF generator sweep settings for filter test
« Reply #2 on: July 03, 2016, 07:42:33 pm »
Post a schematic with your tuning and coupling capacitor values, that graph looks like you're not tuned.

EDIT: and also, have you measured the xtal frequencies or are you just trusting the values printed onto their enclosure?
« Last Edit: July 04, 2016, 08:47:16 am by Neganur »
 

Offline uncle_bob

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2441
  • Country: us
Re: RF generator sweep settings for filter test
« Reply #3 on: July 03, 2016, 11:07:42 pm »
Hello,

Until I'll buy a proper SA I am playing with a combo made of an Anritsu MG3633A and a Picoscope 3206MSO.

I have made a simple crystal ladder filter with 3 poles, all xtal are 11.0592MHz and then set the generator to output a 0dBm signal

start at 11.00 MHz
stop at 11.10 MHz


The first graph has step size 10Hz and dwell time 10ms

The second step size 1Hz and dwell time 1ms

Apart from the later taking way longer to complete and a much cleaner plot the measured shape and the amplitude at top are very close.

Is there any rule to set dwell time, step size, span for better results?

Thanks.

Hi

If you are going for a filter that is 1 KHz wide, a good guess is that 10 ms of dwell per point will work. The approach is to try 100 ms and then back off to 10. If the response does not change, you are ok. If it does then you need to slow down a bit. Bandwidth is not what really determines the number, so it's just a starting point.

Bob
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf