Is there any reason "RF" has to be involved, besides your conclusion that that's the way you see as being the best way?
You should give us a bit more data, like how much detail is needed for your application, do you simply need to know if he fluid level is above or below some arbitrary value, and so on.
There are likely to be other approaches that work better than RF detection.
What kind of fluid is it? Does it conduct electricity? How massive is it, how viscous?
Watch out that you don't make something that's more complicated than necessary, when something that's simple would suffice.
Ultimately, that's the determination you should make, the most likely to be trouble-free solution.
Not the one that you think looks impressive and "high tech" on the CV but which is ultimately impractical.