Author Topic: ultra narrow band antennas?  (Read 1258 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CopperConeTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1415
  • Country: us
  • *knock knock*
ultra narrow band antennas?
« on: July 10, 2018, 01:23:28 am »
What is the most narrow band antenna that can be made? Is it a thin dipole? Are there any tricks?
 

Online T3sl4co1l

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21672
  • Country: us
  • Expert, Analog Electronics, PCB Layout, EMC
    • Seven Transistor Labs
Re: ultra narrow band antennas?
« Reply #1 on: July 10, 2018, 02:50:55 am »
Superconducting resonators have Q up in the 10^7 range, open a pinhole on that and you'll have an antenna with mediocre efficiency and a more than uselessly narrow bandwidth.

Presumably such a structure could be miniaturized, as a small helical resonator open to space (a Tesla coil as it were), rather than a nearly-closed Helmholtz resonator; at significant cooling cost, of course, given present technology.

Tim
Seven Transistor Labs, LLC
Electronic design, from concept to prototype.
Bringing a project to life?  Send me a message!
 

Offline hagster

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 394
Re: ultra narrow band antennas?
« Reply #2 on: July 10, 2018, 07:46:18 am »
The trouble with very narrow band antennas is that they are very easily detuned. This could be because of nearby materials(or people) or even temperature/humidity changes.

Typically electrically small antennas are narrow band. Much of this is due to the matching network needed to maximise efficiency.

An easy to envisage example is the small tuned loop. You can add more turns to the loop to increase the radiation resistance, but also increases the inductance and the required shunt capacitor size needed to match. The LC circuit becomes more and more narrow band and susceptible to slight changes in L or C.
 

Offline HB9EVI

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 722
  • Country: ch
Re: ultra narrow band antennas?
« Reply #3 on: July 12, 2018, 11:25:31 am »
For the practical, everydays use us radioamateurs normally use short loop-antennas with a variable capacitor as tuning element. In case of an environment with a lot of QRM, such a loop can give a better S/N-ratio than a dipole
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf