Author Topic: Any hands-on experience GW Instek MFG-2000 waveform generators?  (Read 2656 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online nctnicoTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26757
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
I'm in the market for a new (lab grade) function generator. The GW Instek MFG-2000 series looks nice on paper (isolated outputs and an extra pulse generator for starters) and I'm wondering if anyone has some hands-on experience with these generators. Or to put it differently: is it worth the trouble getting one on loan for a test drive?
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 

Offline tautech

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28142
  • Country: nz
  • Taupaki Technologies Ltd. Siglent Distributor NZ.
    • Taupaki Technologies Ltd.
Re: Any hands-on experience GW Instek MFG-2000 waveform generators?
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2018, 02:02:26 am »
The physical layout of where the output enable buttons would seem as a non-starter for some when using a BNC tee directly on the output. Seems GW didn't think that out properly ?  :-//

https://www.gwinstek.com/en-global/products/Signal_Sources/Arbitrary_Function_Generators/MFG-2000

Maybe an SDG5000 that also offers isolated outputs could be a better choice ?
Certainly rise time is better spec'ed.
Avid Rabid Hobbyist
Siglent Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@SiglentVideo/videos
 

Online nctnicoTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26757
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: Any hands-on experience GW Instek MFG-2000 waveform generators?
« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2018, 06:28:06 pm »
I agree the output enable buttons on the GW Instek aren't located in the best spot but the front is crammed anyway because the MFG-2000 can have up to 4 outputs on the front. It doesn't bother me though because I don't use the output enable buttons that much. They often lead to uncontrolled output waveforms anyway. If I need a bit of signal every now and then I use the burst function (triggered manually, externally or by software).

Other (more expensive) two channel generators on my list are:

GW Instek AFG-3022
Keysight 33510 and 33512
Tektronix AFG-3022

Each have pros and cons. The firmware upgrade history on the Siglent generators doesn't give me a warm and fuzzy feeling and this time I want to buy something which doesn't throw me a nasty surprise when it is least convenient. The low jitter spec on the SDG2000 looks nice though. OTOH having isolated channels can be an advantage as well if they don't inject too much common mode noise into the circuit under test.
« Last Edit: June 07, 2018, 06:34:37 pm by nctnico »
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 

Offline precaud

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 734
  • Country: us
    • LinearZ
Re: Any hands-on experience GW Instek MFG-2000 waveform generators?
« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2018, 02:22:09 pm »
Boy, if only the amplifier option had freq response up to a few MHz (even at a bit lower power), an MFG would be almost irresistable...
 

Offline tautech

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28142
  • Country: nz
  • Taupaki Technologies Ltd. Siglent Distributor NZ.
    • Taupaki Technologies Ltd.
Re: Any hands-on experience GW Instek MFG-2000 waveform generators?
« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2018, 07:51:12 pm »
Boy, if only the amplifier option had freq response up to a few MHz (even at a bit lower power), an MFG would be almost irresistable...
Yeah, if you need it.
Siglent offer this as an option too.
https://www.siglentamerica.com/accessory/spa1010/
Avid Rabid Hobbyist
Siglent Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@SiglentVideo/videos
 

Offline precaud

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 734
  • Country: us
    • LinearZ
Re: Any hands-on experience GW Instek MFG-2000 waveform generators?
« Reply #5 on: June 08, 2018, 08:09:24 pm »
Yeah, but the other is a built-in. For a standalone amp, I'd want more than 1MHz...
 

Offline tautech

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28142
  • Country: nz
  • Taupaki Technologies Ltd. Siglent Distributor NZ.
    • Taupaki Technologies Ltd.
Re: Any hands-on experience GW Instek MFG-2000 waveform generators?
« Reply #6 on: June 08, 2018, 08:20:28 pm »
Yeah, but the other is a built-in. For a standalone amp, I'd want more than 1MHz...
I'm curious, for what if I may ask ?
Avid Rabid Hobbyist
Siglent Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@SiglentVideo/videos
 

Offline precaud

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 734
  • Country: us
    • LinearZ
Re: Any hands-on experience GW Instek MFG-2000 waveform generators?
« Reply #7 on: June 08, 2018, 08:25:26 pm »
Driving low-impedance loads.
Driving isolation transformers for PDA measurements.
 
The following users thanked this post: 2N3055

Offline tautech

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28142
  • Country: nz
  • Taupaki Technologies Ltd. Siglent Distributor NZ.
    • Taupaki Technologies Ltd.
Re: Any hands-on experience GW Instek MFG-2000 waveform generators?
« Reply #8 on: June 08, 2018, 08:31:08 pm »
Driving low-impedance loads.
Driving isolation transformers for PDA measurements.
At more than 1 MHz ?  :-//
Avid Rabid Hobbyist
Siglent Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@SiglentVideo/videos
 

Online nctnicoTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26757
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: Any hands-on experience GW Instek MFG-2000 waveform generators?
« Reply #9 on: June 08, 2018, 08:35:40 pm »
Yes. Analog has a crazy fast opamp (40MHz IIRC) which can drive a lot of current. One of my ideas is to put a bunch in parallel onto a heatsink and create an amplifier which can drive 10MHz at several amps. Ofcourse series inductance is going to be a massive problem so it is not trivial to design or use but still.
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 
The following users thanked this post: 2N3055, precaud

Offline precaud

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 734
  • Country: us
    • LinearZ
Re: Any hands-on experience GW Instek MFG-2000 waveform generators?
« Reply #10 on: June 17, 2018, 04:02:00 pm »
The GW Instek MFG-2000 series looks nice on paper (isolated outputs and an extra pulse generator for starters)
Is it worth the trouble getting one on loan for a test drive?

I'm curious; did you decide to test-drive one?
 

Online nctnicoTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26757
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: Any hands-on experience GW Instek MFG-2000 waveform generators?
« Reply #11 on: June 17, 2018, 04:13:22 pm »
The GW Instek MFG-2000 series looks nice on paper (isolated outputs and an extra pulse generator for starters)
Is it worth the trouble getting one on loan for a test drive?
I'm curious; did you decide to test-drive one?
Yes and no. I'm too busy at the moment to do some proper testing.
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 

Offline precaud

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 734
  • Country: us
    • LinearZ
Re: Any hands-on experience GW Instek MFG-2000 waveform generators?
« Reply #12 on: June 18, 2018, 12:28:46 am »
Reading through the manual... the arb capability is crippled (DDS with arb alongside) and these units lack flexibility. Arbs only free-run (for either infinite or for N cycles_), and there is no way to trigger single arb bursts, externally or internally. Which means, for instance, you can't use the pulse gen to generate timed arb bursts. And there is no Sync Out signal in arb mode! Burst functions and external triggering only work on the DDS-generated waveforms.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf