Author Topic: Batteries in the GW121  (Read 10785 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline iXodTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 350
  • Country: us
Batteries in the GW121
« on: September 16, 2017, 04:38:15 am »
I know the BT makes a single 9v impractical. But I'd rather have two 9v's than AA/AAA cells. All my meters have 9v's.

But real estate probably makes this impractical...
 

Offline tautech

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28380
  • Country: nz
  • Taupaki Technologies Ltd. Siglent Distributor NZ.
    • Taupaki Technologies Ltd.
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #1 on: September 16, 2017, 04:50:06 am »
IIRC Dave said that a DC-DC convertor would be used to increase test voltages, what's wrong with that ?
Avid Rabid Hobbyist
Siglent Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@SiglentVideo/videos
 

Offline iXodTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 350
  • Country: us
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #2 on: September 16, 2017, 05:08:53 am »
For me it's a matter of stocking different kinds of batteries for all my meters.

Cheers.
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37740
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #3 on: September 16, 2017, 06:10:33 am »
With a 9V battery you don't get much capacity.
For example, the 121GW consumes about 5mA in normal operation, that will only be circa 100-150hrs operation from a 9V battery. Using 4xAA's gets you 500-600hrs.
It has nothing to do with Bluetooth, the 121GW could use a 9V battery with no changes.

Using two 9V batteires in series to avoid the DC-DC convertere for the 15V diode mode will not work because the battery voltage will very quickly drop below 15V during use so it's pointless to try and do that.
With a single 9V you'd still need a DC-DC boost converter anyway, so there is no advantage at all to using 9V, you just lose battery life.

Even the best 9V batteries will be hopeless at 5mA:


Sure, if I wanted a (slightly) smaller size meter then you could argue the trade-off might be worth it, but I value a long battery life meter. And many people have said they hate 9V's in meter and wanted AA's.
« Last Edit: September 16, 2017, 06:15:32 am by EEVblog »
 
The following users thanked this post: Marco1971

Offline iXodTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 350
  • Country: us
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #4 on: September 16, 2017, 06:41:08 am »
Thanks for the detailed, respectful reply. Now I know!

Sign me up for a GW121...

Cheers.
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37740
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #5 on: September 16, 2017, 07:10:34 am »
Just did a video on this:

 
The following users thanked this post: Jon.C, Marco1971

Offline Gonzy78

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 9
  • Country: fr
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #6 on: September 16, 2017, 11:43:46 am »
Hello Dave, nice work by the way again ... ^^

I am wondering, why not use a Lipo (much more compact and or higher capacity) with a boost with dc linear regulator after that ? If needed a very low noise, use capacitor multiplier circuit. Very handy to kill noise. You could fill the battery with a regular phone charger. It's kinda fast ... That could be nice. I don't know if this is more eco friendly to buy lipo once or buy AA and throw them away ...

I am not a big fan of all integrated DMM chipsets, or dual chipsets solutions. Why not use a 24-32bit Delta sigma dac ?

The arm is quite nice. I would be great that the software could be tweakable or opensource for community updates ;). I know this is a hardware product from a manufacturer, but I am ready to pay for "hobbyst" (and good) DMM that I can tweak a bit. Or it would nice if it's sold like the fluke kit too ;)

I am quite intrested by the bluetooth function. If that function works well with a laptop & ready to python scripts that would be great :D ... If the beast don't power off all the time  :palm:

Good luck to you in this Adventure Dave.

I am thinking about a product that could be handy myself. Unfortunatly in my country open a company is quite a challenge ... way too much bloody documents and taxes ...
 

Online Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16670
  • Country: 00
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #7 on: September 16, 2017, 12:03:58 pm »
Hello Dave, nice work by the way again ... ^^

I am wondering, why not use a Lipo (much more compact and or higher capacity) with a boost with dc linear regulator after that ? If needed a very low noise, use capacitor multiplier circuit. Very handy to kill noise. You could fill the battery with a regular phone charger. It's kinda fast ... That could be nice.

Not for something that has to last many years.
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37740
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #8 on: September 16, 2017, 12:10:15 pm »
I am wondering, why not use a Lipo (much more compact and or higher capacity) with a boost with dc linear regulator after that ? If needed a very low noise, use capacitor multiplier circuit. Very handy to kill noise. You could fill the battery with a regular phone charger. It's kinda fast ... That could be nice. I don't know if this is more eco friendly to buy lipo once or buy AA and throw them away ...

You don't put LiPo into a product that already has 600hrs of operation, let alone one that is used fairly infrequently compared to consumer gear, and unlike consumer gear will not be obsolete in 2-5 years time.
Then you have the problem of how do you charge it. It's not as easy as you think, you can't just add a USB connector as it would never pass safety standards.

Quote
I am not a big fan of all integrated DMM chipsets, or dual chipsets solutions. Why not use a 24-32bit Delta sigma dac ?

Multimeter chipsets do the job very nicely. You have a LOT of stuff to add if you don't use a chipset, it's not just an ADC. Take a look at what's inside a chipset and you'll see.

Quote
The arm is quite nice. I would be great that the software could be tweakable or opensource for community updates ;). I know this is a hardware product from a manufacturer, but I am ready to pay for "hobbyst" (and good) DMM that I can tweak a bit. Or it would nice if it's sold like the fluke kit too ;)

You'll be able to hack it if you want, but the source code will not be open source.
 

Offline joeqsmith

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11747
  • Country: us
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #9 on: September 16, 2017, 02:57:19 pm »
Using two 9V batteires in series to avoid the DC-DC convertere for the 15V diode mode will not work because the battery voltage will very quickly drop below 15V during use so it's pointless to try and do that.

It sounds like you have moved away from the 7V and now plan to release it with the 15V diode check.  It's a nice feature IMO.

Offline nidlaX

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 663
  • Country: us
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #10 on: September 17, 2017, 12:26:51 am »
Are you planning to do private sales to forum supporters and Patreon, then run an open Kickstarter?
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37740
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #11 on: September 17, 2017, 03:17:17 am »
Are you planning to do private sales to forum supporters and Patreon, then run an open Kickstarter?

That's the plan, yes.
 
The following users thanked this post: Jon.C

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37740
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #12 on: September 17, 2017, 03:18:23 am »
It sounds like you have moved away from the 7V and now plan to release it with the 15V diode check.  It's a nice feature IMO.

It's always been 15V. That one you see just had a label that said 7V because we were hacking around with it.
 

Offline TD-Linux

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 16
  • Country: us
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #13 on: September 17, 2017, 11:49:52 am »
I was happy to see AA cells because I have tons of LSD rechargeable ones, but 9V is far rarer. With a 1.05V dropout, NiMH should be fine. Of course, at 600 hours, rechargeables are barely necessary... but I use them for everything else.
 

Offline joeqsmith

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11747
  • Country: us
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #14 on: September 17, 2017, 02:41:24 pm »
It sounds like you have moved away from the 7V and now plan to release it with the 15V diode check.  It's a nice feature IMO.

It's always been 15V. That one you see just had a label that said 7V because we were hacking around with it.
:-+  Glad to hear you're keeping it. 

Offline Mr. Scram

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9810
  • Country: 00
  • Display aficionado
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #15 on: September 17, 2017, 03:21:25 pm »
Hello Dave, nice work by the way again ... ^^

I am wondering, why not use a Lipo (much more compact and or higher capacity) with a boost with dc linear regulator after that ? If needed a very low noise, use capacitor multiplier circuit. Very handy to kill noise. You could fill the battery with a regular phone charger. It's kinda fast ... That could be nice. I don't know if this is more eco friendly to buy lipo once or buy AA and throw them away ...
I can pick up gear that's 50 years old and as long as batteries haven't leaked, I can still power them with contemporary batteries. The chances of that working out with a lithium-ion based battery pack are near zero.

Lithium-ion technology is great for packing a lot of energy in a package that you need right now, without costing an arm and a leg. In other areas, the technology is not so great. Self discharge is much higher with lithium-ion. The battery packs age and wear out. Safety isn't quite that great either, with packs occasionally failing spectacularly. So if you want to power a quad copter, lithium-ion is a sweet option. If you want to power a device that sips power, might likely be used for years to come and could go months between uses, the technology is not that great.
 

Online Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16670
  • Country: 00
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #16 on: September 17, 2017, 04:17:09 pm »
Lithium-ion technology is great for packing a lot of energy in a package that you need right now, without costing an arm and a leg. In other areas, the technology is not so great. Self discharge is much higher with lithium-ion. The battery packs age and wear out. Safety isn't quite that great either, with packs occasionally failing spectacularly. So if you want to power a quad copter, lithium-ion is a sweet option. If you want to power a device that sips power, might likely be used for years to come and could go months between uses, the technology is not that great.

How about a super capacitor? They don't wear out and you could connect it to 5V for a couple of seconds then use it for six months.  >:D
 

Offline Mr. Scram

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9810
  • Country: 00
  • Display aficionado
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #17 on: September 17, 2017, 04:26:44 pm »
How about a super capacitor? They don't wear out and you could connect it to 5V for a couple of seconds then use it for six months.  >:D
I've actually been looking at the long term performance of supercapacitors the other day, but I couldn't quite come up with definitive answers. I gather electrolytic types suffer from the same problems their regular brethren do, eventually drying out. I'm not sure about solid state supercapacitors at all.

If you have any interesting information, links or documentation, I'd be most interested to hear about it.
« Last Edit: September 17, 2017, 04:29:24 pm by Mr. Scram »
 

Offline f4eru

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1093
  • Country: 00
    • Chargehanger
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #18 on: September 18, 2017, 11:22:19 am »
How long would it last with Batterizer? :))?

How about a super capacitor? They don't wear out and you could connect it to 5V for a couple of seconds then use it for six months.  >:D
The energy in a supercap is aboud 1/10 that of an alkaline cell. So you'll slash your time from 400 to 40 hours....

Offline BBBbbb

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 289
  • Country: nl
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #19 on: September 18, 2017, 12:05:09 pm »
How long would it last with Batterizer? :))?
I actually think Dave is making all this stuff up so he could justify using Batterizer compatible batteries. He just loves that miracle product.  :D
 

Online Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16670
  • Country: 00
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #20 on: September 18, 2017, 12:17:11 pm »
How about a super capacitor? They don't wear out and you could connect it to 5V for a couple of seconds then use it for six months.  >:D
The energy in a supercap is aboud 1/10 that of an alkaline cell. So you'll slash your time from 400 to 40 hours....

I know, hence the emoticon.

Also: Dave correctly pointed out that any external connector would instantly disqualify any CAT ratings. Recharging is really out of the question.

 

Offline f4eru

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1093
  • Country: 00
    • Chargehanger
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #21 on: September 20, 2017, 11:28:47 am »
Quote
Recharging is really out of the question.
Not if you do it the agilent's way : recharging through the normal banana terminals.
At work we have U1252B models.
They recharge on the measuring port, and they suck.
The battery life is quite low, and they must often be recharged.
They probably do it to have the same moldymeter platform than the shiny OLED ones, where the battery life is low due to the display anyway.

Offline HKJ

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2904
  • Country: dk
    • Tests
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #22 on: September 20, 2017, 01:14:20 pm »
The battery life is quite low, and they must often be recharged.

A primary battery will give about 3 times longer battery life, at least as long as you do not try to charge it.

I do not get the idea with a rechargeable multimeter, when the battery runs out I cannot wait a couple of hours for it to charge.
 

Offline Mr. Scram

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9810
  • Country: 00
  • Display aficionado
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #23 on: September 20, 2017, 03:14:36 pm »
How long would it last with Batterizer? :))?

How about a super capacitor? They don't wear out and you could connect it to 5V for a couple of seconds then use it for six months.  >:D
The energy in a supercap is aboud 1/10 that of an alkaline cell. So you'll slash your time from 400 to 40 hours....
Which isn't as much of a problem if you can charge it within a few seconds, some long data logging scenarios notwithstanding.
 

Offline chefkoch84

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 41
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #24 on: September 20, 2017, 04:10:17 pm »
On the supercap Idea:

I own much less Multimeters than the average user here...

But one thing I own is the Voltcraft VC2000. It is powered by a "goldcap" that can be recharged at 12V or 230V through the testleads.
http://www.radiomuseum.org/r/conrad_green_multimeter_vc200.html

I like the concept but it also gets annoying if you just wanted a quick measurment and the thing is empty again.
Charging is like 3-4 minutes.
This thing dates back to 1995 and I only once changed the cap.

(btw: the another meter is daves eevblog brymon)

Greetings
Max

EDIT: Of course: Please sign me also up for a GW121...
« Last Edit: September 20, 2017, 04:12:37 pm by chefkoch84 »
 

Offline Flappy

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 14
  • Country: au
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #25 on: December 22, 2018, 02:06:57 am »

 

Offline jazper

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 56
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #26 on: December 25, 2018, 04:50:28 am »
Any reason you can think of not to run the 121gw on disposable lithiums? Eg energizer Ultra lithiums?
 

Offline beanflying

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7360
  • Country: au
  • Toys so very many Toys.
Re: Batteries in the GW121
« Reply #27 on: December 25, 2018, 04:58:00 am »
Any reason you can think of not to run the 121gw on disposable lithiums? Eg energizer Ultra lithiums?

Because it would be over voltage for a lot of the cycle. The meter was designed for 4x1.5V maximum not 4x1.6-7. There was some posts in one of the 121GW threads including a post from Dave saying it was a bad idea. https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/eevblog-121gw-multimeter-issues/msg1782236/#msg1782236
« Last Edit: December 25, 2018, 04:59:41 am by beanflying »
Coffee, Food, R/C and electronics nerd in no particular order. Also CNC wannabe, 3D printer and Laser Cutter Junkie and just don't mention my TEA addiction....
 
The following users thanked this post: jazper


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf