EEVblog Electronics Community Forum
Products => Test Equipment => Topic started by: mrnuke on June 04, 2016, 06:03:15 pm
-
I've been playing around with my Rigol 1054Z, and I noticed that the waveform on Ch1 changes depending on whether Ch2 is enabled or not. This doesn't seem right.
Is this a normal phenomenon, or do I have a faulty unit?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGXGfV2qKgk (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGXGfV2qKgk)
-
Probably a PEBKAC. If you look at the top of the screen you'll see the number for sample rate has changed. That might be enough to do it (ie. you've got half the sample rate you had before).
-
That might explain the waveform changing when Ch2 is enabled, but it still doesn't explain why the waveform on Ch1 changes when Ch2 is physically connected and disconnected from the scope.
-
Sorry, I didn't watch the video before.
But: PEBKAC. You're triggering on channel 2. :)
-
Trigger is set to Ch1, 0V, falling edge.
-
There should be ~ no cross talk between channels, but you should test for it explicitly under controlled conditions to be certain your DUT isn't causing it for some unclear reason. Rigol claims at >= 40dB channel isolation. The best way is two separate signal sources one per channel, not say from one source with a dual output unless you are sure the dual-output source is problem free.
-
Trigger is set to Ch1, 0V, falling edge.
Screenshots and video say different. A cyan trigger line appears on the screen when you enable channel 2 in the video (and there's no trigger line visible when only channel 1 is enabled)
(https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/channel-cross-talk-issue-on-rigol-1054z/?action=dlattach;attach=230283;image)
If you're triggering on channel 2 then it's not surprising the waveform changes when you connect/disconnect a probe on that channel.
-
By using a long wire to probe the signal you add inductance. And when you enable channel 2 you add extra capacitance with the ground of the probe. Probably these two resonate and that's why you see the signal change. I'm pretty sure this is normal. You shouldn't probe the signal the way you probe it. The scope probe is a transmission line and it properly cancels inductance/capacitance normally. By using a long wire it's no longer cancelled.
-
Certainly you wouldn't see this effect if channel isolation had been infinitely large. But it's not.
-
Hmm. You're probably right. I still wouldn't probe any signal the way he does and expect to get proper results.
Trigger is set to Ch1, 0V, falling edge.
Screenshots and video say different. A cyan trigger line appears on the screen when you enable channel 2 in the video (and there's no trigger line visible when only channel 1 is enabled)
(https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/channel-cross-talk-issue-on-rigol-1054z/?action=dlattach;attach=230283;image)
If you're triggering on channel 2 then it's not surprising the waveform changes when you connect/disconnect a probe on that channel.
-
Screenshots and video say different. A cyan trigger line appears on the screen when you enable channel 2 in the video (and there's no trigger line visible when only channel 1 is enabled)
(https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/channel-cross-talk-issue-on-rigol-1054z/?action=dlattach;attach=230283;image)
The trigger indicator on the left side of the screen. The cyan line you refer to is the Ch2 signal, which is, 0V + noise, since there's nothing hooked up to Ch2. If we were truly triggering off channel 2, then the ch1 waveform would be a line of yellow.
-
Case in point.
Also, on the original captures, trigger settings are displayed in upper-right corner of screen.
-
The trigger indicator on the left side of the screen. The cyan line you refer to is the Ch2 signal, which is, 0V + noise, since there's nothing hooked up to Ch2. If we were truly triggering off channel 2, then the ch1 waveform would be a line of yellow.
Oh, you're right. PEBCAK at this end. :palm:
Still, it looks like a triggering problem.
Try moving the trigger level up/down a bit. If it goes away then 'crosstalk' isn't the problem, it's the probing setup (as others have said).
-
Could you probe the signal without the long wire and see if anything changes?
-
This is normal, if we look CH1 alone signal is "clear" thin trace and after CH2 is there CH1 signal come "fat".
Ch1 alone samplerate is 1GSa/s and CH1+2 samplerate is 500MSa/s
This is one form of aliasing. Its name is "corner wobbling"
But there in image can see also other effect (so careful to inspect so that do not mix different things) what come from trace fine positioning and then also some false triggers due to signal shape and not optimal trigger setting. But it is other case.
Whole talk about "cross talk" in this case is wrong. In your image CH2 do not show anything, least with my poor eyes. My eyes "best before" day have gone long time ago)
Cross talk mean that other channel signal is leaking to other channel. If you set high level fast signal to CH1 and then not connect anything to CH2 you can see CH1 signal also in CH2 when you select enough sensitive setting. Try 5Vpp 100MHz to Ch1 (1V/div) and nothing to CH2. Then select 10mV/div for CH2. Now you may see signal also there and this is cross talk. Typically attenuation is less with higher frequencies. 40dB cross talk attenuation (voltage) means 1:100.
About different kind of displayed aliasing...
Principle is also explained here (I can not find now this much clear and better example)
http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5989-5732EN.pdf (http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5989-5732EN.pdf)
In this paper look Figure 4. (note that display mode there is dots)
Figure 4 shows an example of a
500-MHz bandwidth scope sampling
at just 1 GSa/s while operating
in a three- or four-channel mode.
Although the fundamental frequency
(clock rate) of the input signal is well
within Nyquist’s criteria, the signal’s
edges contain significant frequency
components well beyond the Nyquist
frequency (fN). When you view them
repetitively, the edges of this signal
appear to “wobble” with varying
degrees of pre-shoot, over-shoot, and
various edge speeds. This is evidence
of aliasing, and it clearly demonstrates
that a sample rate-to-bandwidth ratio
of just 2:1 is insufficient for reliable
digital signal measurements.
-
Well, I reproduced the same setup with a 25Mhz square wave. I can see the waveform shape change on channel 1 by connecting/disconnecting the probe on channel 2. What is somewhat surprising is that I can't see any difference just by turning channel 2 on/off (with the probe connected).
-
Well, I probed the thing the hard way. I can still see the Ch1 waveform change as I enable or disable Ch2, but I can't see any change when I connect or disconnect Ch2. As rf-loop noted, this is most likely due to aliasing. There "appears" to be some 200MHz ringing there, and we're only probing it at 500MS/s.
I'm still not seeing how the previous probing method could affect Ch1 when Ch2 is connected. Could that be due to the return current traveling down the ground of the second probe and reflecting odd the end?
-
Also I couldn't see the effect in DC coupling mode. So the AC coupling capacitor might something to do with it.
-
Anyway, I think this would be an excellent topic for a future video for Dave.
I believe you can find this effect on other scopes too, not just on the Rigol 1054Z.
-
Look at the number of sample points. Using Ch1 it's 120pts. Using Ch1 and Ch2 it's 60pts. That's very few points spread across the entire width of the screen.
The sinx/x interpolation is having a difficult time with so few points. You could try turning it off, or going to dots mode.
Because the interpolation is off, and (I think) this scope has a digital trigger, it would be throwing the trigger off too, hence the horizontal smudging around Ch1 trigger point.
-
Anyway, I think this would be an excellent topic for a future video for Dave.
I couldn't agree more!!!
-
You add a parallel capacitance to the ground by connecting the probe on channel 2. I think this in itself can explain the effect.
I'm still not seeing how the previous probing method could affect Ch1 when Ch2 is connected. Could that be due to the return current traveling down the ground of the second probe and reflecting odd the end?
-
I'm still not seeing how the previous probing method could affect Ch1 when Ch2 is connected. Could that be due to the return current traveling down the ground of the second probe and reflecting odd the end?
You add a parallel capacitance to the ground by connecting the probe on channel 2. I think this in itself can explain the effect.
That would (maybe) explain why connecting/disconnecting the probe makes a difference but it wouldn't explain why simply turning channel 2 on/off makes such a big difference.
-
Screenshots and video say different. A cyan trigger line appears on the screen when you enable channel 2 in the video (and there's no trigger line visible when only channel 1 is enabled)
(https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/channel-cross-talk-issue-on-rigol-1054z/?action=dlattach;attach=230283;image)
The trigger indicator on the left side of the screen. The cyan line you refer to is the Ch2 signal, which is, 0V + noise, since there's nothing hooked up to Ch2. If we were truly triggering off channel 2, then the ch1 waveform would be a line of yellow.
The trigger level indicator is on the _right_ side of the waveform display area, but the actual trigger channel, type, and voltage level are always indicated at the very top right of the screen, and even though you can't always see the level in the video, you can at least always tell that this indicator remains yellow, thus indicating that CH1 is the trigger channel used in the video. The indicator at top right does not show the _trigger_ coupling setting, and there is no trigger level indicator or trigger level line displayed if the trigger coupling is set to AC or Low-Frequency Reject, but the trigger level is still displayed in the trigger indicator box at the very top right of the screen.
-
I'm still not seeing how the previous probing method could affect Ch1 when Ch2 is connected. Could that be due to the return current traveling down the ground of the second probe and reflecting odd the end?
You add a parallel capacitance to the ground by connecting the probe on channel 2. I think this in itself can explain the effect.
That would (maybe) explain why connecting/disconnecting the probe makes a difference but it wouldn't explain why simply turning channel 2 on/off makes such a big difference.
Yes. I was referring to connecting/disconnecting the probe.
I can't reproduce the effect when he turns ch2 on/off. I'm not sure what's behind that.
-
I'm still not seeing how the previous probing method could affect Ch1 when Ch2 is connected. Could that be due to the return current traveling down the ground of the second probe and reflecting odd the end?
You add a parallel capacitance to the ground by connecting the probe on channel 2. I think this in itself can explain the effect.
That would (maybe) explain why connecting/disconnecting the probe makes a difference but it wouldn't explain why simply turning channel 2 on/off makes such a big difference.
Yes. I was referring to connecting/disconnecting the probe.
I can't reproduce the effect when he turns ch2 on/off. I'm not sure what's behind that.
I can now reproduce turning ch2 on/off effect too. I think turning ch2 on/off changes the waveform slightly (due to the added parasitics) and this causes a triggering issue. If I move the trigger level then this doesn't happen.
-
I'm still not seeing how the previous probing method could affect Ch1 when Ch2 is connected. Could that be due to the return current traveling down the ground of the second probe and reflecting odd the end?
You add a parallel capacitance to the ground by connecting the probe on channel 2. I think this in itself can explain the effect.
That would (maybe) explain why connecting/disconnecting the probe makes a difference but it wouldn't explain why simply turning channel 2 on/off makes such a big difference.
Yes. I was referring to connecting/disconnecting the probe.
I can't reproduce the effect when he turns ch2 on/off. I'm not sure what's behind that.
I can now reproduce turning ch2 on/off effect too. I think turning ch2 on/off changes the waveform slightly (due to the added parasitics) and this causes a triggering issue. If I move the trigger level then this doesn't happen.
This is unlikely to be caused by aliasing. I used 400 kHz square wave to test this. By changing the timebase from 500ns to 1us the sampling rate also changed from 1GS/s to 500MS/s. Yet this didn't fix the triggering issue. However by turning ch2 on the signal triggers stable. So I'm pretty sure it's caused by parasitics.
-
This is unlikely to be caused by aliasing. I used 400 kHz square wave to test this. By changing the timebase from 500ns to 1us the sampling rate also changed from 1GS/s to 500MS/s. Yet this didn't fix the triggering issue. However by turning ch2 on the signal triggers stable. So I'm pretty sure it's caused by parasitics.
First you tell that you think there is not aliasing, After then you "proof" it telling you use 400kHz square wave and changing scope samplerate from 1G to 500M. I'm very interested to listen more... about this study. Sorry but why set this strong comment where you try explain there is not aliasing and then you nearly tell use that you need first study basic fundametals about signals and also about sampling and aliasing. Your square wave 1st harmonic frequency do not tell nearly anything here. I can push 500MSa/s aliasing using 1Hz square wave. Do you know how? Do we really start from basic school level fundamentals. After you are familiar with basic fundamentals of digital scopes and sampling and aliasing: Look these OP images and think! After you are readu coma agen and tell us you do not see there aliasing. I see there aliasing when I look 0,5s this 500MSa/s image and signal shape. (I see there also some other natural "effects".
About 2 channel image on and trigger.
This can not proof if there is not time jitter in signal or trigger jumps (I suspect last one because... look trigger position and signal shape it match well to time shift with these some acquisitions including knowledge that Rigol trigger performance is <censored>.
Of course IF signal have some high frequency parasitics example far over Oscilloscope nominal BW but nerly Nyquist freq or higher they can produce or sure produce also visible aliasing but still nearly impossible to see aliasing signal itself and aliasing may be sign what tell to user that there is "something" what need inspect more deep. And this need knowledge and experience so that understand what possible things can detect from scope screen.
In OP's images there can see absolutely sure aliasing. If not, then I'm santaclaus.. What cause aliasing is other question. But there is also things so that all differencies between images are not at all only aliasing based.
-
First you tell that you think there is not aliasing, After then you "proof" it telling you use 400kHz square wave and changing scope samplerate from 1G to 500M. I'm very interested to listen more... about this study. Sorry but why set this strong comment where you try explain there is not aliasing and then you nearly tell use that you need first study basic fundametals about signals and also about sampling and aliasing. Your square wave 1st harmonic frequency do not tell nearly anything here. I can push 500MSa/s aliasing using 1Hz square wave. Do you know how? Do we really start from basic school level fundamentals. After you are familiar with basic fundamentals of digital scopes and sampling and aliasing: Look these OP images and think! After you are readu coma agen and tell us you do not see there aliasing. I see there aliasing when I look 0,5s this 500MSa/s image and signal shape. (I see there also some other natural "effects".
Calm down a bit. I gather english is not your first language but you are coming across a little agressive.
-
First you tell that you think there is not aliasing, After then you "proof" it telling you use 400kHz square wave and changing scope samplerate from 1G to 500M. I'm very interested to listen more... about this study. Sorry but why set this strong comment where you try explain there is not aliasing and then you nearly tell use that you need first study basic fundametals about signals and also about sampling and aliasing. Your square wave 1st harmonic frequency do not tell nearly anything here. I can push 500MSa/s aliasing using 1Hz square wave. Do you know how?
I'm not sure what's your problem but by attacking me personally instead of what I'm saying surely isn't helpful and not a very constructive approach.
About aliasing: Normally I don't suspect aliasing if my signal's frequency content is much lower than the sampling rate. Even if I consider the 5th harmonic of a 400 Khz square wave that's still only 2 Mhz which is much lower than 500MS/s sampling rate. I set the memory depth to 12K that's why the sampling rate changes at 1us. I wrote the message very late in the night (and it's much too early for me now) so I might missed something. Still, I didn't expect to be lectured in such a harsh way.
Also if you're so knowledgeable than instead of criticizing me personally you should explain how a 1 Hz square wave sampled at 500MS/s can cause aliasing. I admit that I haven't heard about such thing. I suspect that I'm not the only one though. Even the Keysight document's figure 4 you linked only mentions aliasing happens when the 2nd, 3rd, etc. harmonics are over the Nyquist frequency. That is not the case here.
-
First you tell that you think there is not aliasing, After then you "proof" it telling you use 400kHz square wave and changing scope samplerate from 1G to 500M. I'm very interested to listen more... about this study. Sorry but why set this strong comment where you try explain there is not aliasing and then you nearly tell use that you need first study basic fundametals about signals and also about sampling and aliasing. Your square wave 1st harmonic frequency do not tell nearly anything here. I can push 500MSa/s aliasing using 1Hz square wave. Do you know how?
I'm not sure what's your problem but by attacking me personally instead of what I'm saying surely isn't helpful and not a very constructive approach.
About aliasing: Normally I don't suspect aliasing if my signal's frequency content is much lower than the sampling rate. Even if I consider the 5th harmonic of a 400 Khz square wave that's still only 2 Mhz which is much lower than 500MS/s sampling rate. I set the memory depth to 12K that's why the sampling rate changes at 1us. I wrote the message very late in the night (and it's much too early for me now) so I might missed something. Still, I didn't expect to be lectured in such a harsh way.
Also if you're so knowledgeable than instead of criticizing me personally you should explain how a 1 Hz square wave sampled at 500MS/s can cause aliasing. I admit that I haven't heard about such thing. I suspect that I'm not the only one though. Even the Keysight document's figure 4 you linked only mentions aliasing happens when the 2nd, 3rd, etc. harmonics are over the Nyquist frequency. That is not the case here.
I do not try attack person at all but if I see there is reason to suspect you do not understand theory I say it. I do not understand at all why you take 400kHz and then talk some few harmonics about it when OP signal is really totally different where exist far far over 100MHz components what leads to aliasing when samplerate drops from 1G to 500M.
If still something unclear I can demonstrate it with other scopes and known signal.
Did you not note at all original message images? OP image tell where he is.
And, there is aliasing due to low samplerate related to signal frequency components.
If need I can demonstrate this aliasing with many different scopes. Math is math and when we have right theory it match also with practice. If practice do not match theory, then we have wrong theory.
I try agen with OP image where 2 channels in in use. Look carefully signal changes related to time and used sampling interval (marked also in image)
There may be what ever reason in signal, parasitic oscillations and what ever but it do not violate any kind of fact when I say that there is digital oscilloscope aliasing visible and really clearly and without any doupt. Please look image and calculate / estimate your self.
(https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/channel-cross-talk-issue-on-rigol-1054z/?action=dlattach;attach=230404;image)
-
I can push 500MSa/s aliasing using 1Hz square wave. Do you know how? Do we really start from basic school level fundamentals. After you are familiar with basic fundamentals of digital scopes and sampling and aliasing: Look these OP images and think! After you are readu coma agen and tell us you do not see there aliasing.
I do not try attack person at all but if I see there is reason to suspect you do not understand theory I say it.
I wonder what happens if do want to attack my person.
I do not understand at all why you take 400kHz and then talk some few harmonics about it
Because as I mentioned I reproduced the same issue using a signal generator.
If need I can demonstrate this aliasing with many different scopes. Math is math and when we have right theory it match also with practice. If practice do not match theory, then we have wrong theory.
You've just claimed that I don't understand theory. And now you say that theory is wrong? Maybe this theory only exists in your own little mind?
There may be what ever reason in signal, parasitic oscillations and what ever but it do not violate any kind of fact when I say that there is digital oscilloscope aliasing visible and really clearly and without any doupt.
I wrote "This is unlikely to be caused by aliasing" referring to waveform changing on the scope by turning ch2 on/off.
I never claimed that there's no aliasing (corner wobbling) visible on the OP's scope.
I can push 500MSa/s aliasing using 1Hz square wave. Do you know how?
You still haven't explained how this is possible. Since you claim that I don't understand sampling theory please do explain. If you can't then I'll need to conclude that it is you who don't understand sampling theory.
-
Please can we stop this before I lock the topic.
-
Here is other example about aliasing.
Here ~400kHz freq.
In all images signal parameters same.
I forget one image. If I adjust signal risetime (harmonics) less fast of course aliasing disappear, of course.
Here signal itself measured risetime is somewhere around near 1ns but here transmission and scope input destroy it and also produce some ringing due to impedance mismatch. (Scope input 50ohm resistance is not same as impedance) (HP specification for risetime is = or < 1.4ns (in this gen, rise and fall time is also adjustable))
500MSa/s image there is aliasing and it is (in this case "corners wobbling") visible very clearly (compare this with Rigol display there is somehow similar visible but of course different due to different signal and due to poor scope front end and fake Sinc function and also digfferent more poor interpolation between sample points for positioning AND we do not know what all this unknown signal include what we can not see directly in OP Rigol scope image)
And if you think this theory is only in my mind. Please read this previously linked HP/agilent/Keyshit paper and find it there.
1GSa/s nearly no aliasing visible
2GSa/s no aliasing visible.
-
This is unlikely to be caused by aliasing. I used 400 kHz square wave to test this. By changing the timebase from 500ns to 1us the sampling rate also changed from 1GS/s to 500MS/s.
What is the rise time of your 400 kHz square wave. In this case we are looking at aliasing around the trigger point of our signal. If your 400kHz signal had a very good rise time its bandwidth would be much higher than you expect. For example a 1 nS risetime would have a bandwidth of 350 MHz using the formula Rise time = 0.35 / Bandwidth (assuming Gaussian response), in this case a 500 MS/s would result in aliasing of the rising edge.
The 400 kHz square wave would not suffer from aliasing as it is well bellow Nyquist sample rate but the rising edge being aliased by the trigger circuit may be a different story.
-
This is unlikely to be caused by aliasing. I used 400 kHz square wave to test this. By changing the timebase from 500ns to 1us the sampling rate also changed from 1GS/s to 500MS/s.
What is the rise time of your 400 kHz square wave. In this case we are looking at aliasing around the trigger point of our signal. If your 400kHz signal had a very good rise time its bandwidth would be much higher than you expect. For example a 1 nS risetime would have a bandwidth of 350 MHz using the formula Rise time = 0.35 / Bandwidth (assuming Gaussian response), in this case a 500 MS/s would result in aliasing of the rising edge.
The 400 kHz square wave would not suffer from aliasing as it is well bellow Nyquist sample rate but the rising edge being aliased by the trigger circuit may be a different story.
I expected that explanation from rf-loop. You're right of course. I generate the signal using a Siglent SGD1025. I've measured the rise time using a 500Mhz real time scope. It's about 7.5ns. (The coax -3db point is about 1.5Ghz). So assuming Gaussian response that's about 46.6 Mhz.
-
Now also this need keep in mind. (bit sidestep but it is also so near in this particular case what OP show)
In many scopes Sinc can not turn off at all or just in very limuted cases. (what heck these scope designers have thinked). Including this Rigol model with these settings, Sinc forced on.. (more far sidejump: Also it need know that different scopes Sinc fidelity is different)
Because OP's Rigol use Sin(x)/x imitation I use also Sin(x)/x ON in this example image with semi fast edge pulses.
(also OP image have quite fast details related to sample rate)
With Sinc need be some times careful and also keep it in mind specially if can not turn it off and look what is visible with lines (Sinc OFF)
Here what old Tek basics tell (about Sinc with "undersampling"):
-
Here is other example about aliasing.
Here ~400kHz freq.
In all images signal parameters same.
I forget one image. If I adjust signal risetime (harmonics) less fast of course aliasing disappear, of course.
Here signal itself measured risetime is somewhere around near 1ns but here transmission and scope input destroy it and also produce some ringing due to impedance mismatch. (Scope input 50ohm resistance is not same as impedance) (HP specification for risetime is = or < 1.4ns (in this gen, rise and fall time is also adjustable))
500MSa/s image there is aliasing and it is (in this case "corners wobbling") visible very clearly (compare this with Rigol display there is somehow similar visible but of course different due to different signal and due to poor scope front end and fake Sinc function and also digfferent more poor interpolation between sample points for positioning AND we do not know what all this unknown signal include what we can not see directly in OP Rigol scope image)
And if you think this theory is only in my mind. Please read this previously linked HP/agilent/Keyshit paper and find it there.
1GSa/s nearly no aliasing visible
2GSa/s no aliasing visible.
Fine and dandy. But as I said previously I never questioned the existence of corner wobbling.
What I'm saying is that in OP's case the effect is caused by ground parasitics and (very probably) trigger instability. I can set the trigger level in such way that connecting the probe on ch2 causes trigger instability. Also turning ch2 on/off can cause trigger instability. If I move the trigger level around than the scope triggers properly with no corner wobbling visible. Also changing the timebase from 500ns to 1us (with memory set to 12K) doesn't impact the waveform shape or triggering.
Why don't you just reproduce the setup and report back what you see? It's not that difficult and would be far more productive.
-
Why don't you just reproduce the setup and report back what you see? It's not that difficult and would be far more productive.
Because I do not have OP's signal available and also today I have not anymore Rigol 1000Z (what I know also well because I have owned one and used it)
But, what I see OP image and as far as I know, where ever he set trigger level there is aliasing due to low samplerate related to signal details. This is my opinion and based also to knowledge and lot of lab experience. I stay behind my words. If I get original OP's signal and this oscilloscope I proof it. Without it, I keep my opinion based to theory and mu experience.
Of course there can exist also other reasons and so on as you explain and I can well accept also these may happend and even exist in this case also. This do not disable clear aliasing what there is sure with 500MSa.
Trigger instability is other case. (I mean these visible acquisitions what are horizontally different location (randomly trigged) This may be in singnal under test but because in image it can clearly see what is in signal just around trigger level my suspect is that this disappear with small change in trig level.
But then other case.
Topic name is: Channel cross-talk issue on Rigol 1054Z ?
(Rigol can here forget because it exist in all scope what I know, more or less.)
Attached: This is oscilloscope channels cross talk.
(look V/div scales ratio (1:500) and estimate cross talk ratio)
CH3 Signal is 5V ~5ns pulses. CH4 open with BNC cap for reduce external EMI.
-
Okay, I reproduced the setup and made some pictures. Hopefully this will help.
Here's the setup:
(http://i.imgur.com/DhVMSOz.jpg)
25 Mhz, 3Vpp, square wave (load set: 50 ohm). Rise time about 7ns - 7.5ns (as measured previously).
The probe visible on the picture is connected to Ch1.
Scope setup:
Ch1 and Ch2 AC coupled. Trigger: DC coupled, falling edge.
First I only enable Ch1:
(http://i.imgur.com/Jd1gYXF.jpg)
If I enable Ch2 too then trigger is unstable (trigger level is the same as previously):
(http://i.imgur.com/dpmDydM.jpg)
If I move the trigger level then it triggers stable:
(http://i.imgur.com/2GkKyTP.jpg)
Also triggers stable with only Ch1 enabled:
(http://i.imgur.com/cBZ2JxL.jpg)
-
Okay, I reproduced the setup and made some pictures. Hopefully this will help.
Here's the setup:
(http://i.imgur.com/DhVMSOz.jpg)
25 Mhz, 3Vpp, square wave (load set: 50 ohm). Rise time about 7ns - 7.5ns (as measured previously).
The probe visible on the picture is connected to Ch1.
Scope setup:
Ch1 and Ch2 AC coupled. Trigger: DC coupled, falling edge.
First I only enable Ch1:
(http://i.imgur.com/Jd1gYXF.jpg)
If I enable Ch2 too then trigger is unstable (trigger level is the same as previously):
(http://i.imgur.com/dpmDydM.jpg)
If I move the trigger level then it triggers stable:
(http://i.imgur.com/2GkKyTP.jpg)
Also triggers stable with only Ch1 enabled:
(http://i.imgur.com/cBZ2JxL.jpg)
Signal shape ok and without signs about aliasing. This is also expected with using SDG1025 (we know there is not enough hf components in signal for aliasing with 500MSa/s.)
Trigger: as can expect. Normal. (this same situation exist also in OP image)
(also as can see and estimate your signal do not have so high f components as OP signal but as we know there is also Rigol bit weird "sinc" imitation doing its own effects. (and of course trigger is not derived from this signal image what you see in display)
-
just my 2cnts observing the OP and discussion around here. this is not 1 problem issue. it consists of several problems...
1) poor probing technique, long uncoupled loop (long gnd wire, and long signal wire), a slight change to the setup will change the probe impedance, loading and ringing characteristic of the hi-freq elements of the signal...
2) crosstalk between dso channels. as demonstrated by the OP in 0:53. and discussed before... https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/ds1054z-issue/msg886447/#msg886447 (https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/ds1054z-issue/msg886447/#msg886447) in that thread there is "soft crosstalk" so i guess there must be some hardware crosstalk resulting the effect... this crosstalk will change signal loading esp the hi freq harmonics.
3) dso trigger threshold. ds1000z is known for its weakness in this regards... https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/rigol-ds1054z-unable-to-trigger-cal-signal-at-lt-0-6v/msg855558/#msg855558 (https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/rigol-ds1054z-unable-to-trigger-cal-signal-at-lt-0-6v/msg855558/#msg855558)
4) and last but not least, the so much disputed "sample aliasing" resulting in different sinc output seen on the screen...
all of these and probably more, contribute to the effect... my 2cnts...
-
just my 2cnts observing the OP and discussion around here. this is not 1 problem issue. it consists of several problems...
1) poor probing technique, long uncoupled loop (long gnd wire, and long signal wire), a slight change to the setup will change the probe impedance, loading and ringing characteristic of the hi-freq elements of the signal...
2) crosstalk between dso channels. as demonstrated by the OP in 0:53. and discussed before... https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/ds1054z-issue/msg886447/#msg886447 (https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/ds1054z-issue/msg886447/#msg886447) in that thread there is "soft crosstalk" so i guess there must be some hardware crosstalk resulting the effect... this crosstalk will change signal loading esp the hi freq harmonics.
3) dso trigger threshold. ds1000z is known for its weakness in this regards... https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/rigol-ds1054z-unable-to-trigger-cal-signal-at-lt-0-6v/msg855558/#msg855558 (https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/rigol-ds1054z-unable-to-trigger-cal-signal-at-lt-0-6v/msg855558/#msg855558)
4) and last but not least, the so much disputed "sample aliasing" resulting in different sinc output seen on the screen...
all of these and probably more, contribute to the effect... my 2cnts...
Let's not start this again from the beginning, please. Read the thread more carefully.
-
Thank you everyone for your help. This was a very interesting case where a bunch of factors contributed to what seemed like a truly odd phenomenon. I just happened to have my trigger set to a level where even very slight variations in the signal would cause dramatic effects. Combine that with the sub-optimal probing method I was initially using, and I was asking for trouble.
I've learned a lot from this thread, and it has helped me continue troubleshooting the 3325A I showed in the original video. Thank you all!