Author Topic: Anyone who bought a Rigol DG4062 wish they would have bought a DG4102 or DG4162?  (Read 19430 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline boeserbaer

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 21
While this is a bit stale,

I recently bought a dg4062.  Perfectly happy with it.  It is unrestricted as a 500MSPS AWG.  The sine wave limits of 60MHz are very acceptable to me.

Best Regards,  Mike
 

Offline Electro FanTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3199
While this is a bit stale,

I recently bought a dg4062.  Perfectly happy with it.  It is unrestricted as a 500MSPS AWG.  The sine wave limits of 60MHz are very acceptable to me.

Best Regards,  Mike

Hi boeserbaer,

Any chance you could do the test AndyC_772 did in Reply 2 of this thread to see if you get the same results?  (Maybe you have newer firmware or something is different now?) 

https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/anyone-who-bought-a-rigol-dg4062-wish-they-would-have-bought-a-dg4102-or-dg4162/msg292628/#msg292628

Thanks, EF

« Last Edit: December 04, 2014, 06:30:17 pm by Electro Fan »
 

Offline csatti

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 1
  • Country: hu
I have a DG4062 and I had run this test for you (I was also wondering if it is really that bad). I had a much better result (the leading and trailing can't be shorter than 11ns it seems).
 

Offline Teneyes

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 498
  • Country: ca
(the leading and trailing can't be shorter than 11ns it seems).
For fast rise and fall times , I use the DG4062 sync output
IiIiIiIiIi  --  curiosity killed the cat but, satisfaction brought it back
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf