Just asked him, he has the 150 MHz version so pictures are not usefull.. But he knows both scopes (i think he knows all Hamegs
) He told me the 507 is the better choise. The 407 isd the older version of the 50 MHz 507. But both are good. If the price is not the problem choose the 507.
By the way, a picture will be rather useless because you do not state a frequency, nor the quality of the generator, termination, cable quality etc. I can make a picture on one of my scopes from a squarewave so bad you think the scope is a waist of money or so good you think, I want one too.
A usable test is feeding it in a perfect 50 Ohm environment with a very fast step/pulse and low frequency (50-100 kHz is good). The puls must have a Tr that is much faster as the scope and a well known amplitude. Pulse duration must be long enough. At least a few times longer as the ritetime of the scope. For instance for a 50 MHz scope a 1ns puls that stays about a 5 or 10 ns high. But in that case all you know is bandwith and pulseresponse. But why bother, the specs Hameg gives are realistic, not marketing crap.
In a topic someone asked what the problem with his scope (or generator ? ) was. Placed pictures. Turned out his set up was wrong on all fronts so there was nothing wrong with both instruments. If he had made that picture for you,. you would get a wrong impression.
And it will not garantee you that the scope you buy will be in the same shape. It can be better or worse.