These things are not certified (or even certifiable!), you're supposed to press the 'calibrate' button every time you want an in-spec reading.
No to both of those assertions.
The method you use to 'certify' a 'scope (calibration verification) is to wait for the minimum warm-up time – people forget this, and it is important as a cold 'scope is almost always going to be significantly out – then record the ambient temperature (and humidity, usually, for a lab) and run the 'self-cal' routine. After it passes that routine you then perform the recommended verification procedure (or the customer requested one, or your in-house procedure if the manufacturer doesn't have one). Usually the temperature can vary by a couple of degrees with no significant impact, so recording the ambient conditions at the end of the procedure is usually going to be sufficient (unless your lab is in a barn or something
).
This provides reasonable proof that the 'scope meets specifications (or doesn't, or is ambiguous) under the manufacturer's recommended usage conditions – warm-up time and 'self cal', generally. If it is out of spec, or very close to it, then the customer may request adjustment and a post-adjustment verification.
As an aside: most engineers I have come across are convinced that scopes do not require any form of certification. They just
know that a reading is right or wrong using their special engineer-electrical parameter mind-meld technique (or something). They're also pretty dismissive of the value of certifying or verifying anything, generally. Just because your components have ten percent tolerances and you design around that does not mean it isn't a good idea to know whether you have 3.3 V or 3.2 V (or worse) when you check that design – 'knowledge is power' and so forth.