Author Topic: Brymen BM789  (Read 22564 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Neutrion

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 305
  • Country: hu
Re: Brymen BM789
« Reply #175 on: September 29, 2023, 10:14:24 am »


The following Brymen meters have 20/second update in REC (aka MAX/MIN) mode (not a comprehensive list):

  - BM257s
  - BM525s
  - BM817s (Amprobe AM-270)

The 20/second display update isn't really useful as far as the display goes - if the numbers are changing fast, they're just a blur - better to look at the bargraph.  Of course, the important thing is it helps ensure that the meter will catch very short MAX & MIN durations.

The 10/s update on the BM789's display is not a blur, but "well" readable, so it could be useful sometimes when the baragraphs resolution is not enough.


As far as busting the 87V, I'd say "not so fast"!  The 87V's default MIN/MAX record rate is 100ms (10/second), just like the BM789.  It's just that it doesn't update the digital display any faster (the min/max is taken from the bargraph reading).

Also, the Fluke 87V and many of the Brymens support a "Peak" or "Crest" mode where the min/max is captured for very short transients (0.25ms for the 87V and 0.25ms-5ms for the Brymens depending on the model).  In this mode the display doesn't update continuously - it shows the MAX or MIN value (whichever you select)


The BM789's manual doesnt say anything about the different display update rate, but in REC mode it says the signal duration must be DC 300ms AC 460ms and there is the nominal update rate mentioned, I suppose for the measurement. Because it is 10 for AC but the display stays at 5/sec.
Crest mode says 0,35 ms signal duration. But it goes a bit lower.
JoeQSmith did once a test of the crest modes of some meters, unfotunately the BM789 was not there yet.

It would be a nice test to see how the meters behave with singe glitches, and different signal heights, especially in Amps mode.

But anyway in display update the BM789 beats the Fluke, also in normal mode and in baragraph wiev  ;D
 

Online joeqsmith

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11601
  • Country: us
Re: Brymen BM789
« Reply #176 on: September 29, 2023, 01:52:02 pm »
...
JoeQSmith did once a test of the crest modes of some meters, unfotunately the BM789 was not there yet.

It would be a nice test to see how the meters behave with singe glitches, and different signal heights, especially in Amps mode.
...

I could repeat it with what ever meters I have.  I think I had used a constant height and varied the pulse width.  Because the meters all work differently, it's a manual process.   Adding different signal amplitudes and modes would add a bit of time.   Currently my office is a big mess with several projects going on.  Maybe once things settle down we can set it up.
 
The following users thanked this post: mwb1100

Offline mwb1100

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 523
  • Country: us
Re: Brymen BM789
« Reply #177 on: September 29, 2023, 05:03:28 pm »
The 10/s update on the BM789's display is not a blur, but "well" readable, so it could be useful sometimes when the baragraphs resolution is not enough.

You're right that the 10/second update isn't too bad.  I found the meters with 20/second update were just a blur when things were changing.

The BM789's manual doesnt say anything about the different display update rate, but in REC mode it says the signal duration must be DC 300ms AC 460ms and there is the nominal update rate mentioned, I suppose for the measurement. Because it is 10 for AC but the display stays at 5/sec.
I only verified that the nominal update rate of 10/second in the table for DCV seemed to match up with what I saw and I then assumed that the REC update rates in that table for other modes would match the display updates in REC mode.  But I didn't actually test anything other than DCV (in particular the 10/second the table also shows for ACV).  Just goes to show that you have to verify everything!

 

Offline Neutrion

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 305
  • Country: hu
Re: Brymen BM789
« Reply #178 on: September 30, 2023, 01:23:05 pm »
...
JoeQSmith did once a test of the crest modes of some meters, unfotunately the BM789 was not there yet.

It would be a nice test to see how the meters behave with singe glitches, and different signal heights, especially in Amps mode.
...

I could repeat it with what ever meters I have.  I think I had used a constant height and varied the pulse width.  Because the meters all work differently, it's a manual process.   Adding different signal amplitudes and modes would add a bit of time.   Currently my office is a big mess with several projects going on.  Maybe once things settle down we can set it up.
It would be great! Especially to know the blind time of the meters, or if the update rate is really only a few per seconds, so whether glitches close to eachoder pass through without getting catched.
So the waveform update per second basically. :)
I tried to find the mentioned video of yours without luck, can yan you tell which one it was?


I only verified that the nominal update rate of 10/second in the table for DCV seemed to match up with what I saw and I then assumed that the REC update rates in that table for other modes would match the display updates in REC mode.  But I didn't actually test anything other than DCV (in particular the 10/second the table also shows for ACV).  Just goes to show that you have to verify everything!




If you have an another FW than 08 you could test whether it may gives you 10/sec with AC as well. But I don't think it will.  Maybe with a faster changing higher than 50Hz sine wave?
 

Offline mwb1100

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 523
  • Country: us
Re: Brymen BM789
« Reply #179 on: September 30, 2023, 07:38:05 pm »
If you have an another FW than 08 you could test whether it may gives you 10/sec with AC as well. But I don't think it will.  Maybe with a faster changing higher than 50Hz sine wave?

Mine (BM786) is also FW 08. I'm sure your observations are correct (also I'm fine with 5/sec update).
 

Offline floobydust

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6899
  • Country: ca
Re: Brymen BM789
« Reply #180 on: October 01, 2023, 07:28:39 pm »
Weeks ago, I contacted Emerson/Greenlee about doing Brymen product service/repair and received no response.
The website can only give you an RMA # from a picklist of valid Greenlee products- so you can't enter anything alien.
Until I hear otherwise, it's a myth you can get Brymen anything in North America - sales and service or calibration.

My theory is they are locked out of the region due to contract with Brymen as an OEM.
1,117kg or 66 cartons is a lot of multimeters per the HTS code, on the container ship One Theseus. It ain't test leads lol.
 

Online joeqsmith

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11601
  • Country: us
Re: Brymen BM789
« Reply #181 on: October 01, 2023, 08:08:06 pm »
...
JoeQSmith did once a test of the crest modes of some meters, unfotunately the BM789 was not there yet.

It would be a nice test to see how the meters behave with singe glitches, and different signal heights, especially in Amps mode.
...

I could repeat it with what ever meters I have.  I think I had used a constant height and varied the pulse width.  Because the meters all work differently, it's a manual process.   Adding different signal amplitudes and modes would add a bit of time.   Currently my office is a big mess with several projects going on.  Maybe once things settle down we can set it up.
It would be great! Especially to know the blind time of the meters, or if the update rate is really only a few per seconds, so whether glitches close to eachoder pass through without getting catched.
So the waveform update per second basically. :)
I tried to find the mentioned video of yours without luck, can yan you tell which one it was?

I think I have ran it a few times.  This was from about 8 years ago with the 87V.   
https://youtu.be/UZPjG892C40?t=95

I was firing a one-shot and reducing the duration.  The meters have to be reset so I am not sure what you are asking for with the blind time.  Personally, I wouldn't have much use for feature.  If I am looking at short pulses, I am most likely wanting more detail than what the meters can provide.     

Offline Neutrion

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 305
  • Country: hu
Re: Brymen BM789
« Reply #182 on: October 03, 2023, 02:16:16 pm »
Yes, this was it. Was it really one single pulse, so the scope was just stoped after it? As it seems on the right side of the screen as if another pulse was coming.
You mean by reset, to reset the screen I suppose?
What I meant that if the update rate 10 per sec doesn't mean screen updating, than it could mean that with two short impulses after each other with the second one bigger (so manual screen updating would not be necessary) if it is within 1/10 second of eachother, the second one could pass unnoticed.
I am interested in how rare single glitches might could go unnoticed under certain circumstances.
Or with tricky  waveforms.
Like a VFD puts out a single burst of a PWM waveform with only a few squarewaves, which might won't get properly recognized. Or any of the waveforms you tested the RMS funcions with. This is where min/max, crest etc would be used with the meter, especially with higher voltages before getting a scope.

And of course if the 10/sec would be only screen update, maybe later firmwares got it right for AC as well.
 

Online joeqsmith

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11601
  • Country: us
Re: Brymen BM789
« Reply #183 on: October 03, 2023, 02:46:24 pm »
Yes, this was it. Was it really one single pulse, so the scope was just stoped after it? As it seems on the right side of the screen as if another pulse was coming.
You mean by reset, to reset the screen I suppose?

I just watched it and indeed it is live data.  For some reason I was thinking it was a one-shot.   So, yes it is not a single pulse.  Seems the 869s requires you to reset the meter to start a new measurement but maybe not.  Again, I own a scope so this isn't something I would normally have a use for.   

What I meant that if the update rate 10 per sec doesn't mean screen updating, than it could mean that with two short impulses after each other with the second one bigger (so manual screen updating would not be necessary) if it is within 1/10 second of eachother, the second one could pass unnoticed.

I would imagine some meters have hardware to do the peak detect but maybe not.   I dare say the update rate of the CEM is much slower the pulse we are trying to measure.

I am interested in how rare single glitches might could go unnoticed under certain circumstances.
Or with tricky  waveforms.
Like a VFD puts out a single burst of a PWM waveform with only a few squarewaves, which might won't get properly recognized. Or any of the waveforms you tested the RMS funcions with. This is where min/max, crest etc would be used with the meter, especially with higher voltages before getting a scope.

And of course if the 10/sec would be only screen update, maybe later firmwares got it right for AC as well.

That's where the scope come into play.   Well, for me anyway.   That old Fluke scope meter has been nice to have.   

Offline TDA1541AS2

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 3
  • Country: au
Re: Brymen BM789
« Reply #184 on: October 06, 2023, 12:55:12 pm »
Hi all,
I just received my new BM789 DMM firmware V12.
In regards to the duty cycle function being within the mV setting, what would the upper voltage limit be for taking duty cycle measurements? Could I safely use it with mains voltages? 240VAC
Thanks,
Daniel
 

Online joeqsmith

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11601
  • Country: us
Re: Brymen BM789
« Reply #185 on: October 06, 2023, 01:02:22 pm »
Guessing AI bot but hey, I'll bite.   Are you well educated?  Skilled electrician?  I wouldn't have my sister working on anything mains even with a proper handheld meter. 

Offline mastershake

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 411
  • Country: us
Re: Brymen BM789
« Reply #186 on: October 08, 2023, 11:46:54 pm »
To be clear - there is no North American support for these Brymen multimeters such as repair, calibration, firmware updates? It's gotta be shipped trans-ocean for any of that?

correct if you want support you have to buy it under the greenlee brand instead but the prices are MUCH higher that way sometimes double even.
 

Online EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37626
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: Brymen BM789
« Reply #187 on: October 09, 2023, 01:13:23 am »
To be clear - there is no North American support for these Brymen multimeters such as repair, calibration, firmware updates? It's gotta be shipped trans-ocean for any of that?
correct if you want support you have to buy it under the greenlee brand instead but the prices are MUCH higher that way sometimes double even.

I think I'd happily offer a "lifetime" warranty for double the price, or even 50% more.
 

Offline TDA1541AS2

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 3
  • Country: au
Re: Brymen BM789
« Reply #188 on: October 09, 2023, 01:30:05 pm »
[
Guessing AI bot but hey, I'll bite.   Are you well educated?  Skilled electrician?  I wouldn't have my sister working on anything mains even with a proper handheld meter. 

Not AI bot. (Whatever that is in this warped world)
I'm an electronics engineer with audio interest.
I'm asking the above (re: duty cycle measurements) as I had a cheapo dmm that had the duty cycle available in the normal volts range and able to take the measurement at 240vac levels.
But I guess I wouldn't be able to it with the BM789. (OR can I?)
Not willing to damage my meter or test it without a good understanding.
Also, the Brymen manual has bugger all stated in the specs regarding the operational limits of the mV range.
 ???
 

Offline Caliaxy

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 278
  • Country: us
Re: Brymen BM789
« Reply #189 on: October 09, 2023, 02:06:17 pm »
Duty cycle is only specified in the manual for “5V logic”. I don’t think you’ll damage the meter by applying a higher voltage on the mV range, but you’ll get an “overload” reading.
 

Offline TDA1541AS2

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 3
  • Country: au
Re: Brymen BM789
« Reply #190 on: October 09, 2023, 02:16:54 pm »
Ok, thank you.
That makes sense  :-+
 

Online joeqsmith

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11601
  • Country: us
Re: Brymen BM789
« Reply #191 on: October 09, 2023, 07:27:57 pm »
[
Guessing AI bot but hey, I'll bite.   Are you well educated?  Skilled electrician?  I wouldn't have my sister working on anything mains even with a proper handheld meter. 

Not AI bot. (Whatever that is in this warped world)
I'm an electronics engineer with audio interest.
I'm asking the above (re: duty cycle measurements) as I had a cheapo dmm that had the duty cycle available in the normal volts range and able to take the measurement at 240vac levels.
But I guess I wouldn't be able to it with the BM789. (OR can I?)
Not willing to damage my meter or test it without a good understanding.
Also, the Brymen manual has bugger all stated in the specs regarding the operational limits of the mV range.
 ???

....Could I safely use it with mains voltages? 240VAC

When you asked the above question, you were not referring to your personal safety but rather the meters ability to withstand it.   "... and able to take the measurement at 240vac levels"

From that perspective, I did much worse to this meter than what you are proposing and it held up just fine.  That said, let me try it tonight and see if I can get a good measurement.     

Online joeqsmith

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11601
  • Country: us
Re: Brymen BM789
« Reply #192 on: October 09, 2023, 10:52:54 pm »
Being a EE myself, I can't think of one time where I wanted to measure the duty cycle of the mains but what ever floats your boat.   Both meters in parallel, 60Hz sinewaveish, 240V.   Of course, you follow my videos, you would know this isn't going to pose a problem for this particular meter.   Even some of the cheapest ones I look at with their lack of a surge resistor and tiny 5mm PTCs would handle this just fine.       



 
The following users thanked this post: Veteran68

Offline Hydrawerk

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2598
  • Country: 00
Re: Brymen BM789
« Reply #193 on: October 29, 2023, 10:54:49 pm »
It is time for a partial teardown of BM789. One screw is missing, but I do not care.
Amazing machines. https://www.youtube.com/user/denha (It is not me...)
 

Online EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37626
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: Brymen BM789
« Reply #194 on: October 29, 2023, 11:15:22 pm »
I've given up all hope of them releasing the Bluetooth version.
 

Offline floobydust

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6899
  • Country: ca
Re: Brymen BM789
« Reply #195 on: October 30, 2023, 03:41:47 am »
How much memory do they have left?
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf