Author Topic: Rigol 1054 triggering  (Read 3483 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sndchaserTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 4
  • Country: us
Rigol 1054 triggering
« on: September 25, 2016, 01:41:50 am »
Question with a problem (likely user error) I'm having with my Rigol 1054 that I didn't have with my Tektronix scopes.  I'm edge triggering, have the trigger level set, and on some signals I get the expected triggering (1st picture) and on others I get a blur (like the other pictures).  I'd appreciate it if someone could point out what I'm doing wrong.  Thanks
 

Offline sndchaserTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 4
  • Country: us
Re: Rigol 1054 triggering
« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2016, 02:06:07 am »
Persistence is on Min.  I put it on normal triggering and still get the blur.  With single triggering I see that my duty cycle is irregular, so I guess this triggering behavior for auto and normal is as intended? 
« Last Edit: September 25, 2016, 02:17:11 am by sndchaser »
 

Offline tautech

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28328
  • Country: nz
  • Taupaki Technologies Ltd. Siglent Distributor NZ.
    • Taupaki Technologies Ltd.
Re: Rigol 1054 triggering
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2016, 02:22:32 am »
I put it on normal triggering and still get the blur.  With single triggering I see that my duty cycle is irregular, so I guess this triggering behavior for auto and normal is as intended?

This looks like a data stream and your rising edge triggering probably isn't helping for a negative going signal.
Also if it is a data stream it's not a repetitive waveform and therefore triggering will not be stable without additional trigger parameters being set.
The clue is a blurry waveform that it's not repetitive and confirmed with the Single shot.
Avid Rabid Hobbyist
Siglent Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@SiglentVideo/videos
 
The following users thanked this post: sndchaser

Offline sndchaserTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 4
  • Country: us
Re: Rigol 1054 triggering
« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2016, 02:27:42 am »
Surprisingly, it's actually not a data stream, it's an apparently defective frequency divider IC (it should take the 500kHz signal from the stable shot and divide it down to each frequency in an octave of musical notes).  I've seen the blur on other analog signals with this scope, just curious what other triggering parameters I could be trying to get stable triggering?
 

Online Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16642
  • Country: 00
Re: Rigol 1054 triggering
« Reply #4 on: September 25, 2016, 05:37:47 am »
just curious what other triggering parameters I could be trying to get stable triggering?

Your trigger is stable. It's the signal that's wonky.



If you pick a random rising edge in that signal then the data on either side is unpredictable.
 

Offline sndchaserTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 4
  • Country: us
Re: Rigol 1054 triggering
« Reply #5 on: September 25, 2016, 10:51:32 am »
Yes, the chip is an MK50240 from the 1970's:

http://www.datasheetspdf.com/datasheet/MK50240.html

It really just divides a square wave into 13 slower square waves.   Way before I2S was even dreamed of.   The triggering wasn't working as I expected it to because the chip has failed. 
 

Offline David Hess

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16607
  • Country: us
  • DavidH
Re: Rigol 1054 triggering
« Reply #6 on: September 25, 2016, 08:30:53 pm »
Automatic triggering just means that after a period of time without a valid trigger, the acquisition or sweep is started anyway so at least something is displayed.  Normal triggering always waits for a valid trigger.  On a Tektronix you can check this condition via the trigger indicator; I don't know if Rigol includes this.

You should have gotten the same results with a Rigol or Tektronix oscilloscope.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf