If I would go for an MSO1074Z after all, instead of an MSO2072A, what would be the most annoying limitation or most missed feature?
Why would I regret that I didn't go for the MSO2072A after all, if I would not need the BW and the big knob?
Can some one tell me this in a very good high-level summary?
I suspect you can get along with the bandwidth, and the "Big Knob" certainly makes Navigation simpler. But if you haven't gotten used to it, you probably won't miss it that much. You certainly can get around without it.
I already shared with you the 2 biggest annoyances/limitations for me of the 1000Z, which I actually like a lot. No CAN, which may not be of any interest to you. But I do a lot of embedded comms work, using all the protocols Rigol supports (and a handful of others), and CAN is about 30% of that work. For me to buy another scope,
with protocol capabilities, and NOT get CAN would seem a bit foolish. That may not apply to others though.
The other is the lack of time-stamps in Segmented acquisition mode. Many times you just don't need them. I.e., it doesn't matter if 2 consecutive occurrences happened 1 msec apart, or an hour apart. But sometimes it does.
The 2000 has that, and the 1000Z doesn't. That doesn't mean though that if a situation does arise that you DO need them, there are no options to work around it. I.e., you could use the trigger-out the Rigol generates on each occurrence, and send it to something else to time-stamp it. Another scope, a PC, a plotter, etc. But that's extra work, and often a hassle to correlate afterwards.
If you want to look at 720P/1080i/1080P HD video signals, the 1000Z will not allow that. It maxes out at 480P/576P. That may be something you never need. But it's unfortunate that component video, which has 3-channels (Y,U,V) would be a good match for the 4-channel 1000Z, but the scan-rate is too high. While the 2000 handles the extra lines, but comes up 1-channel short.
The biggest protocol limitation of the DS2000 is it doesn't really do SPI, but that problem is completely eliminated with the MSO2000. It can actually do two full 4-signal SPI busses (as can the MSO1000Z).
There were at least 2 people here, and ElectroFan was one of them, that started out with a DS1000Z, then switched to the DS2000. They may be able to give you their reasons for doing so, which should also apply to the MSO versions. Or you could just do a search, because they already explained their reasons in detail (quite a while back). I don't have time to try and dig it up again.
The extended LA capabilities of the 2 MSO units don't differ much at all (very, very close), though the RPL-2316 probes with the 2000 are a bit nicer than the RPL-1116 probes with the 1000Z. However, functionally they're both very good, and a large step up from the LA section of the previous generation of DS1xxxD models (or the DS1102CD that I have). The digital-section differences are very minor (+/-15V threshold setting on the 1000Z, vs. +/-20V on the 2000 is the major one), compared to the analog sections.