Seek Pro.
This is why I suggested buying used - you can get a used Pro(320x240) for a little less than a brand new XR(206x156 + VAT), if you look around.
So both Seek and Seek XR have adjustable focus, is the eXtended Range needed for PCB? The other use I am buying it for is to do a DIY "thermal audit" on my house - so I don't really need an extended range unless this could be better for PCB troubleshooting.
The XR has a longer focal length, which means you get a narrower field of view. It should generally help with PCB work, but it's only the XR and Pro that have focusing, so it's the only two to buy. It could also help with the house thermal audit, but it may be a little cumbersome since you'll get less of the house in frame from the same distance - though it's a perk in terms of the Seek, because the sensor is, to put it lightly, sub-par - it's much smaller(if not many times) than the FLIR Ex/Exx/Thermal Expert/Therm-App sensors.
So are we ruling out the Flir for PCB inspection then? The MSX feature is useless when doing close-ups and if not mistaken the Flir does not have manual focus. If this is the case it has to be a Seek, correct?
Correct. It's useless for PCB work and the latest Gen3 cameras are ridiculously overpriced - the $200 model only has the old 80x60 Lepton 2, and the "better" $500 Pro is as good as the previous generation, as they both have the 160x120 Lepton3. In terms of thermal performance, it's less noisy, but the drop in resolution and lack of focus are a big no-no.