EEVblog Electronics Community Forum
A Free & Open Forum For Electronics Enthusiasts & Professionals
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
This topic
This board
Entire forum
Google
Bing
Home
Help
Search
About us
Links
Login
Register
EEVblog Electronics Community Forum
»
Electronics
»
PCB/EDA/CAD
»
Altium Designer
»
Polygon same net clearance
« previous
next »
Print
Search
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Polygon same net clearance (Read 5432 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
stejo780
Contributor
Posts: 12
Country:
Polygon same net clearance
«
on:
March 01, 2016, 10:15:41 pm »
Hi,
I have trouble to set up a polygon to pads clearance rule when the two are in the same net. More precisely GND pads to a GND polygon on an outer layer. The clearance rule for the polygon in beautifully followed when repouring the polygon for other nets, but not for same net, even though my rule is set to "Any Net".
Perhaps the attached image tells the story better. The online DRC triggers that there is an error, but the rule is not followed when the polygon is repoured. Any suggestions how to solve this?
Kind Regards,
Stefan
Logged
T3sl4co1l
Super Contributor
Posts: 22435
Country:
Expert, Analog Electronics, PCB Layout, EMC
Re: Polygon same net clearance
«
Reply #1 on:
March 01, 2016, 11:29:52 pm »
What pour type is the polygon set as? Usually you want "pour over all net objects".
Tim
Logged
Seven Transistor Labs, LLC
Electronic design, from concept to prototype.
Bringing a project to life? Send me a message!
stejo780
Contributor
Posts: 12
Country:
Re: Polygon same net clearance
«
Reply #2 on:
March 02, 2016, 08:35:14 am »
Yes, it is set to "pour over all net objects", if I change this the polygon does not pour over the GND vias, which it must.
I have included screenshots of the rule and the polygon properties.
Thanks for your help,
Stefan
Logged
stejo780
Contributor
Posts: 12
Country:
Re: Polygon same net clearance
«
Reply #3 on:
March 02, 2016, 08:37:00 am »
The only solution I have in mind right now is to place keep outs, but that should not really be necessary, should it?
Cheers,
Stefan
Logged
tautech
Super Contributor
Posts: 31186
Country:
Taupaki Technologies Ltd. Siglent Distributor NZ.
Re: Polygon same net clearance
«
Reply #4 on:
March 02, 2016, 08:46:02 am »
Change the layer somehow to include the layer the vias are on. If not in the Layer menu you'll probably have to tweak the rules.
Logged
Avid
Rabid
Hobbyist.
On holiday, very limited support available......
stejo780
Contributor
Posts: 12
Country:
Re: Polygon same net clearance
«
Reply #5 on:
March 02, 2016, 09:13:55 am »
I changed the polygon connect type to relief instead of none for the pads. In that way I could control the clerance and the width of the legs. Not exactly what I had in mind, but good enough for now
Cheers,
Stefan
Logged
Christe4nM
Supporter
Posts: 252
Country:
Re: Polygon same net clearance
«
Reply #6 on:
March 03, 2016, 04:32:56 pm »
I remember having problems with the "InPolygon" selector before in exactly the same way. What I do is create a 2 specific rules for "Polygon Connect Style" set to 'Direct Connect' and with highest priority.
Rule 1: when everything in the same net needs a direct connect
- First object matches: "InNet("NetNameHere") => OR all relevant Nets. If required make a seperate rule for each layer / AND with "OnLayer()"
- Second object matches: ALL
Rule 2: when only some components require a direct connect, other need thermal reliefs
- First object matches: ( InNet("NetNameHere") AND (InComponent("Comp1") OR InComponent("Comp2")) => specifies which component in a net need a direct connect. OR the whole selector for other nets. Or for clarity create a single rule per net + component set.
- Second object matches: ALL
Logged
Print
Search
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Share me
Smf
EEVblog Electronics Community Forum
»
Electronics
»
PCB/EDA/CAD
»
Altium Designer
»
Polygon same net clearance
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
EEVblog Main Site
EEVblog on Youtube
EEVblog on Twitter
EEVblog on Facebook
EEVblog on Odysee