Electronics > Beginners

AC analysis results (I think)

<< < (2/2)

T3sl4co1l:
There's no supply voltage because the mains source is AC=0.

Replace it with a DC source ;)

Tim

Jiggerypook:
Well, I took Tim's advice and had results that I could not make sense of. Thank you Tim for your response. It was unexpected. It's obvious that I am too noob to think that I can analyse a circuit such as this using techniques that professionals use in ltSpice. Was I looking at frequency response in a DC system or phase relationships between voltage and current at different frequencies. (confused) and then what does that even mean for stability? (lost).

 I realize the limitations of simulations and do not put my full trust in the results. I played with Circuitmaker decades ago and it was horrible to say the least.
 I have limited background and was sort of asking what I should be looking for, and some guidance in that respect.
 I had previously done a lot of work trying to make that old Greek supply that everybody knows about work, but is slower than snails in January in current limiting, and is faulted in many other ways.
 I came upon Kleinstien's model in a post on this forum and loved it's simplicity and functionality.
 I had been looking at HP drawings and been totally lost.
 I need a power supply to use as a tool to pursue my interest in electronics now that I am in my senior years and have the time. That being said I have a few questions, and I hope that I don't offend anyone on this forum.

1. Is anyone willing to help me on a scale that I can understand so that I may learn? (I never took calculus in high school 50 years ago) but I am a grade 12 graduate and electrician by trade.
2. Has anyone else used this design, or one similar successfully? (examples to learn from)
3. Should I just build it and let the smoke out of multiple components? (Learn the hard way)
4. Do I start too many sentences with "I"?

I don't expect, and am not asking for someone to do the work for me, that's not learning, I just need to be pointed in the right direction.
I love "Daves" videos and have been following the courses from "Digilent" if I am allowed to say that here.
I know that once I feel more comfortable on this forum I will be starting fewer sentences with "I" and maybe even eventually helping someone myself.
I hope that I get as many eyes on this post as I have in my sentences. lol!

T3sl4co1l:
To expand that a bit more -- an AC analysis requires DC voltages and bias.  The mains input is a sine feeding diodes -- the diodes will be approximated at the sine's DC setting (which is zero), and the transformer blocks DC anyway, so there's no power.  A rectifier is nonlinear, and nonlinearity just isn't simulated in an AC analysis.

So you need to replace rectifier with a DC source so it gets power at all. :)

Or, do a transient analysis, and figure out the behavior from waveforms.

To get all the rich nonlinear behavior, you have to use transient analysis.  If you want to get AC analysis style results, you basically have to instrument it yourself -- set up sources and AC detectors and let it run for a while to reach steady state.  Big pain. :(

You should still use a DC source, since you'll be waiting forever for the rectifier to start up.

Tim

Jiggerypook:
Here is what I have managed. I'm attempting the Middlebrook analysis but it is all very new to me so I have probably made several mistakes. I assumed that the feedback loop for current control would be the inverting input of U2-a on my schematic. If this is not correct, please let me know.

The resulting graph doesn't seem to look like anything I have seen before so I assume that I have done something wrong. Probably a good example of "garbage in-garbage out.

Actually I really don't know what to look for that indicate possibilities of stability.
Do the crossing points indicate where the signals are in phase? What qualities am I looking for to indicate stability?
What role if any does Impedance, Resonance,or Reactance play?

I know, too many questions, read more, etc. I just need to know if I am remotely headed in the right direction.

Jiggerypook:
OK. I've taken a complex problem, looking for a simple answer which doesn't exist (therefore little response) and it was wrong on my part. thanks IMO and Tim for enlightening me on this subject.
I'm just going to breadboard the thing and hope for the best. I've just got to dream up some good torture tests now and put the scope to use. That's what I call jiggerypooking. Blindly experimenting and learning from whatever results. Who cares about the math anyways. (smoke-crackle-pop!) lol. Just like the zeppelin.
Thank you Klienstien for the circuit to replace the 1984 circuit that I had originally started this project with in 1986 and now finally have the time to finish in my retirement. If it works out you will hear from me, if it doesn't you will hear from me. I never gave up in 1986 I just had no time and the internet was brand new and not very useful. bla bla bla ........ :blah:

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod