Thanks for the feedbacks guys, RG-174 it is.
I made myself a couple of RG-174 and RG-316 patch cables and while they are useful, their major disadvantage is that the thinner cable is fragile compared to a thicker cable. My favorite patch cables use RG-400 which is the diameter of RG-58 but double shielded.
As patch cables only which are only like 4 or 5 feet ( 150 cm) length, is there any significant difference between RG-174 and RG-316 ? What max working frequency do you usually work on when using these ?
RG-400, yeah, it would be an ideal like for fixed/permanent cable between T&M equipments, apart from double shielded, its also has stranded core that make the cable quite flexible compared to the stiff solid core coax, its only for patch cables. Its just really hard to find it locally here, and probably way too expensive for just few meters for my needs.
Anyone want to sell me just "few" meters of RG-400 ?