Author Topic: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?  (Read 19414 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline David Cutcher CEGTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 41
  • Country: ca
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #25 on: April 20, 2019, 12:12:28 am »
Exactly!
Course will be up on Udemy on July 1st.
Those who take the second module will either use
 the freeware, and probe that they make (1 M ohm : 100 k ohm voltage divider, input no more than 9 volts)
or
the  Owon VDS-1022 if they choose to purchase.
I might be able to help those who have varying 2nd hand stuff, but for the number of problems that can happen, I will limit my responses to those who choose to use other devices.
David Cutcher "Certified Evil Genius"
 

Online rstofer

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9963
  • Country: us
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #26 on: April 20, 2019, 01:10:11 am »
Clearly, it will be difficult to deal with all the myriad scopes students might use.  But there are tutorials all over the Internet so pushing the problem off to Google seems like an adequate response.

There will be a gigantic difference between the GUI interface of the Owon and the physical knobs of a real DSO.

I take the counter position on the Auto button (where fitted) because I might not remember how I left my scope the last time I used it.  Same for a student, they don't have a clue how the settings were left.  With the benefit of power-on using the last settings, the scope could be in some truly bizarre state.  Suppose they had labeled it "Reset" as in reset the settings to something reasonable.

Although I have a Tek 485, I take the counter position on buying and trying to maintain an analog scope.  Sure, they're cheap enough but if it breaks, a newcomer is in no position to fix it.  And shouldn't even be working inside the case!

I don't know what to think about the Owon and the isolation feature available at significant additional extra expense.  For the purposes of a course, I think I would go for the low bucks solution and skip the isolation.  Although I would constantly worry about frying my computer...  I need to think about this!

Down the road the student will be better served with a real DSO.
 

Offline rhb

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3516
  • Country: us
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #27 on: April 20, 2019, 01:28:00 am »
The best scope is whatever they have or can afford.  The Rigol DS1000E series is fairly cheap, but in the bang for the buck category the Siglent SDS1202X-E looks very good.  My Owon XDS2102A is great as a DAQ, but rather wretched as a bench instrument. At the moment I like the Instek GDS-2000E line best, but it's a lot more money.  I'm going to be getting a Siglent SDS1000X-E for a head to head comparison of Rigol, Siglent, Owon and Instek entry level DSOs.

I'm old and cruel.  I will be trying to break all of them.
 

Offline 0culus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3032
  • Country: us
  • Electronics, RF, and TEA Hobbyist
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #28 on: April 20, 2019, 01:29:44 am »
I guess the ideal situation is that the student has a mentor who can help them pick out and maintain their analog CRO. I do strongly agree that beginners ought to have "first contact" with an analog CRO if at all possible. Decent CROs are very intuitive to use as mentioned above and will teach them a lot more about running a scope manually. However, students on their own probably are best served by avoiding the pitfalls of old test equipment.

If it were me, I might couch something along the lines of "We recommend getting your first scope experience with an analog scope <and here's resources on how to find one to either buy or use, e.g. local hackerspaces etc.>, but do not open the case or attempt any sort of repair because there's voltages that will kill you in there." Then provide recommendations of modern equipment for everyone else.
 

Offline Gyro

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 10173
  • Country: gb
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #29 on: April 20, 2019, 08:30:45 am »
There will be a gigantic difference between the GUI interface of the Owon and the physical knobs of a real DSO.
Who knows, in the future we may find that the knobs become an anachronism (particularly if they keep using cheap Chinese encoders), and GUI becomes the norm when they start fitting them with decent sized screens, tablet style. Everything else seems to be heading that way.

Quote
I don't know what to think about the Owon and the isolation feature available at significant additional extra expense.  For the purposes of a course, I think I would go for the low bucks solution and skip the isolation.  Although I would constantly worry about frying my computer...  I need to think about this!

From my review, I think the isolated version is worth the (not so significant on ebay) difference. Yes its purpose is to break the ground loop rather than floating at elevated voltages (although the isolation components have decent rating). Trashing your PC isn't the best way to experience early stage learning, although they will have to understand the issue / danger of ground loops at some point. It also usefully reduces noise levels in some circumstances.
« Last Edit: April 20, 2019, 08:34:06 am by Gyro »
Best Regards, Chris
 

Offline DDunfield

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 173
  • Country: ca
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #30 on: April 20, 2019, 01:15:28 pm »
Just to chime in...

I have the VDS1022I (in my portable kit), as well as several bench scopes (incl DS1054Z) and a couple scopemeters.

I agree that physical knobs and switches are better on the bench that fiddling with a mouse, but the VDS is actually not too bad in this respect. They don't use idiotic "virtual knobs", the settings are just displayed, with drop-down menus when you click them. Easy to see the current setup, and easy to change things. I expect the newbies who've been using computers/GUIs "their whole life" will not have any problems with it.

As for starting with an analog scope, I do agree that for your very first exposure to a scope, and analog is simpler and the functions it performs tend to be more clearly understandable, but you don't have to go far in electronics (especially digital) before you want a DSO. Add to that that the VDS1022 is not a complex DSO and certainly can be used with just the basic functions in a manner almost exactly like an analog scope, and I don't think it's a bad starting point at all for a student.

Having all the students using the same thing will be a benefit, and the VDS1022 is probably a very good fit. It's new, so everyone can have the same one, it's inexpensive, and it works (going much cheaper gets you things that don't really work).

As far as the 'I' version, I would highly recommend it. I've seen it for as little as $10 more than the non-I. As far as the class goes, it won't make a difference as the function and software is exactly the same, those who really can't afford the difference would be able to use the non-'I' with no problems.

Dave
 

Offline james_s

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21611
  • Country: us
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #31 on: April 20, 2019, 05:36:59 pm »
Who knows, in the future we may find that the knobs become an anachronism (particularly if they keep using cheap Chinese encoders), and GUI becomes the norm when they start fitting them with decent sized screens, tablet style. Everything else seems to be heading that way.


I sure hope not. I loathe touchscreens, fingerprints everywhere, yuck. I tolerate it on my phone because it's not practical to have real input devices in my pocket but controlling a scope that way sounds painful.
 
The following users thanked this post: Cubdriver

Offline Gyro

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 10173
  • Country: gb
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #32 on: April 20, 2019, 06:13:14 pm »
I agree, but I'm 'of an age'. Who knows what the next generation will want... "Knobs are so last year"  :D


Edit: Just spotted case in point... https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/cheapest-touchscreen-oscillorscope/
« Last Edit: April 20, 2019, 08:34:36 pm by Gyro »
Best Regards, Chris
 

Offline exe

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2647
  • Country: nl
  • self-educated hobbyist
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #33 on: April 21, 2019, 05:45:48 am »
I sure hope not. I loathe touchscreens, fingerprints everywhere, yuck. I tolerate it on my phone because it's not practical to have real input devices in my pocket but controlling a scope that way sounds painful.

The choice of my first scope was heavily influenced but opinions like this. There is quite a bit of resistance from senior and experienced engineers who push back to have buttons on equipment. Now, looking back after more than one year of having to1104, I clearly see that most people who object touch-screens haven't even tried it. I'm not going to convince anyone that touch screens are "not that bad", "less evil than people think", etc. At the end It's a personal thing. But what I find not right is saying that "it must be bad because it sounds bad".

In my opinion touch control is superior to knobs because the user can directly manipulate the waveforms. It's hard to explain it, but when I work with my scope I feel like I can "touch" the waveform. I can zoom in and out (even though pinch zoom is not implemented, but there are buttons in the right place on the screen to do it), change sensitivity, offset, do measurements, all in a very intuitive way. Like, when I do measurements I just point on the screen right in the place where cursor should be, etc. It feels very intuitive. Not everything is ideal, there is a learning curve ("damn, where is my math function?", "how to adjust trigger??", "how to do fine adjustment?", "what if two waveform overlap, how to select the specific one?"), but after using my scope for a while I don't want to go back to knobs. To me bad experience with touch devices is a UI/UX problem, not a fundamental problem of touch screens per se. Not to say this opens opportunity to new form-factors.

I tried knobs, it was not up to my expectations. For example, on a four-channel scope I wanted dedicated controls for each channel because people say it's a way to go. In practice for me it was quite hard to get to the right knob. Dunno why, but I prefer single control for all channels with buttons to select active channel (sure it's a matter of practice, but still). Or cursor positioning. A good velocity control makes it easy to fine positioning, as well doing big adjustments, but I found that just dragging by a finger is more convenient.

Sorry for the long rant. I promised myself not to get involved in discussions like 'what's the best oscilloscope for beginners", "analog scope vs dso", "touch vs buttons", but at the end broke my own rules :). By no way I'm saying that I'm right and you are not. I just want to provide an alternative opinion so potential buyers do not remove touch scopes from consideration. There is also a place for hybrid controls, that's the way most if not all higher-end scopes do nowadays (even though knobs seems to be the primary way to control it).
 

Offline DDunfield

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 173
  • Country: ca
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #34 on: April 21, 2019, 03:00:12 pm »
I sure hope not. I loathe touchscreens, fingerprints everywhere, yuck. I tolerate it on my phone because it's not practical to have real input devices in my pocket but controlling a scope that way sounds painful.
The choice of my first scope was heavily influenced but opinions like this. There is quite a bit of resistance from senior and experienced engineers who push back to have buttons on equipment. Now, looking back after more than one year of having to1104, I clearly see that most people who object touch-screens haven't even tried it. I'm not going to convince anyone that touch screens are "not that bad", "less evil than people think", etc. At the end It's a personal thing. But what I find not right is saying that "it must be bad because it sounds bad".

FWIW, I don't mind the touch screen on my phone or tablets, but I dislike them on test equipment for the same reason I don't like them in my car .. you can't operate them without looking at them.
When I'm holding a probe on with one hand, and trying to glance at the screen from time to time, the last thing I want to do is have to focus on my other hand to make sure it hasn't drifted over to another control (which Murphy sez will really screw things up, and I won't know which one it was because I wasn't looking at it). Once I get my finger planted on a knob, I can pretty much keep them there without having to check.

Dave
 
The following users thanked this post: Tom45

Offline exe

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2647
  • Country: nl
  • self-educated hobbyist
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #35 on: April 21, 2019, 03:43:05 pm »
FWIW, I don't mind the touch screen on my phone or tablets, but I dislike them on test equipment for the same reason I don't like them in my car .. you can't operate them without looking at them.

Why would one want to operate the oscilloscope blindly? :) It's the tool to visualize in the first place, I do settings in trial-n-error approach, when I have to use vert/horiz controls and trigger until I see a satisfactory capture. There is more than one knob to adjust on a good scope... Anyway, I'm gonna say you how you should use your scope... Just I feel like we are discussing an imaginary scenario, not based on actual usage of a real touch-screen oscilloscope with a UI optimized for screen controls.

I personally found it more convenient to use virtual controls because they are closer to the waveform. I have my "adjusting" hand and the waveform in the same view, so no problems for me.

Of course, one may say that touch screens are glossy, they collect fingerprints, don't work with wet hands, etc. But I suggest just try micsig, it really has a good UI in terms of usability. A little bit slow to respond, but that's not an issue with a touchscreen.
 

Offline james_s

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21611
  • Country: us
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #36 on: April 21, 2019, 05:21:25 pm »
You don't operate it blindly, you change the setting you need to change, capture the event you want to see, then you look up at the screen.

I've been using touch screens on various equipment since they first started to get common around 30 years ago when I was just a kid. I hated them then and I hate them now, I've always had problems getting touches to register, or I bump it and end up with accidental touches. They get sticky and gross, they don't work well if your fingers are too moist or not moist enough. There is no tactile feedback, they're just irritating. I tolerate touchscreens when there is no better alternative but they are inferior to buttons.

I don't even want to get started on cars, whoever decided it would be a good idea to bury functions in nested menus that you have to try to operate while watching the road should be shot. All necessary functions in a car should be controlled by physical buttons and switches that I can operate by memory without taking my eyes off the road to look at them.
 
The following users thanked this post: gfmucci

Offline DDunfield

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 173
  • Country: ca
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #37 on: April 21, 2019, 05:57:40 pm »
Why would one want to operate the oscilloscope blindly? :) It's the tool to visualize in the first place, I do settings in trial-n-error approach, when I have to use vert/horiz controls and trigger until I see a satisfactory capture. There is more than one knob to adjust on a good scope...

Who said anything about "operating blindly" ... It's perfectly ok to not agree with another opinion, but why feel the need to ridicule it?

I can think of lots of cases where I use the controls without looking at them. (Just to be clear, I don't want to look at them because I'd rather focus on details of the waveform).

A few examples:

- Trying to capture an elusive event - repeatedly hitting the "Single/Arm/etc." key (ok, it's a key not a knob, but it has physical borders) - On a touch screen it's very easy to get "off" from the button, Just try to backspace character by character over a long line on your phone without looking at it. Once I decide to try again, I don't want to waste time making sure my finger is in the right spot. Since I can feel the button under it, I know it's in the right spot.

- Positioning the cursors .. I want to focus on putting them exactly where I want, not back and forth to the side of the screen for a "virtual control". Yeah, you might be able plant your finger on the screen, try not to cover up what you want to see and move them with the resolution afforded by a finger sliding on glass, but I happen to prefer a precision encoder.

- Getting just what I want on the screen, usually involves adjusting Horizontal scale and position .. two knobs right above/below each other on my scopes, easy to move between them by feel. Not so much if all you feel is a flat surface. For that matter, it's pretty easy to move back and forth to the vertical without looking.. use a scope enough and you will be able to operate much of it by "feel". And, yep, I recognize that for some UI's you can pinch and slide but again, I personally find it easier to perform precision adjustments with "out of band" rotary knobs than "in band" fingers on glass,


Another aspect of touch controls for bench instruments (not as significant for hand-held) is that you either have to rest your wrist on the bench, fingertips elsewhere on the device, or deal with a long "lever" (your arm) when making precision adjustments. The rotary motion of knobs provides better precision (for me at least) when my arm is unsupported than sliding side to side.


That's not say I wouldn't use a touch-screen scope, I feel the same way about having to twiddle controls with a mouse on PC based instruments, but I do it for my portable kit because a USB scope is the best compromise between size and functionality. That being said, given a choice, I prefer knobs and buttons I can manipulate by feel. I can have that luxury on my bench.


This is my opinion/experience, given to provide counterbalance to other welcome opinions presented in the discussion. In the end, the choice is up to the buyer.

Dave
 

Online rstofer

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9963
  • Country: us
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #38 on: April 21, 2019, 06:56:14 pm »
From my review, I think the isolated version is worth the (not so significant on ebay) difference. Yes its purpose is to break the ground loop rather than floating at elevated voltages (although the isolation components have decent rating). Trashing your PC isn't the best way to experience early stage learning, although they will have to understand the issue / danger of ground loops at some point. It also usefully reduces noise levels in some circumstances.

I run my Analog Discovery 2 through a powered hub.  It doesn't break the ground connection but the hub, rather than the PC, provides the power.

Believe me, I think about the possibilities of destruction every time I use a PC based 'thing' including uC boards connected to off-board things.  All run through the hub.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00VDVCQ84/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1

Breaking the ground connection is a better plan, no doubt.  I don't work on high voltage <anything>, +-15V is about my limit.  No real reason, I just don't work on things that operate at higher voltage.  If I want an SMPS at running off mains, I buy it!

I'm getting old and I have been using analog scopes for 60+ years including the one I built from the ARRL Handbook back around '58.  So, I have a wee bit of time in grade!

I don't see where spending any time with an analog scope teaches anything that can't be learned equally fast on a DSO.  There are only 3 elementary controls and they are identical:  Volts/div, Time/div and trigger level (polarity).  Yes, there is AC vs DC coupling and that is just as easy to change on a DSO as it is on an analog scope.  Tap the channel button and the selection button is at the top of the list.  Every single thing you can learn on an analog scope is equally easy to learn on a DSO.  Well, 'delayed sweep' might be a challenge but that's for the advanced user anyway.  I have NEVER used the feature on my Tek 485.  Not once!

If an analog scope was available, sure, use it!  If not, don't spend $5 buying one if the intent is to buy a DSO.  Well, maybe $5.  But certainly not $100.  I like my Tek 485, I got it cheap ($200) and it works well.  It sits, unused, under my bench since I got the DS1054Z.  The DSO has features the analog scope couldn't even dream of.  Measurements comes to mind!  How about Single Shot?  Try that with an analog scope (other than a storage scope).  Single Shot is the biggest feature of the DSO and it is truly important.

Want to get started with a DSO?  Connect the probe to the calibration output and press "Auto".  Then look at the screen to learn about Volts/div and Time/div.  Twist the knobs, see how the display changes.  Now progress at your leisure.  You know how to get the trace on the screen - something they used to have to put a "Beam Finder" button for in the old days of analog scopes and all it did was verify that the scope could provide a trace but didn't help find it  (think high voltage DC coupled with V/div set at some low value).

I'm not sure what to think about a USB scope.  Sure, my AD2 is USB based and the UI isn't horrible.  I don't know how the VDS1022I UI works.  I watched a short video but I can't say I was impressed.  So, in the near future, I'll buy one just to test it out.  They're cheap enough and I have an application so why not?

There are a lot of people taking the position that a new user should start with an analog scope.  Fine!  But tell me exactly WHY?  What are they going to learn that isn't nearly identical on a DSO?  I started with an analog scope (by definition) but now that I have had a DSO for a couple of years, I can't think of a single valid reason to recommend such a thing UNLESS the issue was bandwidth.  Price wise, a used high bandwidth analog scope is going to be a LOT cheaper than a new high bandwidth DSO.  But it's used...  And what about measurements?  Decoding? Single Shot?  The analog is about as useful as a '55 Ford.
« Last Edit: April 21, 2019, 06:59:35 pm by rstofer »
 
The following users thanked this post: gfmucci

Online rstofer

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9963
  • Country: us
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #39 on: April 21, 2019, 07:11:26 pm »
This is my opinion/experience, given to provide counterbalance to other welcome opinions presented in the discussion. In the end, the choice is up to the buyer.

And the market will decide...

I like knobs and buttons.  The modern DSO has too many adjustments to use physical knobs so I suppose the soft menu thing is here to stay.  I don't think I will rush right in for a touch screen unless I can use it with a mouse.
 
The following users thanked this post: gfmucci

Offline james_s

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21611
  • Country: us
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #40 on: April 21, 2019, 07:15:22 pm »
Why wouldn't a '55 Ford be useful? It would get you around just as well as a modern car and with a lot more style. It's easy to work on and can be repaired with basic tools.

I wouldn't say it's worth spending a lot on an analog scope but even after using a DSO for years I find there's something more "real" feeling about analog. You can turn down the sweep speed and see the beam moving in real time. I think there's some benefit to using one early on.

Likewise I think proficiency with a manual transmission should be mandatory to obtain a driver's license. It makes people better, more attentive and more engaged drivers.
 

Offline Gyro

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 10173
  • Country: gb
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #41 on: April 21, 2019, 08:36:20 pm »
I'm not sure what to think about a USB scope.  Sure, my AD2 is USB based and the UI isn't horrible.  I don't know how the VDS1022I UI works.  I watched a short video but I can't say I was impressed.  So, in the near future, I'll buy one just to test it out.  They're cheap enough and I have an application so why not?

Operation becomes a lot easier once you start using the, mostly undocumented, shortcuts.  ;)

https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/owon-vds1022i-quick-teardown-(versus-the-hantek-6022be)/msg827103/#msg827103

Don't forget to expand the image, which highlights the items numbered in the list.
« Last Edit: April 21, 2019, 08:41:27 pm by Gyro »
Best Regards, Chris
 
The following users thanked this post: rstofer

Offline exe

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2647
  • Country: nl
  • self-educated hobbyist
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #42 on: April 22, 2019, 12:08:08 pm »
I hear you guys and I see really nothing against touch screen, but just personal taste, which is fine. Again, the discussion itself doesn't really make any sense, as no "thought experiment" can replace real hands-on experience with a particular device. The potential problems mentioned here with touch ui, I simply have almost none of them :). May be because UI on micsigs works not the way it is assumed. Sure thing, if it was missing touches, had too tiny controls, hands were obstructing screen, etc, that reasoning would be valid. But those are just assumptions, not standing true *in my typical operation of the scope*. And it's not just me, you are welcome to read reviews and discussion in the relevant thread on this forum, including from reputable members: https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/micsig-to1104-(similar-to-rigol-1104z)/ (old version of firmare, but still representative) .

It's fine to like knobs, just don't generalize bad touch experience too much :)
 

Offline Old Printer

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 796
  • Country: us
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #43 on: April 22, 2019, 02:38:09 pm »
One thing I would mention with the USB scopes is the software, it can make or kill the usefulness of the hardware. The Picoscope and the Analog Discovery are the more expensive of the entry level USB scopes and their software gets great reviews. The Owons' and Hanteks' not so much. A few of the Hanteks are supported by Sigrok and i would investigate those and be wary of any low budget USB scope without Sigrok compatibility.
 
The following users thanked this post: exe

Offline Doctorandus_P

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4004
  • Country: nl
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #44 on: April 22, 2019, 04:15:44 pm »
Courses should not be made around some specific scope model.

A basic course about electronics shoul of course have some fair bits of info about oscilloscopes and how to use them, but it should not be dependent on a particular brand or model of scope.

So don't write, "push this or tha" button" ( with a screenshot), but write " Put your scope into AC-coupling mode."

It may seem easier for you to teach which button to push, but if your students do not learn what they are doing or why a particular measurement mode is preferable for the measurement at hand they won't learn much.

Even if your students can not afford them (yet), a chapter about some more advanced measurement modes of oscilloscopes and some differences between brands will help them make educated desicions for themself.

I've got an old Rigol DS1052 myself and tought about upgrading to a 4 channel Siglent. Then I realised that my old Rigol already is more scope than I actually need. I hacked it to 100MHz, but almost always limit the bandwith to 20MHz because I don't want to see the noise, and decent probe setup for that bandwith is too cumbersome to setup anyway for most measurements.

 

Offline james_s

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21611
  • Country: us
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #45 on: April 22, 2019, 10:50:44 pm »
That's a good point, it may make sense to recommend one of several popular hobbyist scopes and provide a bit of general scope information and instruct people to read the manual or consult a forum for specific details. Most scopes have roughly the same controls and work in the same way.
 

Offline David Cutcher CEGTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 41
  • Country: ca
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #46 on: April 23, 2019, 12:05:20 am »
This is exactly why I have requested input from the larger community.
The course will not be "plug & play." Not my style. Check out my text. [Electronic Circuits for the Evil Genius - McGraw-Hill 2010 2nd ed]
This course, like my book, is for the complete beginner. My expectation is that many have never used a multimeter before and that's where I start in lesson 2, right after inventory.  When they get to lesson 30 - we need the scope to visualize a NAND gate RC oscillator. It is simple enough to see using freeware scope and home made probe. But there are always those who want more. It's not standardized, but when I'm asked the question, I want to honestly recommend one item as an entry level scope.  Just like I'd recommend a quality entry level DMM for $30 usd, not a Fluke DMM.
It's my expectation is that they will use whatever is available, whether it has Sigrok compatibility or not. And if nothing is available, the freeware is an adequate introduction, even if it is limited to audio AC. It's all about concept.
David Cutcher "Certified Evil Genius"


 
 

Online rstofer

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9963
  • Country: us
Re: Best Oscilloscope for complete beginner?
« Reply #47 on: April 23, 2019, 01:20:40 am »
Perhaps write:

Appendix A - How To Use An Oscilloscope, A Short Introduction



Throughout the text just give hints for Time/div and Volts/div and perhaps trigger type and level.  Leave it to the student to peruse Appendix A and/or browse the Internet for tutorials.  All of human knowledge is on the Internet and Google knows where.

Or refer them to video series linked as a sticky at the top of this forum.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf