Brain Interface Computers Signal

[bdidds0831]

Hi there, I've got a question if somebody with more knowledge could help me out.

I’ve been reading about Brain Interface Computers where they place microchips inside humans to gather information and relay it back to the computer. If the signal created by the microchip was using secret frequency hopping sequences would you be able to detect the existence of a signal within that person? Using a scanner or frequency spectrum analyzer perhaps?

https://www.sciencefocus.com/news/the-injectable-nanosensor-that-will-one-day-read-your-thoughts/

"Once inside the brain they would act like a kind of antenna, turning neural activity into optical signals that could be wirelessly sent to an external device."

Thank you

[MK14]

You have apparently made 3 threads, and NEVER yet responded to any of them, as far as I can see.  Please respond to this message, to confirm you are a human.

[Manul]

If the signal created by the microchip was using secret frequency hopping sequences would you be able to detect the existence of a signal within that person?

Yes, absolutely. A signal is a signal, it signals. Ultra wideband might be more difficult to detect, but only if you don't know about it.

Not to mention all this is borderline science fictional. Brain interface is a very sofisticated tech which usually takes half of your desk. Implanted microchips with power supply and capability to send gathered information wirelessly? With secret frequency hopping? I bet no.

This brings me some vague memory of similar discutions. You may try searching the forum.

"Once inside the brain they would act like a kind of antenna, turning neural activity into optical signals that could be wirelessly sent to an external device."

Sorry, this sounds like BS.

[Benta]

Seems be some kind of QAnon bot.

[bdidds0831]

So sorry. I'll make sure to respond moving forward.

[radiolistener]

The human is not animal and should not be chipped like animal.

Let's not turn a human into a frankenstein by injecting implants into his body.
You can use high energy electromagnetic pulse in order to burn out electronic implant.

[Manul]

The human is not animal and should not be chipped like animal.

Let's not turn a human into a frankenstein by injecting implants into his body.
You can use high energy electromagnetic pulse in order to burn out electronic implant.

I think radiolistener is high this evening. That's ok, not really a problem.

[MK14]

Ironically, the 'state of mind', schizophrenia, came/comes to mind, when there seem to be people, worrying/believing in things like this thread.

So it becomes super ironic, that if you search for this topic, it seems to find the same OP (look at the name and numbers after it, then think about it).  Or it is just a big coincidence?

https://forum.schizophrenia.com/t/neurosensors/257421

They seem to be using the same words, as the OP.  Also, they seem to be owning up about their mental health situation and medications they are on.  Please see link.

[radiolistener]

Hi there, I've got a question if somebody with more knowledge could help me out.

I’ve been reading about Brain Interface Computers where they place microchips inside humans to gather information and relay it back to the computer. If the signal created by the microchip was using secret frequency hopping sequences would you be able to detect the existence of a signal within that person? Using a scanner or frequency spectrum analyzer perhaps?

https://www.sciencefocus.com/news/the-injectable-nanosensor-that-will-one-day-read-your-thoughts/

"Once inside the brain they would act like a kind of antenna, turning neural activity into optical signals that could be wirelessly sent to an external device."

talking seriously, you're talking about RF communication, which is established with some electronic implant. But as I understand, article which you're linked, talking about different thing. This is not electronic implant. This is some kind of nano-robots, which helps to scan your brain activity. This is something like eating radiocontrast agents before x-ray procedure.

It doesn't means that it allows to scan your thoughts, this is too complicated task and probably impossible with current technology. But technically it can allows to detect some thought patterns.

If you don't want to provide your brain activity for scanning, just avoid injection of such nano particles in your blood. 

[Manul]

Before I go to sleep...

First, the real red flag for direct mind control nano chips (if it ever happens) will be the dissapearance of widespread propaganda and advertisements on mass media. Just think about it, they would not waste money and time on that if they would have a better tool.

Second, if first is false and you think that you are a victim of some kind of limited attack targeted specifically at you, please remember that 99.999999% likely, you are not at all important to waste any such resources on you. You are important to the ones who love you and who knows you, but that is pretty much it in the world of 7 billion people.

This is reality, so just relax and enjoy your life and freedom. And don't read stupid propaganda on the media and fb and all the conspiracies. That's the real "brain control nano chip" of current days. It works and it f*cks the minds of millions of people worldwide every f*cking day.

[radiolistener]

yeah, there is no need for implants or nano-robots for mind control. For many peoples, mind control is already done with TV and social media

There is easy solution to avoid mind control. Just remember - there are ten commandments of God. When you faithfully keep the commandments of God, no one can control your mind. 

When someone tells you that you have duty, just remember that you have duty only to God, so make sure that what you are offered is consistent with God and your conscience.

[MK14]

...........Original contents removed, in the hope that, you might consider deleting your original message.  As it could be harmful to the OP......................

Please be careful when dealing with the original poster, and ideally don't make silly quick jokes, which may cause the OP, issues in real life.

To bdidds0831,

I very strongly suspect, that post, was a complete JOKE, and should/can readily be ignored, as false information.

As others, have already pointed out.  The item(s) described in the opening thread post.  Haven't really been invented yet, outside of any theoretical, or practical lab experiments at a University lab (I haven't read the paper, only very quickly skim read it).

Even if it existed (it almost certainly doesn't exist), it would only be used against very, very high priority targets.  Such as people who know big secrets about countries, such as Nuclear weapons, and other highly classified stuff.

It almost certainly WON'T WORK, because current technology and brain research.  Doesn't allow the reading of peoples actual thoughts/thinking, from brains.  Outside of some rather simplistic information, which could of probably be gleaned, just by reading the expressions on a persons face (body-language), anyway.

I suspect what is considerably more likely, is that your thinking process.  Is picking up on the WRONG information.  I.e. Is mistaken.

[Ed.Kloonk]

...........Original contents removed, in the hope that, you might consider deleting your original message.  As it could be harmful to the OP......................

Please be careful when dealing with the original poster, and ideally don't make silly quick jokes, which may cause the OP, issues in real life.

Post removed.

[MK14]

...........Original contents removed, in the hope that, you might consider deleting your original message.  As it could be harmful to the OP......................

Please be careful when dealing with the original poster, and ideally don't make silly quick jokes, which may cause the OP, issues in real life.

Post removed.

Thanks!

As I see it there were two possibilities.  One, it didn't matter.  But than no big deal. Or two it does matter to the OP.  So, I'm pleased you did the right thing.

[bdidds0831]

Hi, thank you for all the input. I just wanted to know the simple question of weather you would be able to detect the signal? Is there a tool or process in which you could scan for such signal?

I'm purely curious, that's all. Thank you for any input.

[MK14]

Hi, thank you for all the input. I just wanted to know the simple question of weather you would be able to detect the signal? Is there a tool or process in which you could scan for such signal?

I'm purely curious, that's all. Thank you for any input.

The best people (I strongly suspect), to deal with what you are describing (in the overall sense).  Would be appropriately trained/qualified medical personnel, such as mental health workers.  Who deal with complaints about brains.  Also, they can make sure that the right medications are being given, and being appropriately taken.

They could also look for any evidence or signs, that this is really happening, and work with you, on that.  They should be interested in discussing it, and can check out your claims (as they see, fit), and if necessary, improve your contact with such professionals, and review your medications.

[bdidds0831]

Thank you for your input. I'm only curious. Would such a signal be detectable? Yes or no?

[MK14]

Thank you for your input. I'm only curious. Would such a signal be detectable? Yes or no?

What do the Doctors say?

[bdidds0831]

Thank you. I'm merely curious that's all. But persay the technology did exist you'd be able to detect?

[bdidds0831]

Thanks for the input. I was merely curious of such a signal would be detectable? Yes or no? Thank you

[MK14]

You're beginning to sound and talk like a BOT.

[bdidds0831]

Thanks for the reply. That's not me. I was merely curious if such a signal could be detected? Yes or No? Much appreciated.

[bdidds0831]

Thanks for you input. Appreciate it. I'm only curious if such a signal would be detectable? Yes or No? Appreciate it.

[bdidds0831]

Thank you for your kind reply. I was merely curious if such a signal would be detectable? yes or no? Hypothetically speaking.

Thanks

[MK14]

These replies, seem to be the sort of patterns, that BOT software produces.

Tell me some other stuff, to help me decide, Yes or No, if you are a BOT.

What is 1 + 7 + a Banana?

[Bud]

It was confirmed by Hollywood long time ago such signals cannot be detected.

[Ed.Kloonk]

I'm a little spam bot, short and stout.

[radiolistener]

I was merely curious if such a signal would be detectable? yes or no? Hypothetically speaking.

If we're talking about electronic implant with RF communication channel, then yes - it can be detected.
But I'm afraid you won't be able to detect it when it remains in a sleep mode. It needs to establish a link with external transceiver in order to detect RF emission.

If we're talking about nano particles from article, then no, you can't detect it, because it doesn't have RF emission. But I suspect that using these particles for scanning brain activity is nothing more than a theory, I think today we're don't have technology which can be used for so easy remote scan of brain activity.

But there is already exists similar technology that allows to analyze the reaction of the brain, it is known as a lie detector and widely used for testing personnel for a secret services. It monitors different body activity in order to track on how people body responds to a specific questions. It allows to detect when people lie and when he saying a truth.

There is also exists a technique which allows to control people against their will. For example, it can be an injection of the so-called truth serum in order to get some information which people don't want to disclose. Or to trap a person in a catch by offering him a way out if he does what they want from him (intimidation). But such ways doesn't require electronic implants or injection of nano particles in the blood. This is just a psychology or exposure of the body to medications. The use of such methods without voluntary consent is illegal.
 

PS: your answers are really looks like AI bot, are you a human?

[bdidds0831]

I don't know. It was only a question. Thought it would be a simple answer. Was just thinking about future tech. And potential possibilities.

[bdidds0831]

Not a bot lol. I was only thinking about future technologies and if we could one day live in a world where someone could inject a person with this.

Only hypothetical. Simply curious if signal could be detected. Possibly find the parameters of detected FHSS signals. NO BOT haha

[bdidds0831]

No, I'm not a bot. I was only curious. So nanotechnology with antenna sending signal to external device wouldn't have any RF? How would it be relaying the information? Nothing to detect? Again, I'm only curious and I'm not a bot. Appreciate it.

[MrAl]

No, I'm not a bot. I was only curious. So nanotechnology with antenna sending signal to external device wouldn't have any RF? How would it be relaying the information? Nothing to detect? Again, I'm only curious and I'm not a bot. Appreciate it.

But you have not answered the question to prove that you are not a bot.

What is 1 + 7 + a banana?

If you cant answer that intelligently then we might assume you are a bot.

As to the topic itself, all i have seen so far is an implant that goes into the skull and into the brain so the user can communicate with a computer using just thought, and make an artificial limb move like a human limb.  It's wired though havent seen any wireless yet.

[Terry Bites]

"May one day" sounds like a journalists fantasy. It is currently science fantasy.
Interfacing our minds with machines at the level of though will most likely never happen- its on the same level of not happening as teleportation. (and over unity fusion power)
You can record potentials directly from the brain that correlate very well with basic stimuli and really well on motor intentions.
I've worked with EEG, MEG and implanted brain electrodes and they dont tell you much on the fine scale. FMRI can do better.

There is little (no) evidence that there are actual neural corelates of higher fuctions (like thoughts) are there to be measured.
Consciousnes experience cannot be properly defined so how could it be read!
Can you measure the story-line of a movie by probing inside a TV?
This is one of the most perplexing philosophical problems of our time. Still read Bernardo Kastrup on this.... prepare to be boggled.

The only thing that can read your mind is google! Change your privacy settings before you are assimilated.