Author Topic: Celltower Power Supply  (Read 1343 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LaserTazerPhaserTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 203
  • Country: us
Celltower Power Supply
« on: September 06, 2019, 06:02:03 pm »
Whats the typical working voltage of  power amp stages in typical urban celltowers along with the type of supply used for turning mains into DC?
« Last Edit: September 06, 2019, 06:05:06 pm by LaserTazerPhaser »
 

Offline ArthurDent

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1193
  • Country: us
Re: Celltower Power Supply
« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2019, 07:23:23 pm »
I'm at a total loss as to why just anyone would need, or want, to know that information. Perhaps giving us a little more information of what you are trying to do might help.
 

Offline MagicSmoker

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1408
  • Country: us
Re: Celltower Power Supply
« Reply #2 on: September 07, 2019, 07:34:46 pm »
Many cell sites use -48V, same as POTS (Plain Old Telephone Service). This is both because the MOSFETs in many RF PAs (power amplifiers) are designed for 48V operation, and telephone ESS (electronic switching systems) have traditionally been designed for 48V as well.

 

Offline TheHolyHorse

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 179
  • Country: se
  • You don't need to be confused, just understand it.
Re: Celltower Power Supply
« Reply #3 on: September 08, 2019, 10:29:39 am »
I'm at a total loss as to why just anyone would need, or want, to know that information. Perhaps giving us a little more information of what you are trying to do might help.

Maybe he's building his own cell tower, because why not  :P
 

Offline LaserTazerPhaserTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 203
  • Country: us
Re: Celltower Power Supply
« Reply #4 on: September 13, 2019, 05:33:47 am »
Was considering they might have used swiching regulators to step down the voltage or cap droppers to power the amps.

Are the amps cooled with forced convection or do they simply run the power semis well below their derating values?
 

Offline MagicSmoker

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1408
  • Country: us
Re: Celltower Power Supply
« Reply #5 on: September 13, 2019, 04:33:06 pm »
Transformerless (aka "capacitive dropper") power supplies are never used to supply more than a few watts of power, and even then they rarely cost less (or take up less volume) than a competently designed flyback.

Telecom power supplies are designed for very high reliability and efficiency, with upfront cost almost not even a consideration. The most common topology I've seen is a boost PFC front end either feeding a phase-shifted full bridge (for >500W) or an LLC half-bridge (<600W, yes, some overlap there). Cooling depends on the power level, obviously, but typically forced convection is used starting at relatively low power levels (say, 300W) because telecom supplies are often crammed together in a 19" rack so don't have a lot of means of shedding heat via radiation or natural convection.
« Last Edit: September 13, 2019, 04:35:04 pm by MagicSmoker »
 

Offline dmills

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2093
  • Country: gb
Re: Celltower Power Supply
« Reply #6 on: September 14, 2019, 02:00:49 am »
Also, telecom companies are WELL aware of what heat does to system reliability...

Power is actually one of the major operating expenses for a cell network so they quite regularly upgrade their supplies to score an extra point or two on the efficiency of the mains supplies, which is nice because it means a steady stream of really excellent quality 48V power supplies hit the surplus market for basically no money.

The Ham radio LDMOS fraternity thanks them for this (ADSL interference on SW, not so much)!

 

Offline MagicSmoker

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1408
  • Country: us
Re: Celltower Power Supply
« Reply #7 on: September 14, 2019, 04:44:11 pm »
LDMOS FETs, mainly because they are far more rugged (read: tolerant of load mismatch) than BJTs; almost as rugged as vacuum tubes, actually. Good linearity and much easier impedance matching (can often be done with just transmission line transformers rather than complex - and narrowband - conjugate matching networks) are also huge advantages. In fact, I haven't seen a commercial BJT-based RF PA in decades...

 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf