I understand where you're coming from and yes, the environment around a car car be hazardous. However, it is fairly common in the initial community I'm developing this for to use cheaper sensors than what I've listed. As the stock vehicles have 8-bit AD for the sensors that range from 2 bar to 3 bar MAP (manifold absolute pressure), they sometimes need to be swapped out with ones of a greater range. A common one that is used with high reliability is the MPXH6400A. The stock sensors are
basically these guys from Bosch.
In fact, I have one in my ECU as we speak and almost used it in the project. As there are no pinhole leaks, of gaps or not-completely-tight fittings when these upgrade are done correctly, there is no gas escaping from near the sensor so there isn't much of a possibility for hazardous material to migrate from the charge pipes to the sensor itself, especially since they are mounted at a higher point in the vehicle. If the end user of the gauge improperly installs it, then it will die. However, the user base this is going towards doesn't have that typical problem.
My initial community this is being developed for is the Volkswagen/Audi TDI, or turbo diesel, group. When these cars are modified, there is demand for high quality monitoring equipment. Some, but not most, will swap out the ECU in order to have a higher refresh rate, about 2.5-3.5 to 8+ samp/sec, when monitoring parameters via the OBD port, and also gain the ability to flash the ECU via the OBD port. What I'm building is DAQ that can log an order of magnitude faster, has greater precision, and can maintain that speed and precision upon all devices attached, which there are 6 common parameters are needed, but modular expansion puts this out to a total of 14 parameters.
Methinks I should have put this in the projects section at this point...
Long story short, The first sensor has one downside of it's cost and the second has the need for additional circuity and enlarges the profile of the final device.