Author Topic: Underating Supercap charging to avoid balancing problem?  (Read 579 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline fc3000Topic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 66
  • Country: gb
Underating Supercap charging to avoid balancing problem?
« on: January 13, 2022, 10:24:24 am »
Hi all,
I was exploring the use of supercapacitors for future projects.  So I come up with this thought.

Say i have two supercapacitors rated at 17F@5V.
I am aware that if you connect them in series they need to be balanced, to compensate for the tolerance.
If i  connect them in series, and charge them to only 8V, will this resolves the problem of balancing them?
This, of course, will result in lower capacitance. Is the new capacitance 20% less than before, since the voltage is 20% less?
Thanks in advance.

Regards
Technology is Magic Made real.   (Elon Musk)
 

Offline Gyro

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9924
  • Country: gb
Re: Underating Supercap charging to avoid balancing problem?
« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2022, 10:40:39 am »
Hi,

No, the capacitance will halve (the resulting value of series capacitors is not related to voltage).

You need to use some form of charge balancing to ensure that neither capacitor exceeds 5V - their leakage may not be identical so they may not share voltage equally. In the simplest form, this might be in the form of a pair of 4V7 Zeners, but that's a bit primitive.
Best Regards, Chris
 
The following users thanked this post: fc3000

Online Siwastaja

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8760
  • Country: fi
Re: Underating Supercap charging to avoid balancing problem?
« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2022, 10:49:40 am »
If the difference was only in different capacitance, voltage derating would indeed solve the balancing problem. The smaller capacitor would fill up faster, so if you rated your max voltage so that when Vsmaller = 5V, then Vbigger = say 4V, and Vtotal would be at 9V.

But, balancing is also needed to account for different leakage currents. Think about it, if one of the capacitor discharges on its own faster than its buddy, the one who discharges less sees larger part of the total voltage as you keep charging the series.

Classic options are,
Parallel resistors: the idea is to simply increase the leakage of both capacitors significantly enough so that the original (smaller) leakage current becomes only a tiny part of the new, higher leakage current; explicit resistors dominate and form a voltage divider. Obvious drawback is, these resistors consume current all the time, discharging the capacitors. Good for very short storage periods only.

Zener diodes / series diodes / etc. These devices have, unlike resistors, exponential current rise as a function of applied voltage. They are pretty good at preventing exceeding the maximums, but they are still not on-off devices (just exponential), meaning they discharge the capacitors significantly near their clamping voltage. Also, the voltage curve of zeners / diodes is highly temperature dependent.

Active circuit. Now, with a voltage reference + comparator, you can build a circuit which behaver pretty much like "ideal zener": below threshold, leakage/quiescent current can be tiny enough not to matter, and above threshold, they can shunt significant current. Classic and simple implementation, see TL431.
« Last Edit: January 13, 2022, 10:52:15 am by Siwastaja »
 
The following users thanked this post: fc3000

Offline fc3000Topic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 66
  • Country: gb
Re: Underating Supercap charging to avoid balancing problem?
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2022, 12:07:22 pm »
Thank you very much for the info.
Learning all the time!

Regards
Technology is Magic Made real.   (Elon Musk)
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf