Author Topic: AM transmitter  (Read 27155 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline interothTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 35
  • Country: gb
  • Programmer gone electronics novice
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #25 on: July 07, 2012, 05:22:32 pm »
United Kingdom
I will add it to my profile, strange it did not show up.
 

Offline Simon

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 18022
  • Country: gb
  • Did that just blow up? No? might work after all !!
    • Simon's Electronics
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #26 on: July 07, 2012, 05:27:05 pm »
then I would use the same frequency as radio control toys sold here and use low power or try one of the am frequencies on LOW power not that I know what the regulations are in the UK on non licenced transmission
 

Offline interothTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 35
  • Country: gb
  • Programmer gone electronics novice
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #27 on: July 07, 2012, 05:50:39 pm »
After looking up the UK regulations, it looks like I will have to use 27Mhz. How much voltage should I use for the antenna for only low power? My current design calls for 9V but I think that is a bit much.
 

Offline SeanB

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16362
  • Country: za
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #28 on: July 07, 2012, 06:00:16 pm »
It is not really a voltage thing, but the power you put in. Try to limit the power to under 10mW and you will not realy have much range on it, and a simple wire antenna will be inefficient in most cases.

If you get the matching right and the antenna right then 50mw is enough to communicate around the planet in the right circumstances.
 

Offline interothTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 35
  • Country: gb
  • Programmer gone electronics novice
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #29 on: July 07, 2012, 06:03:53 pm »
Would a 750 Ohm resistor in series with the antenna be enough to limit it to 10mW?
 

Offline G7PSK

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3865
  • Country: gb
  • It is hot until proved not.
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #30 on: July 07, 2012, 06:14:41 pm »
Model control is 26.960 to 27.280  at 1.5 watt max.according to the list that I have, there is also 27.450 which is emergency alarm at no more than 0.5 watt. Putting a resistor in line with the antennae will not limit the power we are talking RF here.You need to limit the power generated by your circuit. I would use a 50 ohm resistance across the out put of the transmitter as the antennae that will in all likely hood do for short range work.   
« Last Edit: July 07, 2012, 06:21:54 pm by G7PSK »
 

Offline interothTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 35
  • Country: gb
  • Programmer gone electronics novice
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #31 on: July 07, 2012, 06:37:24 pm »
So will a Colpitts oscillator be accurate enough or will I need a crystal oscillator? If so do you know any good crystal oscillator designs?
 

Offline G7PSK

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3865
  • Country: gb
  • It is hot until proved not.
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #32 on: July 07, 2012, 08:52:08 pm »
You can crystal control a colpitts.
 

Offline interothTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 35
  • Country: gb
  • Programmer gone electronics novice
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #33 on: July 07, 2012, 09:37:13 pm »
How would you use a crystal oscillator in a Colpitts oscillator? I have never used a crystal oscillator before.
 

Offline G7PSK

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3865
  • Country: gb
  • It is hot until proved not.
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #34 on: July 08, 2012, 03:25:14 pm »
Like this.
 

Offline interothTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 35
  • Country: gb
  • Programmer gone electronics novice
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #35 on: July 08, 2012, 07:33:28 pm »
Thanks, but the diagram you gave me only goes up to 10MHz, how would I get it to 27?
 

Offline G7PSK

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3865
  • Country: gb
  • It is hot until proved not.
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #36 on: July 08, 2012, 08:07:35 pm »
You could use a multiplier circuit or re-calculate the circuit shown and change the crystal but you could well be better of using a chip like the NE602
 

Offline interothTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 35
  • Country: gb
  • Programmer gone electronics novice
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #37 on: July 10, 2012, 12:15:40 am »
After looking around it looks like it will be best to use a pre existing design instead of try to use a half baked idea based on little knowledge of wireless electronics.
It looks like I will be using the circuit here.


One thing I want to ask is how would I change the circuit to flip a relay instead of reversing a motor?
Also what would I have to search on sites like Farnel or RS for those inductors? I can not find them.
« Last Edit: July 10, 2012, 12:21:17 am by interoth »
 

Offline dda

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 46
  • Country: au
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #38 on: July 10, 2012, 01:04:29 am »
The inductors he used are hand wound. Look at the photos. But im sure you can find 33uH most places... Im not sure what the deal with the variable one is, is it referred to in the text somewhere?

Also,

Quote
CONNECTING A RELAY
Fig: 5 shows how a relay can be connected to the driver transistor to operate when the transmitter is switched on. The change-over contacts on the relay can be used to power any device when the transmitter is off or when it is on.
 

Offline interothTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 35
  • Country: gb
  • Programmer gone electronics novice
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #39 on: July 11, 2012, 06:08:17 pm »
After looking for the design I can still not find details on the inductors on the design on this page.
Both the transmitter and receiver have inductors that are 'measured' by number of turns. I am looking to use stock parts so I would need to know the inductance.
Transmitter

Receiver


What should I use for the unmarked inductors? Would a stock inductor do?
 

Offline RCMR

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 405
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #40 on: July 11, 2012, 07:44:07 pm »
Some of those inductors will need to be "tuned" in order for the system to work.

Just buy some coil formers and wind your own -- cheap, easy and very effective.
 

Offline interothTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 35
  • Country: gb
  • Programmer gone electronics novice
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #41 on: July 14, 2012, 12:48:28 am »
For this design I am looking to use stock items that I can get in large numbers, so I want to know what inductance to use.

Is it even possible to use stock inductors for those inductors?
Thanks
 

Offline vk3yedotcom

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 613
  • Country: au
    • vk3ye dot com (radio articles and projects)
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #42 on: July 14, 2012, 03:23:02 am »
Is it even possible to use stock inductors for those inductors?

I've had success with 1uH RF chokes for the 27 - 40 MHz region in oscillator collector circuits.  These would resonate with a trimmer in the few tens of pF.  For a secondary wrap 2 or 3 turns of enamelled copper wire around it.  Altronics and Jaycar sell them, with the former much cheaper.

The inductance values for the pi network on the output will need to be much lower than 1uH. As a rule of thumb, 1uH and about 440pF is good for 7 MHz, so for 27 - 30 MHz then 0.22-0.25 uH would be OK.  Something on a T37-6 toriod would be OK but to cut costs it should be possible to make something from enamelled wire wound on a 5 - 10mm former.  Here's where a low value inductance meter will be handy.  Low value slug tuned coils sometimes come up in the Rockby mailer and may be OK.

In relation to RF transistors, a 2N2222A (especially the metal can version), is OK up to 50 MHz and puts out a bit more than the BC548.  I think Talking Electronics favour the 2N3563 for small signal VHF stuff over the BC548 - this would also be fine for low power. You see overseas circuits try to push a lot out of a 2N2222A but be safe and run them at maybe 20 - 30mW or so only. 

I've found that a garden variety LM386 audio amp works well as an AM modulator for transmitters up to about a half watt.   Use the standard circuit but without the coupling capacitor between Pin 5 and the speaker.  Instead put in (say) a 10 ohm resistor (this protects the LM386 as a near short will blow it up).

You'll need a crystal oscillator and one or two RF amp stages to get the RF up to a few hundred milliwatts (if that's your aim).  Instead of connecting the last stage to the positive rail (probably via an RF choke), connect it to the free end of the 10 ohm resistor from the LM386.  Then maybe a 0.1uF from there to shunt RF to ground.  You'll then have an AM transmitter.

As to its legality, rules vary between countries.  Here in Australia we have a 'Low Interference Potential Device Class Licence' (look it up on acma.gov.au ). It basically says that you can use low power on a generous selection of frequencies without needing to take out a licence.  Conditions are that you mustn't interfere with anyone and must accept interference from other users.

Permitted power outputs vary with frequencies.  They're very often 100 mW (plenty of power to have lots of fun with a 1 - 5km range)  but there's some (including around 27 MHz) where you can run 1 watt.  I like around 36.864 MHz as you can double 18.432 MHz crystals and there's less interference than 27 MHz.  Other countries may have 'short range device' provisions or similar.

The cheapest way to start experimenting is to buy a set of toy walkie talkies for $6-7.  These are often AM with super-regenerative receivers.  Maybe get 2 sets, so you have one good receiver, one good transmitter (to use as a reference) and then there's two left over to pull apart or modify.

Peter
« Last Edit: July 14, 2012, 03:48:57 am by vk3yedotcom »
NEW! Ham Radio Get Started: Your success in amateur radio. One of 8 ebooks available on amateur radio topics. Details at  https://books.vk3ye.com
 

Offline G7OVK

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 6
  • Country: gb
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #43 on: July 26, 2012, 05:13:15 pm »
Designing your own rf circuits with next to no experience of rf is not the way to proceed. As mentioned, the best suggestion is to play around with designs already published that are known to work. Build up some exerience that way. RF can be good fun, but it can be hard-core analogue and not really something to be starting out with. When building the circuits to experiment with, dont use breadboard. Breadboard is terrible for most rf work with stray capacitances and inductances everywhere. Best way is to build on copper clad board - you can use a large piece of copper clad board for the ground and glue small square copper clad board pieces for component connections. Keep all leads as short as possible.

I don't think there will be any complaints from anyone (authorites or neighbours) from interference. As long as the circuits are well built, suitable frequencies are chosen and only a few milliwatts are output, I doubt anything bad will happen. In most cases, the signal will be weak and shouldn't attract anyone's attention of more than a few metres at the most. I also wouldn't touch anything LC based above around 10 MHz. Just stick with crystals - at least you won't have any drift worries.
 

Offline G7OVK

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 6
  • Country: gb
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #44 on: July 26, 2012, 05:18:46 pm »
Forgot to mention also, don't use anything in the MW broadcast band. I'm not sure who said the AM broadcast bands are seldom used in the UK? They are still very much in use, although I agree most people now listen on FM or via DAB. Biggest problem is the interference you will suffer, especially at night when further afield stations will come in, some of them running hundreds of thousands of watts. You don't exactly want your garage door to suddenly open itself due to DX coming in triggering the receiver!!
 

Offline T4P

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3697
  • Country: sg
    • T4P
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #45 on: July 26, 2012, 05:49:49 pm »
Forgot to mention also, don't use anything in the MW broadcast band. I'm not sure who said the AM broadcast bands are seldom used in the UK? They are still very much in use, although I agree most people now listen on FM or via DAB. Biggest problem is the interference you will suffer, especially at night when further afield stations will come in, some of them running hundreds of thousands of watts. You don't exactly want your garage door to suddenly open itself due to DX coming in triggering the receiver!!

DX?
 

Offline G7OVK

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 6
  • Country: gb
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #46 on: July 26, 2012, 06:40:20 pm »
Forgot to mention also, don't use anything in the MW broadcast band. I'm not sure who said the AM broadcast bands are seldom used in the UK? They are still very much in use, although I agree most people now listen on FM or via DAB. Biggest problem is the interference you will suffer, especially at night when further afield stations will come in, some of them running hundreds of thousands of watts. You don't exactly want your garage door to suddenly open itself due to DX coming in triggering the receiver!!

DX?

DX = Long Distance.
Don't want a system that works when the frequency is clear but then fails when a long distance signal suddenly comes in as the day turns into night.
 

Offline SeanB

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16362
  • Country: za
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #47 on: July 26, 2012, 06:51:31 pm »
Don't think that DX is only a MW problem, it affects FM and higher as well.

I used to listen to Capital Radio on 604kHz ( the SA version not the UK one) at nights, as otherwise I was in the daytime skip zone. Evening and the signal would arrive out of the noise as it got darker.
 

Offline G7OVK

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 6
  • Country: gb
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #48 on: July 26, 2012, 09:19:53 pm »
Don't think that DX is only a MW problem, it affects FM and higher as well.

I used to listen to Capital Radio on 604kHz ( the SA version not the UK one) at nights, as otherwise I was in the daytime skip zone. Evening and the signal would arrive out of the noise as it got darker.

You are right. It can affect all frequencies. The lower frequencies are affected the most, more frequently. I personally wouldn't put any kind of remote control system on any broadcast band anyway, despite any skip issues, and definitely not in the MW or SW broadcast bands. I'd also not be relying on a remote system that could be triggered by a carrier. It would have to have some sort of access control, even as simple as a single tone that could be decoded by a tone decoder, or a DTMF system as a minimum.
 

Offline asbokid

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 57
  • Country: gb
Re: AM transmitter
« Reply #49 on: July 26, 2012, 09:45:57 pm »
Forgot to mention also, don't use anything in the MW broadcast band. I'm not sure who said the AM broadcast bands are seldom used in the UK? They are still very much in use, although I agree most people now listen on FM or via DAB. Biggest problem is the interference you will suffer, especially at night when further afield stations will come in, some of them running hundreds of thousands of watts. You don't exactly want your garage door to suddenly open itself due to DX coming in triggering the receiver!!

AM RF ingress causes loads of problems to xDSL services, currently up to 17MHz (G.993.2 Profile 17a) in the UK.

The QLN (Quiet Line Noise) dataset of a Broadcom-chipset modem can illustrate the problem. There is fun to be had geo-locating a broadband subscriber, based only on his QLN profile  :)



 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf