Author Topic: RF attenuation circuit  (Read 3123 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Yuri1737Topic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 4
RF attenuation circuit
« on: December 24, 2014, 10:22:38 pm »
Hi,
Im trying to make a digitally selectable RF attenuator.
First question do I need a RF balun to convert differential RF signal to single ended or a capacitor will be enough. Can i use as a balun RF transformer such as http://www.coilcraft.com/ja4220.cfm?
Second question i found a simple circuit shown on a picture bellow - signal path containing an attenuator which can be bypass using a relay will this circuit work for low signals or will it disturb the waveform? I think i should terminate the relay connection with 50 Ohm when it is not used.
 

Offline rs20

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2322
  • Country: au
Re: RF attenuation circuit
« Reply #1 on: December 25, 2014, 12:04:11 am »
Please say what bandwidth you're aiming for.

That aside, the shield of the cable is typically connected to ground; in that case, a simple capacitor is sufficient. I only see baluns in use in connection with mixers and so on, where it's sorta kinda part of the mixing process maybe. But I'm clearly not an expert.
 

Offline aveekbh

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 62
  • Country: in
Re: RF attenuation circuit
« Reply #2 on: December 25, 2014, 06:09:41 am »
If you're using a balanced RF line (I can only think of twin-lead as an example) instead of the more common coax, then you will need a balun on either side of the attenuator. Of course, balanced attenuator topologies exist as well - http://www.rfcafe.com/references/electrical/attenuators.htm.

In the circuit that you have shown, I presume the "resistors" are actually attenuators. In general, you cannot use relays of this nature - the open end of the relays are stubs, and they will affect the impedance. Instead, you need to use SPDT switches (one on each end of the attenuators) to send the signal through the attenuator or the bypass line.

Hope this makes sense.  :)
 

Offline Yuri1737Topic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 4
Re: RF attenuation circuit
« Reply #3 on: December 25, 2014, 11:01:36 am »
About the attenuators circuit will the circuit from picture below work? Im not quite sure if the 50 Ohm terminator near 20dB attenuator wont affect the circuit.
 

Offline aveekbh

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 62
  • Country: in
Re: RF attenuation circuit
« Reply #4 on: December 25, 2014, 02:34:17 pm »
How are the junctions realised (near the 10 and 20 dB attenuators)? You cannot connect them like normal wires, you need RF splitters of the correct impedance or SPDT switches which will either engage the attenuator or the bypass.
 

Offline Marco

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7545
  • Country: nl
Re: RF attenuation circuit
« Reply #5 on: December 25, 2014, 02:59:53 pm »
Please say what bandwidth you're aiming for.

And linearity and dynamic range.
 

Offline Marco

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7545
  • Country: nl
Re: RF attenuation circuit
« Reply #6 on: December 25, 2014, 03:18:01 pm »
About the attenuators circuit will the circuit from picture below work? Im not quite sure if the 50 Ohm terminator near 20dB attenuator wont affect the circuit.

Don't the input and output have to be impedance matched?

Can't you just use a digital VGA?

« Last Edit: December 25, 2014, 03:41:32 pm by Marco »
 

Offline Neganur

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1185
  • Country: fi
Re: RF attenuation circuit
« Reply #7 on: December 26, 2014, 10:00:56 pm »
I'm a bit puzzled why you start using AD's SPDT 1GHz switches instead of looking at digitally selectable attenuators (VGAs) from Analog, Macom, Perigrine, Mini Circuits etc. There's a bunch of them with differential inputs too. Unless it exceeds your power or bandwidth, in which case the switches might not be good either.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf