A generic 6 puff cap.
+1
I repaired a garage door remote recently with a couple of these in the RF output. They're quite small ~5mm dia and they were used for output resonance paralleled with a tiny variable cap. The RF output had drifted slightly off frequency but having a 3.2 GHz demo SA it was easy to get in band again at which it worked better than ever before.
What would be the process if you didn't have one of those? Just curious, I'm not working with any remotes (was just trying to identify the cap, and thanks to everyone, it's done).
I first thought the remote's 339 MHz would make it possible to get some measurement from my 300 MHz DSO and go from there but with the additional info on the carrier there was no useful info gained from just a BNC/coax sniffer loop. I couldn't get accurate frequency measurements. I might have tried the scope's FFT but didn't instead just grabbing a SA.
RF is black magic and not a strong point of mine so just working with what I have.........and a frequency counter might have done the job......a SA will show the peak fundamental frequency and I was able to trim it onto the band with the tiny variable cap added for just this purpose. Same BNC/coax sniffer loop used.
As what is the normal/standard procedure......well it must be transmitting *near* the middle of the intended frequency and it wasn't which this explained this remotes poor performance for some years.......nudging closer and closer to the garage door in order to get within range and then having to roll backwards to give the tilting door room to open.
Now it works from 20+ meters.
Lately it was so bad that you'd have to hold the remote close to the passenger seat upright to get the steel mesh inside to act as a RF reflective backplane to direct the RF better towards the receiver.
Luckily I had another *working* remote (wife's) so could see that signal amplitude was comparable between them so it had to be an off band issue.
Others with more experience will have better ideas.