I still don't understand if "0 ohm" and superconducting are being used here as a joke or not. I also seem to think that the word series and parallel were mixed up in the original post. But in any case:
Thermistors are often used as quench protection triggers in superconducting power circuits. In this application (it's used all over the place at the LHC at CERN and presumably other places with intentionally- and accidentally-quenching circuits), it's used to provide a more sensitive readout for quench protection hardware. This arrangement allows for just enough of a faster readout for voltage monitoring equipment to react to an oncoming superconducting magnet quench. If you are monitoring the superconductor's resistance directly (or the voltage drop across it), it's basically impossible to react fast enough to stop an impending quench. But if you use an NTC device and monitor its resistance/voltage drop, you will get a warning signal readout just fast enough to intentionally force the quench on the superconducting link in question (and usually some nearby links, to cut off the quench from cascading).
If this is all a joke, then I'm with Richard.