I read that
"vacuum tube current is limited by space charge"
I understand that an electron cloud forms on the cathode but is space charge the effect of the electron cloud that is near the cathode repelling back the electrons emitted from the cathode?
How then do high current vacuum tubes mitigate this effect?
Big fucking cathodes.
Have you read the numbers being thrown about in this thread? Cathodes requiring 10s of kW have been mentioned. That's a lot of white-hot tungsten!
What kind of heat losses is one looking at in vacuum tubes. If a tube is rated for 100kW, how much % of that would be wasted in heat?
Plate rating is plate rating. Total input and output are whatever. They can be higher (efficiency > 50% say for class C amps).
I've figured that a typical 30W sweep tube in class D can deliver 100-200W output, per tube. Downside is, class D is very rough on the screen grid, which is typically rated for 3-5W for these types, but this service often dissipates >5W (depending on how carefully you've designed the inverter and its drive circuitry).
Still a far sight from the 90%+ of a MOSFET class D amp, but not bad considering.
They're still surprisingly competitive in terms of overall ratings -- it used to be a sweep tube (or the various other types: radar modulators, thyratrons, etc.) was about the only single device that could switch 5kV+ and nearly an ampere. Now that 4.5kV 2.5A+ MOSFETs are cheap* and readily available, they really aren't good for much at all.
*I mean, they're like $20-30 each, but NOS sweep tubes are fairly in demand, easily running $60 each. So, relatively speaking... not to mention all the savings from no screen or heater supply, and the lower drive voltages, of course.
Tim