Hi, it is essential to understand how the spectrum analyser works and what the trace is displaying to make sense of what is on the screen. You have seen W2AEW's video which does a good job of describing what the instrument does so that should give you a clue as to why your readings are different (hint RBW has nothing to do with the bandwidth of signal you can display). By default, the trace displays the average power contained within the current RBW window and that is the level displayed. It should be clear if you think about this for a second that the trace isn't therefore giving you a detailed 'level' indication at each spot frequency, but a smeared out average of everything it can 'see'. To get a more accurate representation of the actual signal you would reduce the RBW to narrow down the window which gives less averaging for each spot frequency, in fact to get the actual level would require an infinitely small RBW but in reality this isn't possible and the error with a realistic RBW is usually good enough. The reason you have variable RBW by the way is for speed. Narrow filters are slow to respond so wide ones are used when scan speed is required (try running a 1GHz span at 10Hz RBW and you will see). Depending on what you are trying to measure, there are other types of detector available like peak, minimum etc to get round the resolution problem, you need to know the instrument and the measurement you are trying to make otherwise it will fool you. The Rigol actually has reasonable help screens which give a description of the various functions which are ok for getting an idea of what the settings are for and it's well worth spending a bit of time to explore them.