2. Eliminate all of the people saying thank you to someone else and you've lost about a quarter of the content. By the end all the mutual thank you´s and back slapping got a little too much and I fast forwarded through some of it.
A lot of the content is there more as a historical record of the event for the people who were there or couldn't make it. It wasn't supposed to be for a mainstream audience. It was primarily an event and reunion for those involved, so of course they are going to be thanking lots of people.
I was there for the 4 day event, had my camera, so thought I might as well capture the actual talks.
3. The mention at the start of some of the speeches of the Aboriginal people seemed strange, out of place and (maybe) a little scripted. Looking at the photographs I am reasonably sure that none of the native Australians played a part in the events of fifty years ago although I am willing to be corrected here. Is this just more political correctness creeping in or is there an 'Australian' reason for mentioning the Aboriginal people multiple times?
It's common practice at formal events nowadays, even big sports events etc to recognise the traditional custodians of the land you are on.
I went to the whale show at San Diego Sea World once and had to sit through a recognition of service men and women, so I guess we aren't that bad yet.
4. The video quality could have been better, especially when diagrams were shown on the screen.
Only way to get better is to have a dual camera system or get the original slides from the people and do a crap ton of editing. No thanks, not for non-mainstream talks.
5. The guy who turned up in the replica Apollo era space suit deserves a prize, well done that man
Yes, I think he was the curator at the Questacon museum.