Author Topic: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car  (Read 20338 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Bud

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6877
  • Country: ca
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #25 on: June 27, 2022, 02:30:44 am »
I'd be more concerned about crash safety. Zillion of glass pieces coming at you , thank you very much....
Facebook-free life and Rigol-free shack.
 

Offline golden_labels

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1182
  • Country: pl
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #26 on: June 27, 2022, 03:12:00 am »
I'd be more concerned about crash safety. Zillion of glass pieces coming at you , thank you very much....
There is a thing called laminated glass. Used in cars for quite some time.
People imagine AI as T1000. What we got so far is glorified T9.
 
The following users thanked this post: JPortici

Online Bud

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6877
  • Country: ca
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #27 on: June 27, 2022, 05:51:20 am »
Is it used in solar panels though?
Facebook-free life and Rigol-free shack.
 

Offline ataradov

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11228
  • Country: us
    • Personal site
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #28 on: June 27, 2022, 05:55:12 am »
Given that they are form fitted, I assume you could order them in whatever configuration you want.

My concern was not so much with constant damage, but more with one off events when you get hit by a rock from the ahead or something like this. Even with plain glass it is annoying. But I guess if you have money for $250K car, you are not worried about such things.
Alex
 

Online McBryce

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2681
  • Country: de
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #29 on: June 27, 2022, 11:02:32 am »
If you removed all the additional weight that the panels / DC/DC Converter and extra cabling create you would probably increase the range by the same amount that the panels claim to give you.

McBryce.
30 Years making cars more difficult to repair.
 

Online coppice

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8605
  • Country: gb
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #30 on: June 27, 2022, 01:07:35 pm »
I'd be more concerned about crash safety. Zillion of glass pieces coming at you , thank you very much....
There is a thing called laminated glass. Used in cars for quite some time.
While laminated glass exists, works really well, and is pretty stable over a long lifetime, it is rarely used for anything but windscreens in cars, because of cost. Only a very few makers use laminated glass for their panoramic roof panels, for example - basically only the ones with a long term image for safety, like Volvo. On the other hand, most of the glass panels in cars are not as dangerous as a typical window breaking, as they are made from tempered glass - nasty, but not usually lethal.
 

Offline SiliconWizard

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 14297
  • Country: fr
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #31 on: June 27, 2022, 06:42:43 pm »
Given that they are form fitted, I assume you could order them in whatever configuration you want.

My concern was not so much with constant damage, but more with one off events when you get hit by a rock from the ahead or something like this. Even with plain glass it is annoying. But I guess if you have money for $250K car, you are not worried about such things.

This is a ridiculous amount of money for such a car.
$250k cars are usually the luxury/sports car that have and keep a very high value for decades. They are not just cars, but a safe investment. This? Who really thinks it will even sell at 1/4 of its price 5 years later? That is, if the company still even exists? :palm:
 

Online nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26751
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #32 on: June 27, 2022, 11:16:43 pm »
Given that they are form fitted, I assume you could order them in whatever configuration you want.

My concern was not so much with constant damage, but more with one off events when you get hit by a rock from the ahead or something like this. Even with plain glass it is annoying. But I guess if you have money for $250K car, you are not worried about such things.

This is a ridiculous amount of money for such a car.
$250k cars are usually the luxury/sports car that have and keep a very high value for decades. They are not just cars, but a safe investment. This? Who really thinks it will even sell at 1/4 of its price 5 years later? That is, if the company still even exists? :palm:
People also buy $250k hand bags so...
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 

Offline cortex_m0

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 114
  • Country: us
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #33 on: June 28, 2022, 11:55:48 pm »
One of the automotive YouTube channels got a brief test drive of a Lightyear Zero prototype in Spain. It seems like the solar does generate meaningful power, and it continues to generate while in motion. On a perfect sunny day the solar wouldn't do much to extend a road trip, but even so the Lightyear Zero, per their specification, claims to be roughly 90% more efficient than a Nissan Leaf at 70 mph (110 kph). 6.5 miles (10.5km) per kWh for the Lightyear vs. 3.4 miles (5.4km) per kwh for the 2020 Nissan Leaf Plus, with a similar capacity battery.

Video posted earlier this week by Out of Spec Reviews:
 

Online coppice

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8605
  • Country: gb
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #34 on: June 29, 2022, 10:31:41 am »
One of the automotive YouTube channels got a brief test drive of a Lightyear Zero prototype in Spain. It seems like the solar does generate meaningful power, and it continues to generate while in motion. On a perfect sunny day the solar wouldn't do much to extend a road trip, but even so the Lightyear Zero, per their specification, claims to be roughly 90% more efficient than a Nissan Leaf at 70 mph (110 kph). 6.5 miles (10.5km) per kWh for the Lightyear vs. 3.4 miles (5.4km) per kwh for the 2020 Nissan Leaf Plus, with a similar capacity battery.

Video posted earlier this week by Out of Spec Reviews:

He thinks its refreshing that this company wants to talk about highway speeds, but of course they do. That plays to the strengths of their design. What happens when he tries twisty roads, and other complexity, where the handling is paramount? Various people have tried motors in each wheel, and are defeated by the awful handling with a large unsprung mass. When he talks about the light wheels and special tyres compensating somewhat for the weight of the motors, that's just another way of saying the put less rubber on the road to compensate for inherent poor handling.

It looks like there are some interesting things in the design, especially its drag coefficient. Perhaps leaving out the gimmicky solar panels might have made people focus more on those.
 

Online Marco

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6693
  • Country: nl
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #35 on: June 29, 2022, 03:25:34 pm »
How well versed were those people in creating correction algorithms for the power steering?
 

Offline thm_w

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6272
  • Country: ca
  • Non-expert
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #36 on: June 29, 2022, 10:28:26 pm »
Wheel motors have the best low speed performance at least, and should be able to accelerate faster from a stop

Profile -> Modify profile -> Look and Layout ->  Don't show users' signatures
 

Offline cortex_m0

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 114
  • Country: us
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #37 on: June 29, 2022, 10:57:43 pm »
He thinks its refreshing that this company wants to talk about highway speeds, but of course they do. That plays to the strengths of their design. What happens when he tries twisty roads, and other complexity, where the handling is paramount? Various people have tried motors in each wheel, and are defeated by the awful handling with a large unsprung mass.
Certainly possible. I have zero expertise in why automobiles handle the way they do.  I assume the Lightyear isn't trying to compete with a Land Rover, so maybe they think their customer won't care if this handles slightly worse than a Volkswagen Jetta.

Quote
It looks like there are some interesting things in the design, especially its drag coefficient. Perhaps leaving out the gimmicky solar panels might have made people focus more on those.

Tend to doubt it. It's much harder to market efficiency, compared to "First Street-Legal Solar Automobile!"
 

Online nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26751
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #38 on: June 29, 2022, 11:08:48 pm »
It looks like there are some interesting things in the design, especially its drag coefficient. Perhaps leaving out the gimmicky solar panels might have made people focus more on those.
There is nothing new about making a car with a low drag coefficient. Google 'hyper miling' and you'll see people have modified regular cars to a similar shape which improves the efficiency dramatically for many years. It is not a new design; just a matter of getting to public to accept a car which has such a long, odd shaped tail. The newest BEV from Mercedes uses a similar shape as well and they are not the only ones.
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 

Offline EEVblogTopic starter

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37661
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #39 on: June 30, 2022, 06:51:31 am »
It looks like there are some interesting things in the design, especially its drag coefficient. Perhaps leaving out the gimmicky solar panels might have made people focus more on those.

The solar panels are literally the only novel marketing point for a $250,000 EV
So it might be slightly better drag coefficient than other EV's, but that's kinda, meh.
If it got say twice the efficiency of other EV's on the maket then you might have something worth bragging about, but it's WLTP figure is only slightly better than my 2020 IONIQ.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2022, 06:53:11 am by EEVblog »
 

Offline EEVblogTopic starter

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37661
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #40 on: June 30, 2022, 06:55:58 am »
One of the automotive YouTube channels got a brief test drive of a Lightyear Zero prototype in Spain. It seems like the solar does generate meaningful power, and it continues to generate while in motion. On a perfect sunny day the solar wouldn't do much to extend a road trip, but even so the Lightyear Zero, per their specification, claims to be roughly 90% more efficient than a Nissan Leaf at 70 mph (110 kph). 6.5 miles (10.5km) per kWh for the Lightyear vs. 3.4 miles (5.4km) per kwh for the 2020 Nissan Leaf Plus, with a similar capacity battery.

Yet it's own marketing is aimed around less than 50km/day usage. So you won't be hitting highway speeds on big road trips.
If this thing only cost a bit more than other EV's then they'd have something, but at $250k they have a gimmick that cashed up buyers can brag to their friends that they drive a solar powered EV.
 

Offline EEVblogTopic starter

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37661
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #41 on: June 30, 2022, 06:58:23 am »
Aptera on the 2nd channel for those that didn't see it:
 

Online iMo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4673
  • Country: nr
  • It's important to try new things..
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #42 on: June 30, 2022, 08:43:51 am »
EU agrees to end sales of combustion engine vehicles by 2035..
 

Online nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26751
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #43 on: June 30, 2022, 09:34:56 am »
EU agrees to end sales of combustion engine vehicles by 2035..
No, the EU plans to end sales of ICE cars by 2035. Nothing is cast is stone. There are several points in time where the plan is re-evaluated.
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 
The following users thanked this post: iMo

Online coppice

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8605
  • Country: gb
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #44 on: June 30, 2022, 12:50:47 pm »
So it might be slightly better drag coefficient than other EV's, but that's kinda, meh.
If it got say twice the efficiency of other EV's on the maket then you might have something worth bragging about, but it's WLTP figure is only slightly better than my 2020 IONIQ.
Clearly this car is stupid as a product, simply due to the price, however....

The low drag coefficient is the key thing this car brings. Sure, you can find lots of demos of achieving a super low drag coefficient in a similarly shaped one person vehicle, but they've made a comfortable family car which achieves similar results. The WLTP figures are notoriously unrealistic. The range of most EVs goes down badly at high speed, mostly due to drag. If their claims are genuine, this car achieves a much more consistent range as the speed varies. People don't want cars they either drive at full motorway speed and spend lots of time at chargers, or spend less time at chargers but drive quite slowly.
 

Online Marco

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6693
  • Country: nl
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #45 on: June 30, 2022, 01:58:51 pm »
WLTP is fine, with true independent testing (when a car manufacturer decides which lab to do business with, it's not independent). If you want to recalculate EPA for different speed conditions, you can. The results are public and EPA does confirmative testing.

With WLTP half the data is private. EPA catches scammer where other countries do not.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2022, 02:06:41 pm by Marco »
 

Offline golden_labels

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1182
  • Country: pl
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #46 on: June 30, 2022, 02:05:37 pm »
EU agrees to end sales of combustion engine vehicles by 2035..
No, the EU plans to end sales of ICE cars by 2035. Nothing is cast is stone. There are several points in time where the plan is re-evaluated.
While normally I would frantically wave hands seeing “EU does foo”, in this case imo seems to be right. This week member states came to an agreement, which makes that statement correct.(1) The details are basically set and it would be a rare occurance for EUParl to reject those amendments. The fact, that those are corrections to a pre-existing regulation(2), is important to see why it’s likely to see no further objections. Normally some factions would probably make an ineffective protest as a show for their electorate, but in this case a part of the framing is the situation with RF — so I suspect they may avoid even that kind of actions during the actual voting.

It is also worth noting, that this does not eliminate internal combustion engines. Regulation’s scope is limited to passanger cars and LCVs. Any other vehicle group is still covered by the existing limits. And while currently no viable option exists, fuels offsetting CO2 emissions are not explicitly excluded either.


(1) https://www.reuters.com/business/sustainable-business/fight-over-funding-threatens-eu-deal-new-climate-laws-2022-06-28/
(2) 2019/631

« Last Edit: July 01, 2022, 01:44:26 pm by golden_labels »
People imagine AI as T1000. What we got so far is glorified T9.
 
The following users thanked this post: iMo

Online iMo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4673
  • Country: nr
  • It's important to try new things..
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #47 on: June 30, 2022, 03:31:16 pm »
Imagine the EU highways in, say, year 2125 - speedy and beautifully smelling ICE vintage classic cars everywhere  :D
 

Online nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26751
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #48 on: June 30, 2022, 03:43:30 pm »
WLTP is fine, with true independent testing (when a car manufacturer decides which lab to do business with, it's not independent). If you want to recalculate EPA for different speed conditions, you can. The results are public and EPA does confirmative testing.
I doubt that. The EPA fuel consumption numbers are typically on par with fuel consumption data collected by websites that track actual fuel consumption (collected from people that drive the cars around). WLTP data on the other hand is just nonsense.
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 

Online Marco

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6693
  • Country: nl
Re: EEVblog 1480 - Lightyear Zero Solar Powered Electric Car
« Reply #49 on: June 30, 2022, 05:09:51 pm »
The WLTP drag coefficient numbers are not confirmation tested, it's just some bullshit from either the manufacturers or at best third party labs entirely dependent on their continued contracts.

The problem is regulatory capture making the implementation of WLTP testing inherently corrupt. The test if honestly implemented is fine.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2022, 05:14:47 pm by Marco »
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf