What I'd be curious about would be to see independent testing of this - actual performance (frequency response @ 1m including distortion figures), and not just what is claimed by the vendor.
"Performance" is subjective.
With audio and to some degree, that is true. Hence the heavy debates constantly occuring about audio, and hence, at its extreme, the audiophool movement.
Which is why I mentioned objective measurements.
They can just say any result is deliberate.
Well, as long as it remotely makes sense, sure. Heck, if for instance it had bad distortion figures, but this "matched" the typical kind of distortion you get with tube amplifiers, why not. There are amateurs of this kind of distortion. But they are not typical buyers for this kind of gear... and the typical distortion you're bound to get with a less-than-ideal class-D (assuming it could be a mediocre implementation, in spite of the apparent "overengineering") is uh, not that pleasing.
But I think they are showing the frequency response in their manual, and probably some distortion figures? So one could at least check that those are not plain lies.
Apart from the amplifier, and despite the trumpets, I'm a bit wary of any stereo speakers inside the same enclosure. It's very hard to get anything close to what you can get with separate enclosures.
Dr Dre made $3BN by selling Beats, which is nothing more than his signature algorithm "sound". Put it on measurement gear and you'd probably say it's crap.
It may very well be indeed. Or not, that would have to be checked. The only thing here is: if whatever figures officially claimed by the vendor do not match reality, then those are just lies. Now of course, any abstract statement of "quality" doesn't count. It's very much exactly as with audiophool gear. If they claim their device has, say, -120 dB THD+N over 10 Hz to 20 kHz, while the reality is -90 dB, they are fricking lying. But if they claim their device sounds "warm with pristine highs", then sure, you can hardly beat that with any measurement.
I think we'll agree that popularity is not a sign of quality.