Author Topic: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup  (Read 19031 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 30130
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« on: July 13, 2012, 11:03:26 pm »


Dave.
 

Offline electrode

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 141
  • Country: au
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #1 on: July 14, 2012, 12:06:58 am »
Is he gonna be okay, doctor?
 

Offline KTP

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 515
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #2 on: July 14, 2012, 12:09:14 am »
I am not going to hook up 7V to my 50ohm input when I get my MSOX3024A...I bet it has similar limits to that 13GHz scope (5V max)

I am thinking when you mentioned in the other video that it can handle 300V you probably meant with the 1M input impedance.
 

Offline olsenn

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 993
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #3 on: July 14, 2012, 12:40:26 am »
Dave; where the f&#@ did you get that 13GHz DSO??? I'm assuming that isn't your personal device?

As for the 5V max input, I have a similar constraint on my DSA815 spectrum analyzer; I just attached a 30db attenuator to the input and leave it there. Honestly, I can't tell why low-Z is even required as the noise floor isn't greatly increased when I add a large resistor (especially when I turn the preamp on). I realize my device only goes to 1.5GHz and not 13GHz, but even still, most 50-ohm scopes are not much higher bandwidth than 500MHz and a DSO could easily read 1GHz+ signals with a 100k+ input impedance.
 

Offline StubbornGreek

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 292
  • Country: us
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #4 on: July 14, 2012, 01:10:28 am »
Crapped my pants at 30 seconds...  ???

The 'stand-in' scope was good enough to fuel round two, lol.

Very informative, thank you - as always.
"The reward of a thing well done is to have it done"
-Ralph Waldo Emerson
 

Offline Rufus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2094
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #5 on: July 14, 2012, 01:58:11 am »
I am not going to hook up 7V to my 50ohm input when I get my MSOX3024A...I bet it has similar limits to that 13GHz scope (5V max)
The limit is printed on the front of the scope 5v rms which is 0.5W input power.

higher bandwidth than 500MHz and a DSO could easily read 1GHz+ signals with a 100k+ input impedance.

The Agilent 2GHz active probe Dave opened in the last mailbag vid costs more than a DSA-815-TG and has an input capacitance of 1pF. 1pF at 1GHz has an impedance of 159 ohms. The capacitance of just a BNC plug and socket is around 3pF. It is practically impossible for anything to present a 100k input impedance at 1GHz.

Oh and Dave - lol at the size of that attenuator.
« Last Edit: July 14, 2012, 02:01:05 am by Rufus »
 

alm

  • Guest
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #6 on: July 14, 2012, 01:58:54 am »
Honestly, I can't tell why low-Z is even required as the noise floor isn't greatly increased when I add a large resistor (especially when I turn the preamp on). I realize my device only goes to 1.5GHz and not 13GHz, but even still, most 50-ohm scopes are not much higher bandwidth than 500MHz and a DSO could easily read 1GHz+ signals with a 100k+ input impedance.
Hi-Z scopes have something like 8 pF of input capacitance. At 1 GHz, this has an impedance of about 20 ohm. A 10x probe will have an impedance of at best 200 ohm (usually worse since it also adds its own capacitance). I believe Tektronix is currently the only one selling a 1 GHz Hi-Z probe. What's the point of a 100 kohm resistor with effectively a 20 ohm resistor in parallel? Not to mention that 100 kohm transmission lines are somewhat impractical. If you want a higher input impedance, use an active probe (which can have a much lower input capacitance because the amplifier is right at the probe tip) into a 50 ohm input.
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 30130
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #7 on: July 14, 2012, 02:06:03 am »
I believe Tektronix is currently the only one selling a 1 GHz Hi-Z probe.

I showed an Agilent 2GHz 1M/1pF probe in the latest mailbag video.

Dave.
 

alm

  • Guest
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #8 on: July 14, 2012, 02:36:02 am »
Let me rephrase that: I believe that Tektronix is currently the only one selling a 1 GHz probe that works with a hi-Z input. Active probes beyond 500 MHz have existed since before you were born (I think they can have bandwidths of tens of GHz now), but passive hi-Z probes were limited to 500 MHz until a few years ago. The fast active probes are usually limited to 50 ohm inputs, hence the need for low impedance inputs on faster scopes.
 

Offline KTP

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 515
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #9 on: July 14, 2012, 02:42:48 am »

The limit is printed on the front of the scope 5v rms which is 0.5W input power.


What does the input circuitry of the Agilent 3000x series look like?  Is there some sort of transorb when it is switched to 50ohm, or is the danger just exceeding the power dissipation of the termination?  2pf charged to 7V discharged over 4ns isn't going to cause any thermal issues, but I don't know what other circuitry might be unprotected at the 50 ohm setting on the scope...
 

Offline vk6zgo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5057
  • Country: au
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #10 on: July 14, 2012, 03:27:18 am »
I am not going to hook up 7V to my 50ohm input when I get my MSOX3024A...I bet it has similar limits to that 13GHz scope (5V max)

I am thinking when you mentioned in the other video that it can handle 300V you probably meant with the 1M input impedance.

I believe you are correct,as 300V RMS across 50 Ohms is 1.8kW!! ;D

 

Offline KTP

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 515
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #11 on: July 14, 2012, 03:47:52 am »
I am not going to hook up 7V to my 50ohm input when I get my MSOX3024A...I bet it has similar limits to that 13GHz scope (5V max)

I am thinking when you mentioned in the other video that it can handle 300V you probably meant with the 1M input impedance.

I believe you are correct,as 300V RMS across 50 Ohms is 1.8kW!! ;D

I did a bit of a double take when Dave said "we are used to scopes that can handle 300V" :)

Still, I wonder if there really is any harm putting a low duty cycle 7V, 10V or even 90V pulse into the 50 ohm input if it is coming from a 2pF cap...lets see...using energy stored = (CV^2)/2 that would be about 8 nanojoules....probably not going to hurt a 50ohm resistor...
 

Offline Psi

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7369
  • Country: nz
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #12 on: July 14, 2012, 04:01:19 am »
Still, I wonder if there really is any harm putting a low duty cycle 7V, 10V or even 90V pulse into the 50 ohm input if it is coming from a 2pF cap...lets see...using energy stored = (CV^2)/2 that would be about 8 nanojoules....probably not going to hurt a 50ohm resistor...

Yeah, 10V with such a tiny amount of energy is not going to do anything bad.

The real issue is... are you going to take the risk with a $140,000 scope that's on loan   ;)
« Last Edit: July 14, 2012, 04:03:22 am by Psi »
Greek letter 'Psi' (not Pounds per Square Inch)
 

Offline KTP

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 515
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #13 on: July 14, 2012, 04:09:09 am »


Yeah, 10V with such a tiny amount of energy is not going to do anything bad.

The real issue is... are you going to take the risk with a $140,000 scope that's on loan   ;)

You ask this about a guy who tosses a 500mhz scope on the floor and drop tests a $30,000 MDO?  ;D

I am quite suprised he didn't end the episode with a car driving over the 13 ghz unit.
 

Offline Psi

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7369
  • Country: nz
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #14 on: July 14, 2012, 04:17:18 am »
You ask this about a guy who tosses a 500mhz scope on the floor and drop tests a $30,000 MDO?  ;D

The fall was obviously staged, probably to counter all the youtube hate comments about the techtronic vs car video... Time to drop an Agilent to make things even :)

Unless of course if that was the intention and it missed the mattress or the person off-screen failed to catch it, which would be sad.
« Last Edit: July 14, 2012, 04:20:44 am by Psi »
Greek letter 'Psi' (not Pounds per Square Inch)
 

Offline vk6zgo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5057
  • Country: au
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #15 on: July 14, 2012, 04:21:39 am »
I am not going to hook up 7V to my 50ohm input when I get my MSOX3024A...I bet it has similar limits to that 13GHz scope (5V max)

I am thinking when you mentioned in the other video that it can handle 300V you probably meant with the 1M input impedance.

I believe you are correct,as 300V RMS across 50 Ohms is 1.8kW!! ;D

I did a bit of a double take when Dave said "we are used to scopes that can handle 300V" :)

Still, I wonder if there really is any harm putting a low duty cycle 7V, 10V or even 90V pulse into the 50 ohm input if it is coming from a 2pF cap...lets see...using energy stored = (CV^2)/2 that would be about 8 nanojoules....probably not going to hurt a 50ohm resistor...
Yeah,good point--you might take the chance if it was your own 'scope!
Of course,the rating is for worst case conditions,like a 5v RMS sinewave,or even DC.

With external terminations,as a lot of us use, if we accidentally put 300V across it,we'd just say,
"Bummer!.I've cooked the termination--where's the other one!",& dig through the junkbox till you find it. ;D
 

Offline EEVblog

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 30130
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #16 on: July 14, 2012, 07:07:25 am »
Yeah, 10V with such a tiny amount of energy is not going to do anything bad.

Pointless even trying when it's only got 1V/div max.

Dave.
 

Offline tnt

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 237
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #17 on: July 14, 2012, 07:11:06 am »
The 3000-X has a 5V RMS max when on 50 ohm (it written on the front panel) but I suspect this is just the power inside the termination ... I doubt the energy of the pulse would do any real damage.
 

Offline SeanB

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 15167
  • Country: za
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #18 on: July 14, 2012, 07:28:13 am »
Might also be that on terminated position it bypasses some input protection, and excursions above this would damage an input amplifier stage.
 

Offline tnt

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 237
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #19 on: July 14, 2012, 07:43:50 am »
Wouldn't they specify a peak voltage in that case as well ? My SA has both a RMS max power and a peak DC spec.

From the little I know bypassing input protection would be useful to get better front end bandwith but here you have the same specs for 50R and 1M. What would be the benefit of disabling them ? Better matching across all the bandwidth maybe ?
 

Offline SeanB

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 15167
  • Country: za
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #20 on: July 14, 2012, 07:59:08 am »
I would suggest using a SMA connector to connect the coax, you are seeing the end termination in the beginning, and the connector will give a constant impedance for the initial connection.
 

Offline hans

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1042
  • Country: nl
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #21 on: July 14, 2012, 09:47:55 am »
What I think more is a possibility of the low input limits is just protecting the silicon (well if they use it on this 13GHz model). I think it's incredibly hard to protect GHz signals. An protection diode may be ruining the signal performance. Especially at 13GHz , just an extra trace to a diode can ruin the input circuitry.

A class mate of mine got a HP network analyzer for free from college. The RF output was broken and the power supply failed.He fixed the power supply, some feedback opto's were dead. RF output was broken because some amplifier shorted out one of it rails, and the bond wires were gone. Someone probably connected an output signal of a network to the RF output. Bad luck, the RF module only costs a couple of thousand dollars. Ah well, he has a nice spectrum analyzer now though.
So, RF equipment are just very sensitive. Like, you also don't turn on a RF modem without an antenna right?

+/-5V sounds sufficient for differential signals, which I think this scope is designed for (measuring quality of transmission lines)
Whilst Dave got it, maybe he can do some signal testing with his Marconi function generator, and transmission lines?:D Just watch out for overshoot :)
« Last Edit: July 14, 2012, 10:26:15 am by hans »
 

Offline A Hellene

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 601
  • Country: gr
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #22 on: July 14, 2012, 03:16:29 pm »
Dave, can I have that cheep and useless 500 MHz item you trashed on the floor, in the beginning of the presentation (at approx. 0:00:30)? :P


-George
Hi! This is George; and I am three and a half years old!
(This was one of my latest realisations, now in my early fifties!...)
 

Offline Ketturi

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 65
  • Country: fi
    • Ketturi Electronics
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #23 on: July 15, 2012, 10:13:00 am »
Well now we know how this little tester can perform i tough getting it and test my old Kenwood CS-5140 40Mhz analog higher-end(?) scope. Well it have some kind of sampling functionality from 40Mhz to 100Mhz range, but still i don't think it will be much better than cheap rigols. Does same practice as using DSO work with analog scope, at least i guess so.

But 13Ghz, wow, that is some naughty scope, I haven't even seen devices using so high frequencies. It would be really interesting see teardown, what magical stuff that box involves. But well, someday in future when we have flying DeLoreans and 13Thz scopes that equipment will be as ancient as WWII era scopes now.
Ketturi electronics: http://ketturi.kapsi.fi
 

Offline jahonen

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1046
  • Country: fi
Re: EEVblog #311 - Jim Williams Pulser Followup
« Reply #24 on: July 15, 2012, 10:44:48 am »
I have been reading Howard Johnsons book "High-speed signal propagation" and he mentions that skin effect induced loss affects the waveform so that it has relatively sharp edge but then slowly rising top. I wonder if those waveforms are affected by the skin-effect loss. Jim Williams used hardline coax in AN-94 (along with other edge-shaping components), which has much lower loss. That would be interesting to see. or even semi-rigid one.

Regards,
Janne
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf