-
What is the JTAG interface and Boundary Scanning, how does it work, and what is it useful for?
-
As always, thank you Dave.
Has anyone tried to configure a Xilinx chip using an embedded microcontroller (even SVF or XSVF player)? That would be an interesting subject.
There are some libraries out there based on xapp058 App Note, but I wonder which of them is better to get started with.
I also wanted to know if it is better to use an FT2232 in conjunction with an application on the PC in order to configure FPGA/CPLD chips instead of using a microcontroller.
Thanks. -
The problem with that is that the PC will have to essentially bit bang the whole JTAG protocol. The good side is that it can be reconfigured by software very easily.
-
As always, thank you Dave.
Most FPGAs have simpler configuration options than JTAG for use with microcontrollers, so you'd normally use that rather then JTAG.
Has anyone tried to configure a Xilinx chip using an embedded microcontroller (even SVF or XSVF player)? That would be an interesting subject.
There are some libraries out there based on xapp058 App Note, but I wonder which of them is better to get started with.
I also wanted to know if it is better to use an FT2232 in conjunction with an application on the PC in order to configure FPGA/CPLD chips instead of using a microcontroller.
Thanks.
Not sure what Xilinx offer, but Lattice supply some nice code for JTAG device programming (CPLDs and FPGAS) from microcontollers, which is very easy to integrate, and can program from a file from your filesystem (SD etc) , or from a CONST data array, auto-generated by their ISPVM programmer software from the device JEDEC file.. -
Very informative Dave, excellent
-
Most FPGAs have simpler configuration options than JTAG for use with microcontrollers, so you'd normally use that rather then JTAG.
Not sure what Xilinx offer, but Lattice supply some nice code for JTAG device programming (CPLDs and FPGAS) from microcontollers, which is very easy to integrate, and can program from a file from your filesystem (SD etc) , or from a CONST data array, auto-generated by their ISPVM programmer software from the device JEDEC file..
Thanks Mike.
So, you say that using a microcontroller to program an FPGA/CPLD is better than bit banging the configuration file directly to the chip from the PC?
Yeah, I know that there are better ways to configure modern FPGAs, but I want to use JTAG to program low-cost Xilinx chips.
Xilinx also offers a code library for configuring their chips using JTAG, but I didn't find it easy to start with. -
Bit-banging anything from a PC is going to be slow, and impossible when USB is the only IO available.Use a proper JTAG inteface - either one with an MCU, or the FTDI solution which handles the low-level protocol in hardware.
I was referring to embedded systems where a MCU needs to update CPLD/FPGA code in the field.
-
JTAG reverse engineering video :
-
I remember you opening up a dangerous prototypes Bus Blaster in a mail bag a while back. That would be a good open source hobbyist alternative to the pro tools.
http://dangerousprototypes.com/docs/Bus_Blaster -
its not necessary to go through all pins. jtag has a number of commands. there are general commands and device specific commands.
in a chain, after powerup, you would first send the command to identify how many devices are on the bus. (basically you send in a single logic 1 and clock. count the number of clockticks before the one comes back out. that the number of devices. then send the identify command. each device will send out manufacturer and part number.
then you can tell individual devices to temporarily go in 'bypass'. meaning they pull their chain out of the loop and short their tdi and tdo together. that is how you speed up since you don't need to race through those shifters.
there are even ttl chips with jtag. there is an equivalent of a 74245 with 4 jtag pins. this allows you to inject such a device in a critical pathway on a complex board and ease testing.
or , using a little adapter board, temporarily remove the 74245 and pop the jtag version in. hook up the jtag dongle to the little adapter board and bob's your uncle.
74bct8245 is such a part. there is a whole family of em http://www.ti.com/lsds/ti/logic/boundary-scan-jtag-logic-products.page
now, before you get all excited and think about building your own superduper jtag tool : most of the information pertaining to guts of the devices are secret. some manufacturer specify some of the codes (the comon ones as mandated by the standard,but some of the advanced stuff is under NDA ...
therefore the JTAG probes with that fancy software that dave showed cost $$$ -
Another excellent FF video. Thanks Dave!
-
Great video!
Is there an OSS/free equivalent to the XJAnalyser software for use with Bus Blaster or similar tools? Definitely looks like a useful tool for reverse engineer and hw hacking. -
Great video!
Is there an OSS/free equivalent to the XJAnalyser software for use with Bus Blaster or similar tools? Definitely looks like a useful tool for reverse engineer and hw hacking.
limited, yes. like i said : the real algorithms are only made available to select partners under NDA. -
How does the XJTAG tool compare to the jtag tools offered by, say, Atmel for programming and debugging their own chips?
Can XJTAG be used instead of the atmel tools? On my todo list is to get an ARM dev board and play with that - will any JTAG tool allow me to program the ARM?
Frank -
Another excellent FF video. Thanks Dave!
Seconded, never heard of it until now, but fascinating stuff. -
How does the XJTAG tool compare to the jtag tools offered by, say, Atmel for programming and debugging their own chips?
Can XJTAG be used instead of the atmel tools? On my todo list is to get an ARM dev board and play with that - will any JTAG tool allow me to program the ARM?
Frank
Yes, there are a couple of JTAG Programmer/Debugger tools for ARM processors. You can use XJTAG for that purpose in ARM RealView, but you know, XJTAG is quite expensive.
You can use J-Link Programmer and Debugger for ARM processors. It is easy to use and much cheaper than the XJTAG. -
limited, yes. like i said : the real algorithms are only made available to select partners under NDA.
Altium Designer has this ability to live view the boundary scan data and map to images of the chip and pins (via the USB JTAG adapter), even funkier than the XJTAG software if you are the PCB designer (no capability for production test system etc). I don't recall it having any of that additional secret squirrel capability though. -
will any JTAG tool allow me to program the ARM?
In theory, yes. In practice, the software has to support the device on question. -
other good boundary scan programms:
Universal Scan - http://www.universalscan.com/
TopJTAG - http://www.topjtag.com/
The TOPJtag is already good enought for most things, it is as well cheaper than UniversalScan.
UniversalScan have excellent videos as well, easy to understand how to use that app.
Both can use tons of other/known JTAG cables, no need to buy special one from Boundary Scan tool manufacturer.
Their software is comparable to XJAnalyser, where (in my opinion) UniversalScan is a bit better than TopJTAG. -
Thanks Dave, that was a very useful video.
Another fun usage of JTAG reverse engineering I've seen was here:
http://nsa.unaligned.org/jrev.php
Where he reverse engineered the schematic (or rather some of it) for a whole really big board. -
i am a bit confused about the hardware & the software for JTAG.
there are a number of different devices, like pic32 ,xilinx FPGA, Altera FPGA and ARM processor they all have JTAG . i know they we can access them by a same jtag cable but.
what i am wondering if FT2232 based JTAG hardware will work for all of them ?
is there software or hardware tool available for hobby use like with limited functionality. -
Excellent video Dave!
Found a quick pricelist for the XJTAG thing - have a look at this: http://www.anacom.com.br/downloads/pdf/XJTAG-USPL-Q1-2011.pdf -
what i am wondering if FT2232 based JTAG hardware will work for all of them ?
Hi, look for urjtag. Although it is cmdline-tool (that might limit its functionality for some, but it's open source, so you can write your own gui if you want one) it should be sufficient for the hobbyist.
is there software or hardware tool available for hobby use like with limited functionality.
-
Excellent video Dave thanks
-
what i am wondering if FT2232 based JTAG hardware will work for all of them ?
Hi, look for urjtag. Although it is cmdline-tool (that might limit its functionality for some, but it's open source, so you can write your own gui if you want one) it should be sufficient for the hobbyist.
is there software or hardware tool available for hobby use like with limited functionality.
Thank you