https://www.eevblog.com/forum/blog/eevblog-653-sydney-maker-faire-2014-highlights/?action=dlattach;attach=106188
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/blog/eevblog-653-sydney-maker-faire-2014-highlights/?action=dlattach;attach=106261
First one had literally three frames whacked on top of each other.
Is there any blur in individual frames in the source material (file directly off the camera)?
Yes, exactly the same/ From the original 50fps original file from the camera:
Im asking because frame I used for comparison is from a perfectly/fully lit room (room with skylight?) - there just has to be something wrong with the post processing.
No, you are wrong, it's the original footage.
And no, it was not a perfectly lit room. Not that it would matter because even a well light indoor room has vastly less light than outdoors, even on a dim overcast day.
And if you think it's the Canon HFG30 camera, try this, which was shot in a similar light environment, possibly better than the above example:
That's from the $2500 Sony NEX VG30 with a huge APS-C size DSLR sensor shot at the full 60fps capability.
http://store.sony.com/interchangeable-lens-hd-camcorder-and-lens-zid27-NEXVG30H/cat-27-catid-All-NEX-CamcordersThey both look nothing like a footage from $700 camera
Then you don't know enough about how cameras work.
Cameras are not magic, when you pan quickly, as in this case you are fussing over, this is what you will typically get in an indoors type light environment.
There are ways to avoid it manually but it requires a lot of setup to get right and compromises.
In auto mode you have no such luxury and you get what you get. Don't want the blurring? pan very slowly and carefully. Good luck doing that when you are getting ad-hock walking around footage.
Welcome to the world of videography.
I guess its highly subjective, I still believe you can do better
Yes, but it takes a
lot of time and effort, something you don't have when you are getting footage like this.