$ youtube-dl -F FtcZ9K8551s
[youtube] FtcZ9K8551s: Downloading webpage
[youtube] FtcZ9K8551s: Extracting video information
[info] Available formats for FtcZ9K8551s:
format code extension resolution note
17 3gp 176x144 (worst)
36 3gp 320x240
5 flv 400x240
18 mp4 640x360 (best)
You probably were a bit quick off the mark. More formats are available now.You are absolutely right. Youtube just rendered 1080P DASH stream. They should upgrade their servers :-DD The infamous 60fps stream is not yet rendered. ^-^
youtube-dl -F FtcZ9K8551s
[youtube] FtcZ9K8551s: Downloading webpage
[youtube] FtcZ9K8551s: Extracting video information
[youtube] FtcZ9K8551s: Downloading DASH manifest
[info] Available formats for FtcZ9K8551s:
format code extension resolution note
140 m4a audio only DASH audio , audio@128k (worst)
139 m4a audio only DASH audio 51k , audio@ 48k (22050Hz), 14.01MiB
140 m4a audio only DASH audio 131k , audio@128k (44100Hz), 37.28MiB
141 m4a audio only DASH audio 258k , audio@256k (44100Hz), 74.04MiB
160 mp4 144p DASH video , video only
160 mp4 256x144 DASH video 121k , 13fps, video only, 32.44MiB
133 mp4 240p DASH video , video only
133 mp4 426x240 DASH video 264k , 25fps, video only, 72.75MiB
134 mp4 360p DASH video , video only
134 mp4 640x360 DASH video 610k , 25fps, video only, 95.28MiB
135 mp4 480p DASH video , video only
135 mp4 854x480 DASH video 1117k , 25fps, video only, 200.64MiB
136 mp4 720p DASH video , video only
136 mp4 1280x720 DASH video 2225k , 25fps, video only, 405.15MiB
137 mp4 1080p DASH video , video only
137 mp4 1920x1080 DASH video 4181k , 25fps, video only, 823.30MiB
17 3gp 176x144
36 3gp 320x240
5 flv 400x240
18 mp4 640x360 (best)I wonder why Dave was impressed by an MTBF of 250k hours?
You should know that is NOT what a 250k hour MTBF means.I wonder why Dave was impressed by an MTBF of 250k hours?
A 36% probability the scope still works after almost 23 years of 24/7 operation is not bad.
I'm more impressed that they actually specify it, and presumably have done the testing and calcs to come up with that figure, than the actual figure itself.
Did I blink in the wrong place or was there no mention of price?
(Or is asking about the price the wrong thing to do... :-X )
I wonder, can those oscilloscopes be overclocked for better performance?
For the price they charge, it should include a Core i7 4790K, a decent PCI - express SSD, in addition to a better ASIC, in addition to 802.11ac 4 stream, and 10 gigabit Ethernet (and a bunch of eSATA ports, and a bunch of server functions so that you can get your ESXi on while probing stuff) just for the hell of it.
I wonder, can those oscilloscopes be overclocked for better performance?
For the price they charge, it should include a Core i7 4790K, a decent PCI - express SSD, in addition to a better ASIC, in addition to 802.11ac 4 stream, and 10 gigabit Ethernet (and a bunch of eSATA ports, and a bunch of server functions so that you can get your ESXi on while probing stuff) just for the hell of it.
As far as I know they do everything that must be done in real time via the ASICs. So the i7 would be very bored in such a device.
It may help with the boot speeds, and general UI functions. There is no reason not to add faster components even if they will just be used to boot the system and run the UI when they want an astronomically high price of $13,000+ for their scope.
For that price, it should be performing additional functions like virtualized hosting + a SAN
Did I blink in the wrong place or was there no mention of price?
(Or is asking about the price the wrong thing to do... :-X )
DSOX3014T £2,701
DSOX3024T £3,012
DSOX3034T £5,619
DSOX3054T £7,583
Add about £1000 on for MSO option.
[...] I wonder what percentage of time they use the touch interface vs the keys/buttons?
I wonder, can those oscilloscopes be overclocked for better performance?
For the price they charge, it should include a Core i7 4790K, a decent PCI - express SSD, in addition to a better ASIC, in addition to 802.11ac 4 stream, and 10 gigabit Ethernet (and a bunch of eSATA ports, and a bunch of server functions so that you can get your ESXi on while probing stuff) just for the hell of it.
As far as I know they do everything that must be done in real time via the ASICs. So the i7 would be very bored in such a device.
It may help with the boot speeds, and general UI functions. There is no reason not to add faster components even if they will just be used to boot the system and run the UI when they want an astronomically high price of $13,000+ for their scope.
Any reasons to buy a Keysight DSOX3000T series instead of an equivalent a a lot cheaper Rigol MSO/DS2000A Series ?I think the DS2000A is not the right scope to compare with DSOX3000T.
Any reasons to buy a Keysight DSOX3000T series instead of an equivalent a a lot cheaper Rigol MSO/DS2000A Series ?I think the DS2000A is not the right scope to compare with DSOX3000T.
Maybe you could make a comparison between DSOX3000T and Rigol DS4000?
As far as I know they do everything that must be done in real time via the ASICs. So the i7 would be very bored in such a device.
Great review, but all I can think is; what happened to the review of the new Rigol DS1000Z... Did Keysight 'bribe' you not the review it?
The 3000T X-Series has excellent signal integrity, including full bandwidth to 1 mV/div
1 mV/div and 2 mV/div are a magnification of 4 mV/div setting.
And when we're on the topic of bandwidth: why not a comparison of a 1GHz signal being measured with the MDO3000 and the 3000T using the supplied probes? The Tek comes with 1GHz probes compared to the 500MHz ones Keysight provides. What difference does this make in practice? Surely a topic worth investigating!
Great review, but all I can think is; what happened to the review of the new Rigol DS1000Z... Did Keysight 'bribe' you not the review it?
(i'd love to know the marketing reasons behind simply chucking over 40 years of company heritage in the bin for a new "shiny" name??)It was a case of bits of the company splitting away and they couldn't both keep the same name so the measurement group had to come up with a different one. I think there was a similar story behind Agilent being created from HP when that happened.
a refresh of the 3k series make you wonder if they'll refresh the 2k series as well.
(i'd love to know the marketing reasons behind simply chucking over 40 years of company heritage in the bin for a new "shiny" name??)It was a case of bits of the company splitting away and they couldn't both keep the same name so the measurement group had to come up with a different one. I think there was a similar story behind Agilent being created from HP when that happened.
I wonder if there will be any more firmware updates for the 3000x now that is in out.Maybe they'll follow the Microsoft approach of continuing to update the old product until its so slow you desperately want the new one. :)
but now (I presume) they're back to charging hundreds of $$$ for each and every serial protocol decoder, the whole range just became much worse value :(
They also continue to benchmark against similarly-priced Tek, when I suspect their real competition is much less expensive Chinese brands.
Still stumped that Keysight doesn't do just the box, and couple it to a tablet with a decent display, a la Samsung Galaxy Note 12.2
In any case, correct me if I am wrong, didn't Dave mention the resolution was fixed by virtue of reusing the same ASICs.
Help us old guys with bad eyes out. BIG screens with Lots of resolution.
Still stumped that Keysight doesn't do just the box, and couple it to a tablet with a decent display, a la Samsung Galaxy Note 12.2I doubt the display update rate would be anywhere near as good if the screen had to get dumped over LAN/WiFi.
So I went ahead and looked up the price tag for this one the MSO-X 3104T.
15K+ USD.
Well, I don't see how that is interesting. It is a bloody toy for a bloody rich kid who wants flashy colors and two strippers on some shiny pole, and that isn't with all the functionality included even. You have to pay for the extras. Bloody yarn balls, they keep low balling suckers in the nut sack!!!! and they ask for more?
I don't know about you guys, but I think I can look up some hardware for the same specs with lower price tag and it doesn't have to be from the mainland either. Forget about the MTBF, that is just a load of dun, predictions are for your horoscopes....
We've got hardware H264 encoders these days. The mobile device only has to stream video.Still stumped that Keysight doesn't do just the box, and couple it to a tablet with a decent display, a la Samsung Galaxy Note 12.2I doubt the display update rate would be anywhere near as good if the screen had to get dumped over LAN/WiFi.
And personally, I really like having physical knobs and buttons.
Take a look at the Agilent 7000 Series scope. That screen is so big it is a real pleasure to work with.we have a MSO-x 4000 And the screen is a joy to work with. bigger screen means you see more from the data.
It has a 12.1" XGA display and good size letters of text, easily readable
MSOX3024T with all licenses ~13K Euro. Better try to get a used 4 channel MSOX3024A with all licenses for a third of the the price.
I admit, I had my prejudices with the touch screen. During Daves video I thought sometimes "nah - don't need it" and sometimes I though "well, quicker as with the regular knobs and buttons".
But then - at the end of the video (at 35:30) - Dave reaffirmed my prejudices by showing the screen of the scope :o (see screenshot attached) and now I know: no, I DO NOT WANT a smeared and smudgy screen covered with fingerprints and dirt.
I know enough people who do not care - many seem to even never clean their glasses. Brrrrr. But I do care - I want a clean screen. My mobile phone can be cleaned quickly by wiping it at my shirt or trousers, the scope will need a dedicated peace of cloth laying around and will need some time to be cleaned.
But in a few years, when they finally invented grease repellent screens, I probably will be interested....
Great review, but all I can think is; what happened to the review of the new Rigol DS1000Z... Did Keysight 'bribe' you not the review it?
Don't be ridiculous. And I've explained why a dozen times.
Did I blink in the wrong place or was there no mention of price? (Or is asking about the price the wrong thing to do... :-X )Dave said it will be the same price as the older MSOX3000A model
Any reasons to buy a Keysight DSOX3000T series instead of an equivalent a a lot cheaper Rigol MSO/DS2000A Series ?A few but not worth it IMHO. Smart probes, bandwidth, touch screen, better fft features and a few options already included.
So I went ahead and looked up the price tag for this one the MSO-X 3104T.
15K+ USD.
Well, I don't see how that is interesting. It is a bloody toy for a bloody rich kid who wants flashy colors and two strippers on some shiny pole, and that isn't with all the functionality included even. You have to pay for the extras. Bloody yarn balls, they keep low balling suckers in the nut sack!!!! and they ask for more?
I don't know about you guys, but I think I can look up some hardware for the same specs with lower price tag and it doesn't have to be from the mainland either. Forget about the MTBF, that is just a load of dun, predictions are for your horoscopes....
You won't get the same specs. Nor will you get the same support.
Sorry, but these are not targetted at cheap hobbyists, they're made for professionals and companies.