For an 8 GW 40 km link laid under the English Channel, the following are approximate primary equipment costs for a 2000 MW 500 kV bipolar conventional HVDC link (exclude way-leaving, on-shore reinforcement works, consenting, engineering, insurance, etc.)
Converter stations ~£110M (~€120M or $173.7M)
Subsea cable + installation ~£1M/km (~€1.2M or ~$1.6M/km)
So for an 8 GW capacity between Britain and France in four links, little is left over from £750M for the installed works. Add another £200–300M for the other works depending on additional onshore works required.[37]
Wikipedia
So that 3800 KM cable would cost about 4B EUR to make.
10 GW system about 8B EUR.
About 100EUR/kWh for the battery would mean 3BEUR
The land is about 1000 AUD/ha, as far as I can see, if you buy a farm with cattle and everything. For 12000 ha... What a joke...
But I think we can estimate the cable thickness and losses from the economical perspective. We know, how much utility scale solar costs, it's about 0.8EUR/W.
This is designed by engineers, and they know what they are doing. So you are not going to invest about 4B into a second cable, to save 10% energy loss. Why? Because you can buy 10% extra energy capacity for 800M. Maybe they still going to install a second cable for redundancy reasons, calculating the cost of power loss is harder.
This could have actually much smaller cables, and higher losses ( maybe even higher than the estimated 20% in the video), because the solar capacity is cheaper than the cable.