Dave, entertaining and interesting video as usual. My fingers are crossed for you with this one. Sam's advice will help. I've done some 93XX repairs, so there are a few LeCroy owners in Oz. I've had a LeCroy 9310M for 9 years now. With WP01 and WP02 waveform processing options, it is a complete design lab in itself. Despite its age, it is the most useful and capable piece of test gear I own.
I recently thought I'd try one of the low cost modern DSOs. I did a ton of research and bought a Hantek DSO5102B for 630 bucks. It was the only low cost DSO with a display of 800 horizontal by 480 vertical - think about 8 bit vertical digitising (256 levels) most cheap scope screens only have QVGA or 240 vertical pixels available. It's no wonder they show jaggy looking sine waves. The display always suffers from vertical alias since it can't show 256 levels in 240 pixels. The Hantek is one of the few cheaper DSOs that also has a proper acquired_memory_to_display_compression_algorithm. Think about how to display 40k of data onto only 800 horizontal pixels... Most DSOs simply decimate that data and show only a tiny percentage, 40k/800 = 1 point in every 50! The other 49 are not shown. Decimation totally destroys the ability of the screen to show narrow features, like a pulse. The Hantek colour screen is nice. Screen=good, everything_else=sucks. I thought ten years of development might have improved the lower cost designs. The digitisers are noticeably noisy, the software is average and buggy, and you simply can't replace the raw horsepower of the LeCroy hardware with software, it just doesn't compare. The 9310 has a lot of ECL chips inside. Frankly, considering the low cost, the Hantek is useful, but by comparison, the Hantek is a tricycle and the LeCroy is a Ferrari. There are no seat belts, no hands held, you gotta read the book, and work those knobs, but it performs superbly and gives you so much. I've used a 9310 to measure video pre-emphasis in a video signal going into an FM modulator loop at only 2 millivolts peak to peak. You can't even see that signal with a cheap scope let alone measure it. I've used a 9310 to find a millivolt magentic resonance signal amongst 20 volts of RF interference! The LeCroy is like a surgical knife where other scopes are just hammers. No-one expects to drive a Ferrari with no training, or to perform surgery without learning how to do it. DSOs require some reading and time learning to drive them. I get a bit annoyed when people complain that LeCroy are "hard to drive". My answer is, so is a Ferrari, if you want easy, here's a billy cart...
Ivan747 said "I didn't know there were oscilloscope brand fans!" I guess there is. I'm not a one-eyed fanboy. It's based on years of experience using different DSOs and seeing the results. The modern up market HPs seem to have caught up with LeCroy, and there are other makers that look ok, but I have no personal experience with DSOs like Rhode and Schwarz, Hameg, Iwatsu and Yokogawa. In terms of bang for buck, the older LeCroys are amazing, despite the obvious issues of keeping such older gear running.
Good luck mate, Colin