i was about to give Hantek name a big thumbs up for somehow "Open Source"ing their 3x25 HW through SDK at least so we can develop our own program, for me the hardware is good, no other HW that can do the same, price the same, as you already know/searched, the same priced "dedicated" bench type only can go up to 2-3MHz, 3x25 is hackable to 100MHz
I think open sourcing the 3x25 is a big word for providing an SDK. All reputable vendors have been shipping VISA drivers for years, and usually also document the SCPI protocol. Just because some of the low-end vendors suck at documentation and software doesn't make Hantek special in this case.
and low Vpp is not a problem even for people like me.
It is a problem if the application requires 20Vp-p.
Its been in the top 10 threads for ~ 1 year. Good work mecha! While I prefer non-USB instruments for ease of use, if a USB instrument is better spec wise its a worthy trade off. I think using virtual instruments will be less of a bother once we get them working on platforms like Android or iPhone/iPad because those platforms boot faster and touch screens are faster than working with only a mouse.
Given Apple's history the latter will probably only happen if Hantek ponies up a lot of cash for Apple's "designed for iPod' or whatever that program is called. Regarding Android drivers, is the protocol and hardware interface documented? Do they follow some (awful) industry standard like USBTMC? Or should the Hantek Windows SDK somehow be able to run on Android? This is exactly the reason why I prefer a completely documented protocol, not just a Windows SDK that will probably stop working once the major version of Windows comes along. Did I miss something and did Hantek provide protocol documentation?
Obsolescence is an issue with virtual instruments. A twenty years old piece of stand-alone equipment is still perfectly usable. A twenty years old virtual instrument, like a ISA DAQ interface, is useless. Some NI ISA cards only have drivers up to Windows '98. Their GPIB-ENET adapter only up to Windows XP. A life span of a few years may be acceptable for a $100 function generator, but kind of sucks if it's an oscilloscope costing a few thousands of dollars. Stand alone is a much safer bet, LCDs, knobs and buttons are more likely to keep working. NI have been predicting the death of the bench instruments for years. There still are bench scopes, multimeters power supplies and function generators on most benches, even those at NI. I consider virtual instruments more specialized instruments when automation is the prime objective and when space is at a premium. Virtual instruments tend to take up less rack space.