Author Topic: 008004 - smaller than 01005  (Read 43309 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline marshallhTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1469
  • Country: us
    • retroactive
008004 - smaller than 01005
« on: April 04, 2013, 04:28:27 am »
"When it becomes difficult to see whether or not you have a component at the pick position"....




They had to redesign tape feeders and the tape peelback to accomodate these. Pretty insane. I soldered some 0201 bypass caps digikey mistakenly shipping me once but haven't tried 01005.
Verilog tips
BGA soldering intro

11:37 <@ktemkin> c4757p: marshall has transcended communications media
11:37 <@ktemkin> He speaks protocols directly.
 

Offline c4757p

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7799
  • Country: us
  • adieu
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #1 on: April 04, 2013, 04:34:50 am »
Damn.
No longer active here - try the IRC channel if you just can't be without me :)
 

Offline KJDS

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2442
  • Country: gb
    • my website holding page
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #2 on: April 04, 2013, 06:58:42 am »
personally, eeeeeeek

professionally, yayyyy more microscope sales.

Offline Hypernova

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 655
  • Country: tw
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #3 on: April 04, 2013, 10:43:42 am »
I've soldered 01005 sans microscope with a tweezer before. Not really something I intend to do again.
 

Offline opablo

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 110
  • Country: ar
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #4 on: April 04, 2013, 01:51:45 pm »
About miniature components in general... (I have almost no experience with tiny smd...)

What about resistance on the leads/traces ? does a tiny cap have lower-than-expected performance because it has considerable resistance on it's leads/traces ?

Is there a table/sheet/rule where I can know about the resistances appearing on each size of smd ?
 

Offline c4757p

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7799
  • Country: us
  • adieu
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #5 on: April 04, 2013, 02:02:15 pm »
What about resistance on the leads/traces ? does a tiny cap have lower-than-expected performance because it has considerable resistance on it's leads/traces ?

01005 is 8mil wide, the same as many small PCB traces, so I doubt it's much worse than the trace running to it. Not sure the exact dimensions of 008004. Obviously you won't be using these for critical high speed decoupling caps, but they're not exactly molecular.
No longer active here - try the IRC channel if you just can't be without me :)
 

Offline metalphreak

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 815
  • Country: au
  • http://d.av.id.au
    • D.av.id.AU
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #6 on: April 04, 2013, 02:09:33 pm »
Step 1: Squeeze on some solder paste.
Step 2: Sprinkle on an assortment of 008004 resistors
Step 3: Bake @ 240degrees for 300 seconds.
Step 4: Trim excess ingredients.
Step 5: Enjoy delicious electronics.

vlf3

  • Guest
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #7 on: April 04, 2013, 02:10:24 pm »
Definitely insane size for the experimenter...  :scared:

Even with high magnification microscope and holding tools for placement, it's Star-Trek auto assembly stuff;
personally, I am to old to play with this size or any SMD... eyes and hand shake don't help; I'm sticking to
through-hole, for my old age to grave.  :=\
 

Offline c4757p

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7799
  • Country: us
  • adieu
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #8 on: April 04, 2013, 02:12:55 pm »
Definitely insane size for the experimenter...  :scared:

Yeah, that's a given. I do 0603 all the time, but my rule is that if it's indistinguishable from the dust on my bench, it is dust on my bench.
No longer active here - try the IRC channel if you just can't be without me :)
 

Offline AlfBaz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2187
  • Country: au
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #9 on: April 04, 2013, 02:27:11 pm »
I remember when I did my first board with 0603's everything looked huge in the cad software, then I ordered the parts and thought I had made a mistake! lucky I didn't get carried away and go 0402

Edit: for the record, wiki recons 01005 is .4mmx.2mm  :o
 

Offline free_electron

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8791
  • Country: us
    • SiliconValleyGarage
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #10 on: April 04, 2013, 03:03:31 pm »
YES !
More parts per square millimeter, high desnity interconnect, blind and buried vias , laserdrilling , plugged holes... Now pcb layout becomes interesting...
Professional Electron Wrangler.
Any comments, or points of view expressed, are my own and not endorsed , induced or compensated by my employer(s).
 

Offline nanofrog

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5446
  • Country: us
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #11 on: April 04, 2013, 07:38:02 pm »
YES !
More parts per square millimeter, high desnity interconnect, blind and buried vias , laserdrilling , plugged holes... Now pcb layout becomes a nightmare...
Fixed that for you.  >:D
 

Offline Smokey

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3607
  • Country: us
  • Not An Expert
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #12 on: April 04, 2013, 08:01:12 pm »
01005 resistors are only 1/32W.  What is an 008004?  1/64W?  That's just nuts.  I wonder if they just vaporize when they pop.
 

Offline megahz

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 72
  • Country: us
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #13 on: April 04, 2013, 08:05:45 pm »
pshhhh I can solder that with my eyes closed
 

Offline marshallhTopic starter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1469
  • Country: us
    • retroactive
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #14 on: April 04, 2013, 08:06:55 pm »
In addition voltage derating for ceramic 008004's will probably be insane, even 0201s suffer a lot from that
Verilog tips
BGA soldering intro

11:37 <@ktemkin> c4757p: marshall has transcended communications media
11:37 <@ktemkin> He speaks protocols directly.
 

Offline ivan747

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2053
  • Country: us
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #15 on: April 05, 2013, 01:24:38 am »
I remember when I did my first board with 0603's everything looked huge in the cad software, then I ordered the parts and thought I had made a mistake! lucky I didn't get carried away and go 0402

Edit: for the record, wiki recons 01005 is .4mmx.2mm  :o

Been there, done that.

I bet the first one to use these extensively in high volume will be Apple. They make tiny logic boards and often have crazy designs constrains just to bring you certain feature like being 23% thinner and 10% lighter. Or a longer lasting battery, something like that. But let's not turn this into a flame war.
 

Offline c4757p

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7799
  • Country: us
  • adieu
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #16 on: April 05, 2013, 01:29:49 am »
Definitely in a cell phone first. Mine is about a year old and definitely has some SMD parts that would be best described as "powder".
No longer active here - try the IRC channel if you just can't be without me :)
 

Offline lemmegraphdat

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 273
  • Country: us
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #17 on: April 05, 2013, 01:48:31 am »
 The boards of today are shortly going to be the microchips of tomorrow.
Start right now.
 

Offline nukie

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 822
  • Country: au
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #18 on: April 05, 2013, 04:18:53 am »
One more reason not to memorise resistor color bands.
 

Offline c4757p

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7799
  • Country: us
  • adieu
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #19 on: April 05, 2013, 04:54:30 am »
Yes, because 008004 can be used on a breadboard.
No longer active here - try the IRC channel if you just can't be without me :)
 

Offline AlfBaz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2187
  • Country: au
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #20 on: April 05, 2013, 05:26:26 am »
These things are that small you'd be able to have the components mounted on midlayers, prepreg should be able to absorb the height fluctuations
 

Offline mianchen

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 225
  • Country: gb
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #21 on: April 05, 2013, 05:47:44 am »
what can the hobbyists do in 50years time when they want to learn some basic electronics?

Sent from Mars

 

Offline codeboy2k

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1836
  • Country: ca
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #22 on: April 05, 2013, 05:55:12 am »
what can the hobbyists do in 50years time when they want to learn some basic electronics?

Radio-Shack (and/or Dick Smith in Australia) will release "My Home Wafer Fab", with a shout out to pioneer Jeri Ellsworth :)


 

Offline Psi

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11523
  • Country: nz
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #23 on: April 05, 2013, 06:38:07 am »
what can the hobbyists do in 50years time

Imagine if we can print resistors/capacitors/transistors directly onto a substrate using something similar to an inkjet printer.

No more soldering needed except as interconnects between boards. Even that could be done over fiber optics using printed organic leds and sensors.

Greek letter 'Psi' (not Pounds per Square Inch)
 

Offline AlfBaz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2187
  • Country: au
Re: 008004 - smaller than 01005
« Reply #24 on: April 05, 2013, 10:05:00 am »
Where's Chris Gammell?
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf