Quit whining ya'll. You are just jealous you didn't come up with it
No. I'm stupefied by the uselessification of a wonderful tool.
Did they mod the scope to fit in a passively-cooled silent chassis, for anechoic chamber testing? No.
Did they mod the scope to reduce its EMI and EMI sensitivity, for EMI chamber testing? No.
Not even seeing if adding a grounded ITO layer in front of the display could remove the (little) EMI from the display (although that makes touch screens inoperable)? No.
Did they mod the scope to sit nicely in a standard 19" rack, which everybody uses to build transportable test setups and even scientific experiments? No.
Did they use the scope as a tool? No, they just wanted eye candy.I just left academia, because while I am a pretty darn good simulator and research software tool developer, at least here nobody is interested in that: it is much easier to just buy more hardware (typically top-tier Nvidia gear for GPU computation), and use the same inefficient software we've had for the last two or three decades. Talk about using a hammer to drive screws in... Like Keysight here, nobody is interested in actually modifying the tools so that they'd be better suited for the task, since it is easier to get funding for more new hardware instead. Everything is measured using oddball metrics (like "views on Youtube", or the number of published papers per employee ignoring whether those papers are correct or need to be retracted later – those are Somebody Elses Problems). Like with the blinged-out scope, it's easy to get attention by doing whatever everyone else is also already doing; at least then you're swimming with the flow, not against it.
And it's stupid: waste of an expensive tool, and a tool that many hobbyists like myself cannot afford.
(My current "scope" is an Analog Discovery 2 board. I only do low voltage stuff, but I do need differential input in the 0..5 VDC range, for example for measuring gadgets' 5VDC current draw over a shunt resistor; typically the exact value isn't that interesting, as I'm more looking at the spikiness and fluctuation instead. Glitches in the current flow in the 10 Hz - 1 MHz frequency range, really. A proper scope and a differential probe is > 1k€. And if I save up to that, I better save up for a better model, so I can do rough EMI testing – at least comparative testing, to see if the device I'm working on produces less EMI than a known acceptable device. And then I might be ready to get a reflow oven, and consider moving to 4/6-layer boards and BGA components. So yeah, I
am jealous of those who get free expensive tools, because I know how useful good tools are. Seeing them converted to a Raspberry Pi Light Show is, frankly, pretty damn offensive.)