General > General Technical Chat
Android platform, what a mess
eti:
You're not gonna like this... that is, you're not, if you're the kind of person who feels it's a "competition" which needs to be "won", or it's like a football team to bicker over and fall down rabbit holes of debate over, wasting years of your life. If you have the ability to detach yourself from emotions for a moment, and ponder objectively, you'll be fine. Okay.
No it's not that at all, it's just that Android always was, always has been and still is, an absolutely terrible technical and business compromise from Google, the reigning King supreme of ADHD-esque, ethically devoid, incompetent and bungling buffoons.
Who thought making a platform based on Java, merely because Java is easily understood by potential developers, as a prudent decision?
Who thought that "But it's open source guys!" was a good reason to add weight to the already weak reasoning for choosing Java/JVM based OS? It's NOT open source, only the kernel is. (the technically ignorant still magnify the "open source" tagline, whilst conveniently remaining silent about the rest.)?
Who thought that not enforcing strict guidelines such as who could build and vend the OS on their devices (which mean that failures of the platform are significantly lessened, ergo Google-centric blame would be lessened also, I think)?
Who thought that any of this was wise, or that allowing others to borrow the code, re-skin it, and spin it off in a trillion different OS', hoping that the gullible would believe that "SmoothSilkOS" or other silly ROM names, compiled in the bedroom of some Indian teenager, were a good idea? Lol++++
Who thought at all? Not many it seems .
There's an answer... but it's not Android, for if it HAD been a decent platform, then why would Google be quietly considering its replacement with "project fuchsia"? They wouldn't. Do you see Apple replacing iOS? Hah!
MK14:
Red Alert Issued, as Android Phone Rant Storm ETI Hits EEVBLOG Forums, UK.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-60421388
eti:
--- Quote from: MK14 on February 18, 2022, 05:42:42 am ---Red Alert Issued, as Android Phone Rant Storm ETI Hits EEVBLOG Forums, UK.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-60421388
--- End quote ---
Stone cold blue obvious response message broadcast, for this was not a rant, this an empassioned observation on a truly laughable platform.
It's a mess, and those who deny it, deny logic itself. Calling something a "rant" is called inciting a riot, and since I am not intent to rant, and didn't intend to, sorry, you'll be disappointed, and will have to revert to YouTube or TV for your cheap thrills :)
MK14:
This is for when the OP's initial post, gets edited into a:
..
--- Quote from: eti on February 18, 2022, 05:27:39 am ---You're not gonna like this... that is, you're not, if you're the kind of person who feels it's a "competition" which needs to be "won", or it's like a football team to bicker over and fall down rabbit holes of debate over, wasting years of your life. If you have the ability to detach yourself from emotions for a moment, and ponder objectively, you'll be fine. Okay.
No it's not that at all, it's just that Android always was, always has been and still is, an absolutely terrible technical and business compromise from Google, the reigning King supreme of ADHD-esque, ethically devoid, incompetent and bungling buffoons.
Who thought making a platform based on Java, merely because Java is easily understood by potential developers, as a prudent decision?
Who thought that "But it's open source guys!" was a good reason to add weight to the already weak reasoning for choosing Java/JVM based OS? It's NOT open source, only the kernel is. (the technically ignorant still magnify the "open source" tagline, whilst conveniently remaining silent about the rest.)?
Who thought that not enforcing strict guidelines such as who could build and vend the OS on their devices (which mean that failures of the platform are significantly lessened, ergo Google-centric blame would be lessened also, I think)?
Who thought that any of this was wise, or that allowing others to borrow the code, re-skin it, and spin it off in a trillion different OS', hoping that the gullible would believe that "SmoothSilkOS" or other silly ROM names, compiled in the bedroom of some Indian teenager, were a good idea? Lol++++
Who thought at all? Not many it seems .
There's an answer... but it's not Android, for if it HAD been a decent platform, then why would Google be quietly considering its replacement with "project fuchsia"? They wouldn't. Do you see Apple replacing iOS? Hah!
--- End quote ---
eti:
--- Quote from: MK14 on February 18, 2022, 05:45:19 am ---This is for when the OP's initial post, gets edited into a:
..
--- Quote from: eti on February 18, 2022, 05:27:39 am ---You're not gonna like this... that is, you're not, if you're the kind of person who feels it's a "competition" which needs to be "won", or it's like a football team to bicker over and fall down rabbit holes of debate over, wasting years of your life. If you have the ability to detach yourself from emotions for a moment, and ponder objectively, you'll be fine. Okay.
No it's not that at all, it's just that Android always was, always has been and still is, an absolutely terrible technical and business compromise from Google, the reigning King supreme of ADHD-esque, ethically devoid, incompetent and bungling buffoons.
Who thought making a platform based on Java, merely because Java is easily understood by potential developers, as a prudent decision?
Who thought that "But it's open source guys!" was a good reason to add weight to the already weak reasoning for choosing Java/JVM based OS? It's NOT open source, only the kernel is. (the technically ignorant still magnify the "open source" tagline, whilst conveniently remaining silent about the rest.)?
Who thought that not enforcing strict guidelines such as who could build and vend the OS on their devices (which mean that failures of the platform are significantly lessened, ergo Google-centric blame would be lessened also, I think)?
Who thought that any of this was wise, or that allowing others to borrow the code, re-skin it, and spin it off in a trillion different OS', hoping that the gullible would believe that "SmoothSilkOS" or other silly ROM names, compiled in the bedroom of some Indian teenager, were a good idea? Lol++++
Who thought at all? Not many it seems .
There's an answer... but it's not Android, for if it HAD been a decent platform, then why would Google be quietly considering its replacement with "project fuchsia"? They wouldn't. Do you see Apple replacing iOS? Hah!
--- End quote ---
--- End quote ---
I think it isn't. Have a nice weekend ;D
PS: I see no humourous correlation between a genuine BBC news article, and your trying to force it into a "joke" about my post. That's just contrived. I don't mean that in a snotty way, it just doesn't work - sorry!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version