General > General Technical Chat
Another deadly 737 Max control bug just found!
<< < (27/37) > >>
SilverSolder:

When it rains, it pours...   really pours...
SiliconWizard:

--- Quote from: BravoV on March 09, 2020, 02:55:23 am ---You called that a management ?  :palm:

--- End quote ---

That's what they seem to be positioned at. Not my fault. :-DD


--- Quote from: BravoV on March 09, 2020, 02:55:23 am ---They look more like a bunch of stock trader's employees, that their employer is taking a short position at the Boeing's stock.   >:D

--- End quote ---

Now that you mention that, it's starting to look so bad that you may wonder if some people are not trying to prepare some nasty insider trading or something.
BravoV:

--- Quote from: SiliconWizard on March 09, 2020, 01:57:29 pm ---
--- Quote from: BravoV on March 09, 2020, 02:55:23 am ---You called that a management ?  :palm:

--- End quote ---

That's what they seem to be positioned at. Not my fault. :-DD


--- Quote from: BravoV on March 09, 2020, 02:55:23 am ---They look more like a bunch of stock trader's employees, that their employer is taking a short position at the Boeing's stock.   >:D

--- End quote ---

Now that you mention that, it's starting to look so bad that you may wonder if some people are not trying to prepare some nasty insider trading or something.

--- End quote ---

The proof of the pudding is in the eating, 12% share value drop in a single day is a really-really serious number.  >:D

-> Boeing shares plunge on coronavirus, 737 MAX wiring bundle setback
schmitt trigger:
Boeing is a major, MAJOR defense and aerospace contractor for the US government.

It is too big and too important to allow it to fail. It will be bailed out.
coppercone2:
boeing has two divisions, military and civilian, they are isolated. or should be.

the problem is however split, since the air force found booties in tanker aircraft, which should go through the boeing military channels, and also the FAA found stuff in civilian planes. 

This traces the bug to some thing shared. the two divisions should not reuse each others policies and develop independent policies so this kind of thing can be root cause analyzed to a management decision problem. to me this seems like a sign of poor isolation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_Defense,_Space_%26_Security

the two divisions are clearly sharing something bad and there is a leakage between them some where. you would think military standards would be tighter and the issue would be isolated to civilian aircraft. So, it seems like metastasis.  are they both fucking the same (sub) contractor and sharing fake cribnotes about vendor reliability rather then checking ? (division transfer, 'off the books' information on how to save money because 'those guys are good'?) evil consultants being used to control both divisions by one party?

or was the shoe issue related to civilian aircraft that was just used by military (I assume they have private jumbo jets for troop transports to non front line bases possibly, to reduce cost since military planes are not necessary for sending technicians to friendly nations?)
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod