Author Topic: Apple engineer talks through the design of the new Macbook  (Read 14735 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mrflibble

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2051
  • Country: nl
Re: Apple engineer talks through the design of the new Macbook
« Reply #25 on: March 20, 2015, 11:57:41 am »

but i found a similar "time machine app" and have been using it for many years. it is linux based REDO. it boots itself from a bootable CD/DVD drive stand alone, and you rip up the contents into a folder of sorts which can be copied and stored elsewhere. http://sourceforge.net/projects/redobackup/?source=typ_redirect

the other option of virtually endless automatic self backup is "SNAPRAID", however this works more in situations of very large arrays. it is a hybrid of RAID + scheduled server backups. i would imagine this option to apply to your personal "micro backblaze"
If you like those two and are on linux, you might want to take a look at rsnapshot. Depending on your distro you don't even have to read that website but just do apt-get install rsnapshot, configure and off you go. Been using it for a few years now and so far it's done it's job nicely.
 

Offline BradC

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2106
  • Country: au
Re: Apple engineer talks through the design of the new Macbook
« Reply #26 on: March 20, 2015, 02:05:55 pm »
So no, it doesn't "just work".

For you. For some people does just fine. Life is about choices.

 

Offline HowardlongTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5319
  • Country: gb
Re: Apple engineer talks through the design of the new Macbook
« Reply #27 on: March 20, 2015, 11:54:59 pm »
So no, it doesn't "just work".

For you. For some people does just fine. Life is about choices.

Absolutely right, if you're happy for an outfit to control both your hardware and software choices then you have to accept that on occasion, either deliberately or through their negligence, you will have to compromise and they will cripple their hardware offering and push you to unnecessarily buy some more.

Don't get me wrong, I actually rate their hardware very highly, I just object to the level of control they wield over it for OSX with their, and in some cases third party software. The same goes for IOS in an even more extreme way. Of you have ever tried to develop anything for IOS you will understand where I am coming from.

If you are happy with that ecosystem, then great, but I find it all a bit unnecessary and disappointing that they can be so ambivalent and dictatorial about it. Considering the bad rap Microsoft get over controlling just the software side of things, I find it somewhat absurd that Apple seem to get a relatively untainted sheet: Apple, after all, get to control not only the software but also the hardware, and are even prepared to unnecessarily cripple their own hardware with their software to encourage you to buy more.
 

Offline Richard Crowley

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4317
  • Country: us
  • KJ7YLK
Re: Apple engineer talks through the design of the new Macbook
« Reply #28 on: March 21, 2015, 02:22:45 am »
Here is a DIFFERENT story with the same video:  https://youtu.be/NHbUROGAGYQ
"Sound Mixer's Story" about a production sound guy who gets the typical offer of a "job" at near-zero wages.
 

Offline Muxr

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1369
  • Country: us
Re: Apple engineer talks through the design of the new Macbook
« Reply #29 on: March 21, 2015, 02:42:48 am »
Considering the bad rap Microsoft get over controlling just the software side of things, I find it somewhat absurd that Apple seem to get a relatively untainted sheet: Apple, after all, get to control not only the software but also the hardware, and are even prepared to unnecessarily cripple their own hardware with their software to encourage you to buy more.

The reason Microsoft got a bad rap in the 90s (they seem to be getting better about this), is the vendor lock in, which they were able to pull off due to their desktop monopoly. I mean they are convicted monopoly abusers on multiple continents.

Apple doesn't have a monopoly in any of the markets (perhaps tablets) so they can't really do it even if they tried. But they also tend to be better about using open standards. For as much as everyone moaned about Apple not allowing Flash in their iOS devices, it was actually a good thing as it gave HTML5 a boost it needed to garner wider adoption.

I will give you a recent example of things Microsoft does that absolutely drive me nuts. Company I work for uses MS Exchange for their email. It's a large corporation and getting to your mail is a major PITA. 2fa and all that. They do however offer ActiveSync without 2fa. But because ActiveSync is a proprietary protocol there is nothing you can do to actually check your email using the ActiveSync on a computer. Those who have tried have been slapped with DMCA notices.

Microsoft has released ActiveSync clients only on mobile devices. And the one company which offered a solution was actually purchased by them and shut down. Now I am not a Microsoft user. I don't run any of the Microsoft software, but I am affected by their vendor lock in. Because they like to push proprietary protocols in markets they have a monopoly.

I have never heard of a reverse case. If you're not an Apple user you can completely avoid Apple in your life. But with Microsoft it is impossible to avoid. That's just a recent example. But there a plenty of other examples of Microsoft's vendor lock in.

- File sharing with thumb drives and the 4Gb file limit. (proprietary FAT32) Because Windows doesn't out of the box support a common open standard file system everyone is stuck using an antiquated file system in order to have cross platform compatibility.

- IE6: Not an issue anymore really, but if you've done web dev in your past you will know how quality of life impacting this was.

- DirectX. Gaming industry is trying to release open platforms, things like Valve's Steam Machine. But one of the main reasons gaming is predominantly a Windows thing is because DirectX is a closed standard that only runs on Windows.

So while Apple has it's problems with OS X hardware lock ins and such. At least they aren't propagating them to non customers. The thing is with Microsoft, even if you aren't in their ecosystem you are still affected by their crap which is way worse imo.
« Last Edit: March 21, 2015, 02:54:54 am by Muxr »
 

Offline HowardlongTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5319
  • Country: gb
Re: Apple engineer talks through the design of the new Macbook
« Reply #30 on: March 21, 2015, 12:04:47 pm »
- IE6: Not an issue anymore really, but if you've done web dev in your past you will know how quality of life impacting this was.

I have tried to avoid doing browser based development since I first did some back around 1996/7 on NT 4.0 Server with an OS/2 database backend, and IE3.

Luckily I have managed to stay out of Web UI development most of my career, but the last time was a JEE JSF and Ajax based system back in 2010 that I accidentally got involved with that had some really nasty organically developed CSS behind it.

I fully agree, IE has and had its own problems, but it is also the open standards themselves which are too open to interpretation. Having to hack stuff to make it work across several browsers and versions of browsers must be one of the most soul destroying jobs I ever did.

Never say never, but web devs can keep their jobs as far as I am concerned!

When Microsoft decided to make IE4 integrated into the OS'S desktop (Active Desktop), that was when the rot really started setting in, and that was about 1997 or so. I remember uninstalling IE4 it because it was just so resource intensive.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf