Yes, it is dying as an ART. I create schematics, PCB layouts and coding for a living. I consider these to be treated as ARTWORK, not just output files.
I often have to read others' schematics, layouts and code; including those from reputable companies. Pet gripes:
1. Inheriting schematics done by lazy engineers.
2. Inheriting PCB layouts done by lazy engineers.
3. Inheriting firmware written by lazy engineers or programmers.
I say lazy, because often that is the reason things are incomplete, ambiguous and even unreadable. But sometime management does not provide the time to do things properly. I see it a lot. Lack of test points, lack of net labels, dodgy track layout, or no ground test points - the latter should be be punishable by death. Poorly named or inconsistently named schematic sheets is very common. The ad-hoc use of underscores and upper/lower case is a pet gripe. Using underscores in net labels is plain bloody stupid when using Altium.
This can be all prevented ensuring there are company standards (schematic, layout and C/C#/C++ coding standards). It's hard work to create them, but it is a good investment.