Well I got sent an HP 1741A instead of the 1742A which I'm super upset about because it doesn't have a multimeter on the top like in the ad.
I researched and I found that the scopes above both come with this probe as included items:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/HP-AGILENT-10041A-100MHz-10X-Mini-Scope-Probe-/350273714311?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item518df0b887#ht_818wt_857
I looked at after-market probes, and they do not match the specification of the probe above. The closes I could find that matched was the 'typical' 100mhz ebay probe below. A comparison is below. Any help would be greatly appreciated at this point.
HP 10041a probe:
Bandwidth of 100MHz
Division ration is 10:1
Input Resistance of 1Mohm
Shunt capacitance of 12pF
Compensates oscilloscopes input of 20 to 26pF
Max. DC Volts of 300
Ebay replacement probe:
Two Oscilloscope Scope Clip Probe 100MHz
Bandwidth
DC-6MHz
DC-100MHz
Attenuation Ration
1:10
Input Resistance
1M?:10M?
Input Capacitance
1X:85pF-115pF
10X:14.5pF-17.5pF
Compensation Range
15pF-35pF
Rise Time
<3.5ns
Working Voltage
10X:<200vDC+ACPeak --> ?? What does that mean?
Why don't you try for a part refund,as you have been put to the extra inconvenience & cost of now needing to buy a standalone DMM to do what the built in one would have done?
That said,the 1741 is still a very capable instrument.
With the probes,both advertisers are pretty much mangling the specifications.
They keep referring to 1Mohm in both ads.
That,in fact is the input impedance of the 'scope itself,or with a 1X probe,
a 10X probe lifts the impedance,(as far as the circuit you are probing is concerned) to 10 Mohm.
The second probe is switchable from 1X to 10X.
A drawback to these,is that the switch gives trouble after a while in many cases.
The voltage rating on that one is a bit strange.
I think they may be trying to refer to a DC voltage with a fairly high value of AC signal superimposed on it,as often is the case in the higher power stages of tube audio amplifiers,or CRT type TV deflection circuits.
Both probes seem to have similar compensation ranges,so they would probably both be OK.
The HP one would be my preference,but is probably more costly.
Occasionally,you will see these genuine HP,Tektronix,Philips,etc probes available,but they are of course,either used,or old stock in many cases.