Anti-theft device. the coils and the two caps are resonant circuits for the theft detector at the doors. The IC and resistors are pure camouflage (very usual back then).
Camouflage for what? The device is concealed inside the speaker, what would be the point of adding gratuitous components?
They are all connected properly as the OP said. It is a frequency divider using a flip-flop. The resistors are probably for bias or something. What's odd is there does not seem to be a way to disable the device externally if it is a theft alarm trigger.
It is a puzzle and one with no schematic and with low resolution photography
A dummy 4013 is not credible to me.
I was reading about the history of EAS
https://losspreventionmedia.com/electronic-article-surveillance-eas-source-tagging/ and don't see anything like this mentioned.
I have seen a circuit where a 4013 was used as an amplifier:
So, assume, for the sake of argument, that it is some kind of beacon / transponder that is detectable by something like a simple AM/FM radio. How long would that 3V last once activated? A week?
I suppose it could have some use to tell whether some returned item was "ours" (without opening it up) and had not been voided?
It would be an interesting experiment to draw out a schematic and put a fresh battery in it and see what you could detect. In any event, the difficulty in finding any record of such a device (at least so far) is, in a sense, testimony to its limited efficacy.