Author Topic: Cheap 'human' non-contact thermometers  (Read 2260 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online najraoTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 220
Cheap 'human' non-contact thermometers
« on: December 20, 2021, 10:31:32 am »
Thousands, if not millions, of these handhelds are being discarded after they no longer work. I read in a manual that they only last for 'up to' 40 000 clicks, and indeed may be so. I checked a few: the displays still work, but report 'Hi' or 'Lo'. So it is the sensor. What sensor, and why does it have to have such limited life? Google failed me to find the answer. Seems criminal to create such waste. May be it is lucrative to the sellers to force new sales! Can we recover them to use again? How?
 

Offline Berni

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5050
  • Country: si
Re: Cheap 'human' non-contact thermometers
« Reply #1 on: December 20, 2021, 10:49:52 am »
They are likely using a infrared thermopile sensor much like the general purpose IR thermometers. The sensor can be a bit delicate but it should not have a limited number of uses like that. Maybe the sensors get damaged from rough handling or blocked by dirt getting into the "optics"

It is possible they have a built in kill timer that makes it dead after too many uses, very shady practice, but you can probably find out if you try reverse engineering one of these.
 

Online Gyro

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 10173
  • Country: gb
Re: Cheap 'human' non-contact thermometers
« Reply #2 on: December 20, 2021, 01:18:19 pm »
Thousands, if not millions, of these handhelds are being discarded after they no longer work. I read in a manual that they only last for 'up to' 40 000 clicks, and indeed may be so. I checked a few: the displays still work, but report 'Hi' or 'Lo'. So it is the sensor. What sensor, and why does it have to have such limited life? Google failed me to find the answer. Seems criminal to create such waste. May be it is lucrative to the sellers to force new sales! Can we recover them to use again? How?

Not a problem I've come across.

Are you sure that isn't (only) 40000 clicks battery life?  Did you try changing the battery (probably a CR3032).

Even at 40000 clicks, with a fairly pessimistic 10 measurements a day (typical family twice a day?), that's still 11 years, which would be typical shelf life of the battery. I think I'd want to check its calibration well before then anyway.


Edit: Yes, a good clean might well help.

« Last Edit: December 20, 2021, 01:20:02 pm by Gyro »
Best Regards, Chris
 

Online najraoTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 220
Re: Cheap 'human' non-contact thermometers
« Reply #3 on: December 20, 2021, 01:55:27 pm »
Gyro, not so I'm afraid. These are used in hospitals, or even in metro stations, and may be clicked hundreds or thousands of times a day.
The example here uses 2×AAA, and fresh batteries don't change the defunct status. Yes, I am sure the manual means "total service life" and not battery replacement time. Another said 'two years' as the instruments usable life.
What I am after is identifying what fails, and if the infrared source/sensor, what is it, and could it be cannibalized from another thermometer? Or sourced as a replacement part. There is no type number on the little pcb which carries the sensor. It has 4 connections. That is all we have.
 

Online MK14

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4987
  • Country: gb
Re: Cheap 'human' non-contact thermometers
« Reply #4 on: December 20, 2021, 01:55:57 pm »
I read in a manual that they only last for 'up to' 40 000 clicks, and indeed may be so.

You don't seem to have supplied a link or picture or quote from the actual manual.

Here is one:
https://d3m9l0v76dty0.cloudfront.net/system/photos/2705008/original/091a2827f12a4c29e09d06e0244fe9ea.pdf?1521030777

It appears to say:

Quote
its longevity is guaranteed for 40,000 takings

Which seems to mean, that it is suppose to work for at least >40,000 readings.

I can't see why that would bother you. Since most things also have life expectancies and/or limited number of uses, before it wears out and/or runs out of guarantee.

As with most things, they could be built to last longer. But it would usually considerably increase the cost.

Example:
You make yourself a screwdriver. You can make it quickly, using cheap materials, and it might last for 100 uses.
Alternatively, you could spend weeks making it and the best and most expensive materials to make it. It then could be used by your great great great grandchildren, if you have any.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2021, 02:00:32 pm by MK14 »
 

Online najraoTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 220
Re: Cheap 'human' non-contact thermometers
« Reply #5 on: December 20, 2021, 03:01:47 pm »
MK14, the manual you have linked to does not apply to the Bo Hui T-168, which is what I have here. I do have a manual for this, but am now unable to link it here. I attach a screenshot of the page which gives the service life as 40 000 clicks.
I request that you desist from making sundry comments deviating from my legitimate request for possible technical help. Especially if you are unable to provide any.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2021, 03:08:09 pm by najrao »
 

Offline tom66

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7334
  • Country: gb
  • Electronics Hobbyist & FPGA/Embedded Systems EE
Re: Cheap 'human' non-contact thermometers
« Reply #6 on: December 20, 2021, 11:13:17 pm »
These sensors don't really work anyway.  Non contact IR sensing for fever screening is done by looking at a very specific point on the face, just scanning foreheads or the back of hands tells you pretty much nothing about someone who doesn't think they're feverous, but is going into one (and that's probably the point where you're most infectious, especially because you're taking almost no precautions.)  Besides, the forehead skin temperature variance between someone who is feverous and someone who has exercised is actually pretty close too.

These problems means the screening process more or less requires a TI camera or very well focused thermal optics, neither of which these offer.

Disclaimer - I work for a company that makes equipment like this, but this requirement is from FDA.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2021, 11:15:07 pm by tom66 »
 
The following users thanked this post: Bassman59, najrao, MK14, SiliconWizard, duckduck

Offline TimFox

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9000
  • Country: us
  • Retired, now restoring antique test equipment
Re: Cheap 'human' non-contact thermometers
« Reply #7 on: December 20, 2021, 11:21:59 pm »
The manual pages posted above are not written in careful English, but I would read the "lifetime" as a minimum guarantee, not a defined or maximum lifetime.
 
The following users thanked this post: najrao, tooki, MK14

Online Zero999

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 20357
  • Country: gb
  • 0999
Re: Cheap 'human' non-contact thermometers
« Reply #8 on: December 21, 2021, 11:33:33 am »
These sensors don't really work anyway.  Non contact IR sensing for fever screening is done by looking at a very specific point on the face, just scanning foreheads or the back of hands tells you pretty much nothing about someone who doesn't think they're feverous, but is going into one (and that's probably the point where you're most infectious, especially because you're taking almost no precautions.)  Besides, the forehead skin temperature variance between someone who is feverous and someone who has exercised is actually pretty close too.

These problems means the screening process more or less requires a TI camera or very well focused thermal optics, neither of which these offer.

Disclaimer - I work for a company that makes equipment like this, but this requirement is from FDA.
I suspect the real reason why lots of these contactless thermometers have been discarded is because a huge number were purchased with the aim of controlling the spread of SARS-Cov2, but unlike the previous virus, whether someone has a fever or not, is a poor indication of infection.
 

Online najraoTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 220
Re: Cheap 'human' non-contact thermometers
« Reply #9 on: December 21, 2021, 12:25:09 pm »
The discarded ones are almost always defunct and FUBARRED. So, not a case of excess stock thrown out.
 

Offline tooki

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 13157
  • Country: ch
Re: Cheap 'human' non-contact thermometers
« Reply #10 on: December 21, 2021, 12:30:01 pm »
MK14, the manual you have linked to does not apply to the Bo Hui T-168, which is what I have here. I do have a manual for this, but am now unable to link it here. I attach a screenshot of the page which gives the service life as 40 000 clicks.
I request that you desist from making sundry comments deviating from my legitimate request for possible technical help. Especially if you are unable to provide any.
Your original request assumes that the failure of your unit a) has to do with the 40K rated lifespan, and that b) it must be the sensor that failed.

You have no proof for either of those assumptions, and it’s just as likely that they’re not the case.

If you have a concrete failure you want to repair, give more info on it so we can troubleshoot. But your original post suggests more of a general question, which makes the “sundry” comments absolutely relevant.
 
The following users thanked this post: Someone, Gyro, MK14

Offline Someone

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5155
  • Country: au
    • send complaints here
Re: Cheap 'human' non-contact thermometers
« Reply #11 on: December 21, 2021, 10:01:27 pm »
The manual pages posted above are not written in careful English, but I would read the "lifetime" as a minimum guarantee, not a defined or maximum lifetime.
Worse:

low cost products cloned n times over, their product specifications have been through the same "telephone game" of imperfect copying

and/or

low cost item loudly proclaims performance specifications copied from contract/competitor/tender documents to "compete", item has never been tested or verified to meet said specifications. paper is cheap
 
The following users thanked this post: tooki, MK14

Offline floobydust

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7678
  • Country: ca
Re: Cheap 'human' non-contact thermometers
« Reply #12 on: December 22, 2021, 07:44:33 pm »
I have .webm explaining the issue but could not upload- the IR sensor is not wired up and firmware gives nice 36.1C readings that move around a little.
Basically, they are fake IR medical thermometers.
 
The following users thanked this post: MK14

Online MK14

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4987
  • Country: gb
Re: Cheap 'human' non-contact thermometers
« Reply #13 on: December 23, 2021, 12:50:20 pm »
I have .webm explaining the issue but could not upload- the IR sensor is not wired up and firmware gives nice 36.1C readings that move around a little.
Basically, they are fake IR medical thermometers.

This has a video about it. It looks remarkably like the one the OP pictured.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11365234/scammers-trade-fake-coronavirus-protection-gear-medicine/
 

Offline floobydust

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7678
  • Country: ca
Re: Cheap 'human' non-contact thermometers
« Reply #14 on: December 23, 2021, 08:29:16 pm »
Yes that's the vid, thanks for the link.
I can't see any money savings there, aside from the 3-wire cable to the IR sensor and labour to solder it in. Unless it's to destroy the West by giving out fake negative fever results.
Somebody came up with fake firmware for a reason.
 
The following users thanked this post: MK14

Online MK14

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4987
  • Country: gb
Re: Cheap 'human' non-contact thermometers
« Reply #15 on: December 23, 2021, 08:41:58 pm »
Yes that's the vid, thanks for the link.
I can't see any money savings there, aside from the 3-wire cable to the IR sensor and labour to solder it in. Unless it's to destroy the West by giving out fake negative fever results.
Somebody came up with fake firmware for a reason.

It's crazy, and totally reckless, as it risks lives. Ignoring earlier arguments (e.g. on medical grounds), as to if these head scanning thermometers (IR), are useful/safe (when NOT fakes).

It would seem to be a very dubious way of making money, by selling/producing/designing fake thermometers (IR). Because it could literally end up killing people.
Some of the really cheap Chinese stuff, is known to have potential safety hazards, such as electric shock, fire and maybe other hazards. BigCliveDotCom youtube channel, often details such things.

The front blue keyboard layout/section and its colour. Seem amazingly identical, between that video and the OPs supplied picture. Even the label on the side seems rather similar or identical.

It would be nice to see big/clear decent photographs of the inside (especially), of the OPs unit(s). So, we could judge for ourselves.

It is a bit like the jellybean cheap/plentiful, op-amp parts, which the Chinese still fake, just to save a cent or so, on the genuine parts. It just seems so silly, really.
 

Offline cdev

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • !
  • Posts: 7350
  • Country: 00
Re: Cheap 'human' non-contact thermometers
« Reply #16 on: December 23, 2021, 10:16:19 pm »
Maybe accurate instruments cost more because they work better.
Coronavirus is supposed to be "the money making opportunity of a lifetime". And its safe to say it also drove up prices of many goods.

. Items are supposed to determine their own prices in a self-regulation process, At least that is my understanding of the economics of prices as elucidated by Friedrich Hayek. and debunked by Karl Polanyi.
« Last Edit: December 23, 2021, 11:29:11 pm by cdev »
"What the large print giveth, the small print taketh away."
 

Offline ejeffrey

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4033
  • Country: us
Re: Cheap 'human' non-contact thermometers
« Reply #17 on: December 24, 2021, 10:32:35 pm »
Where are you getting these?  Do you know their history?  How many are there?  It sounds like you are dumpster diving and testing discarded devices?

There is no real wear mechanism except the switch.  If the switch is fine and the sensor isn't working my guess is that it was dropped and something inside broke or got misaligned so it was thrown away.  Nothing to do with a 40,000 click lifetime, but these are built cheap and flimsy.
 
The following users thanked this post: RichardS

Online Zero999

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 20357
  • Country: gb
  • 0999
Re: Cheap 'human' non-contact thermometers
« Reply #18 on: December 25, 2021, 08:33:13 pm »
Maybe accurate instruments cost more because they work better.
Coronavirus is supposed to be "the money making opportunity of a lifetime". And its safe to say it also drove up prices of many goods.

. Items are supposed to determine their own prices in a self-regulation process, At least that is my understanding of the economics of prices as elucidated by Friedrich Hayek. and debunked by Karl Polanyi.
Because they're useless in preventing the spread of SARS-Cov2?
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf